Tech Support > Computers & Technology > Computer Security > How does the new anti spam SPF work regarding the senders email address ?
How does the new anti spam SPF work regarding the senders email address ?
Posted by Frank Callone on October 16th, 2004


SPF (Sender permitted from) seems to be the neew next anti spam technology.
But how does it treat the senders email address in the "from" header field of a mail?

Is it allowed to change the from field after introduction of SPF?
Or is only the senders IP address unchangeable ?

The problem is that on my computer there are a couple of people occasionally working
(and sending email to our only provider).
From this internet provider we got 1 email address (and one email account on the his server).

Currently we can change the sender email address from user to user e.g.
karl@xxxxx.com
peter@xxxxx.com
paul@xxxxx.com

Is this possible with SPF or do we really have to buy an extra upgrade to a multi account package?

Frank

Posted by Sam on October 16th, 2004


Frank Callone writes:

SPF defines how to determine what a domain thinks about the relationship
between a particular IP address, and an E-mail address in the domain in
question. All SPF implementations use this to determine whether to accept
an E-mail message originating at a particular IP address, and carrying a
particular envelope return address.

However, there's no technical barrier to substituting the envelope return
address with the address in the From: header; and checking that relationship
in addition to, or instead of, the traditional check that uses the envelope
return address. If an individual site chooses to do something like that,
it's certainly their privilege to operate their mail servers in whatever
way they see fit. And, I'm sure that quite a few organizations configure
their mail servers to do just that.

Earlier this year Microsoft proposed a validation scheme for the From:
header, that's based on SPF. Microsoft submitted their proposal to the IETF
MARID working group for standardization purposes; however Microsoft
also announced patent claims on their "Sender ID" proposal. Because
Microsoft was unwilling to use patent licensing terms that were acceptable
to the open source community, Microsoft's Sender ID proposal was ultimately
rejected.

None of that has any relevance to SPF.


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBBcaRTx9p3GYHlUOIRAoNQAJ9X21aAuME9XMKSzGTj7C 5CKtAghACeNt1+
fnkESse6XwuJh3WJ5Qfqao0=
=Qj+p
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Posted by Jonathan de Boyne Pollard on October 18th, 2004


FC> SPF (Sender permitted from) seems to be the neew next anti spam
FC> technology.

You're about 15 months behind. SPF isn't new any more, and gradually
people are coming to the same realisation that those well-versed in the
field came to last year, namely that (despite the marketing hyperbole
plastered all over its web site) it doesn't really deal with UBM at all.

<URL:http://homepages.tesco.net./~J.deBoynePollard/FGA/smtp-spf-is-harmful.html>

FC> But how does it treat the senders email address in the "from" header
FC> field of a mail?

You're about 12 months behind on that one. (Hint: There's been a
kerfuffle about patents on that particular subject.)


Similar Posts