- 10 connection limit?
- Posted by Fabio Martins on December 6th, 2007
Is there any link to microsoft support site that explains the WinXP SP2 10
connection limit?
--
Fabio Martins
OS/CN Analyst
http://fabiomartins.net
- Posted by Shenan Stanley on December 6th, 2007
Fabio Martins wrote:
Search using Google!
http://www.google.com/
(How-to: http://www.google.com/intl/en/help/basics.html )
Inbound connections limit in Windows XP
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/314882
Troubleshooting Server Message Block inbound connection limit in Windows
peer-to-peer workgroup
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/328459
--
Shenan Stanley
MS-MVP
--
How To Ask Questions The Smart Way
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
- Posted by TonySper on December 6th, 2007
There is a 10 limit connection on all but the XP PRO. I switched to the XP
Pro and have 20 users on it with no problem.
Tony
"Fabio Martins" <support.novell@fabiomartins.net> wrote in message
news:uYjHPlEOIHA.1188@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
- Posted by Shenan Stanley on December 6th, 2007
TonySper wrote:
Incorrect.
You may have 20 computers that may access it randomly - but you get 10
connections at a given time.
--
Shenan Stanley
MS-MVP
--
How To Ask Questions The Smart Way
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
- Posted by nass on December 6th, 2007
"Fabio Martins" wrote:
Hi Fabio,
The limitation of how many computers can connect at the same time is:
10 connections for XP pro
5 Connections for Windows XP Home
It will be best if you explain what you mean by the limitation and what your
objectives are or you want to achieve. Also what Network environment,
Hardware and Software involved in the settings!.
Inbound connections limit in Windows XP
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/314882
Also best if you send to these NG:
Networking and the Web:
http://www.microsoft.com/communities...&lang=en&cr=US
Wireless Networking:
http://www.microsoft.com/communities...&lang=en&cr=US
For better answers to your Specific Question.
HTH.
nass
----
http://www.nasstec.co.uk
- Posted by VanguardLH on December 6th, 2007
"Fabio Martins" wrote in message
news:uYjHPlEOIHA.1188@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
Geez, how lazy. Do your own search. It's at:
http://support.microsoft.com
You obviously already knew about the support site so why didn't you
use it? A search there on "10 connection limit windows xp" showed a
related article as the first match.
- Posted by TonySper on December 6th, 2007
Well Thank You for clearing me up. I guess I just have not noticed any
delays in any of the workstations like I did when I had the other XP in the
server. Before I installed the XP pro there was times when I could not even
connect from some workstations. Will read up more before my tongue gets in
high gear while my brain is still in low.
Tony
"Shenan Stanley" <newshelper@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:u5eei8EOIHA.3816@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
- Posted by Allan on December 7th, 2007
"Fabio Martins" <support.novell@fabiomartins.net> wrote in message
news:uYjHPlEOIHA.1188@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
tens of peers at the same time. For this reason some BT clients limit to
eight the number of connections when running on Windows. I used to get these
security errors when downloading .torrents until I read the documentation
but I have never installed the workaround.
- Posted by TonySper on December 7th, 2007
Fabio,
You are taking a lot of heat. Try this site.
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/314882
It pretty much tells all.
TonySper
"Fabio Martins" <support.novell@fabiomartins.net> wrote in message
news:uYjHPlEOIHA.1188@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
- Posted by John John on December 7th, 2007
Allan wrote:
You are talking about a different thing, try here:
http://www.lvllord.de/?lang=en&url=news Read the FAQ.
John
- Posted by Allan on December 7th, 2007
"John John" <audetweld@nbnet.nb.ca> wrote in message
news:uH%23aT$GOIHA.2208@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
understand what the distinction is. All I know is that some applications
require more than ten connections at a time. I guess we just have to live
with it.
- Posted by Xandros on December 7th, 2007
"VanguardLH" <VanguardLH@mail.invalid> wrote in message
news:uXnG%23aFOIHA.820@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
Geez, how rude.
--
Xandros
- Posted by VanguardLH on December 7th, 2007
"Xandros" <arron.neus*remove*@gmailcom> wrote in message
news:Oed2v%23IOIHA.4136@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
Geez, how lazy.
- Posted by Xandros on December 7th, 2007
"VanguardLH" <VanguardLH@mail.invalid> wrote in message
news:uLzzRWMOIHA.5524@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
Geez, how repetitive.
--
Xandros
- Posted by VanguardLH on December 7th, 2007
"Xandros" <arron.neus*remove*@gmailcom> wrote in message
news:eyK4nxNOIHA.4476@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
Geez, how non-cognizant you are of the thread starter.
- Posted by Xandros on December 9th, 2007
"VanguardLH" <VanguardLH@mail.invalid> wrote in message
news:ep4eiJROIHA.4176@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
Geez, I'm embarrassed all to shit.
--
Xandros
- Posted by Allan on December 14th, 2007
"John John" <audetweld@nbnet.nb.ca> wrote in message
news:uH%23aT$GOIHA.2208@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
the distinction. I am running a standalone computer with dial-up connection
so I don't think it affects me. Thanks for the website reference again, I
have bookmarked it.
