Tech Support > Computers & Technology > Computer Security > Truecrypt 5.0 Released (now with system partition encryption)
Truecrypt 5.0 Released (now with system partition encryption)
Posted by Sebastian G. on February 10th, 2008


nemo_outis wrote:



It's not a hack, since nothing is manipulated.

Posted by Sebastian G. on February 10th, 2008


nemo_outis wrote:



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chain_l...ger_progra ms

And it's no hack since it doesn't require any modifications. heck, it's even
a part or the IBM PC / PS/2 specification.

Posted by nemo_outis on February 10th, 2008


"Sebastian G." <seppi@seppig.de> wrote in
news:618jukF1tb8hhU1@mid.dfncis.de:

Whose goal? And why?

Regards,


Posted by nemo_outis on February 10th, 2008


"Sebastian G." <seppi@seppig.de> wrote in
news:618k32F1tb8hhU2@mid.dfncis.de:

Peachy! And what the hell will this Windows boot loader then do when all
the HDs on the system (possibly including track zero) are encrypted?

Regards,



Posted by nemo_outis on February 10th, 2008


"Sebastian G." <seppi@seppig.de> wrote in news:618k74F1tb8hhU3
@mid.dfncis.de:

Peachy! Except:

1) Microsoft does not support others' boot loaders, and
2) the Windows boot sector, NTLDR, and the rest are all sitting encrypted
on the HDs.

Regards,

Posted by nemo_outis on February 10th, 2008


"Sebastian G." <seppi@seppig.de> wrote in news:618k83F1tb8hhU4
@mid.dfncis.de:

It is a hack since Microsoft doesn't support it.

Regards,


Posted by nemo_outis on February 10th, 2008


"Sebastian G." <seppi@seppig.de> wrote in
news:618kkdF1tpsfvU2@mid.dfncis.de:

It is a hack since Microsoft doesn't support it.

Wanna go round again?

Regards,



Posted by Sebastian G. on February 10th, 2008


nemo_outis wrote:


Well, couldn't you tell us that your stupid way earlier?

Posted by Sebastian G. on February 10th, 2008


nemo_outis wrote:


Working exactly the same way as the pre-boot stuff?

Posted by Sebastian G. on February 10th, 2008


nemo_outis wrote:



If you're expecting anything but a *PLONK* then you're even more stupid than
you've already presented yourself so far.

Posted by Sebastian G. on February 10th, 2008


nemo_outis, the dirty mail address faker wrote:

If you're expecting anything but a *PLONK* then you're even more stupid than
you've already presented yourself so far.

Posted by Nomen Nescio on February 10th, 2008


nemo_outis wrote:

You mean this...

"The chapter explains why BestCrypt Volume Encryption (a line in
BestCrypt family of encryption software products) has got Volume
Encryption name. Many people may think that Volume Encryption is the
same as Partition Encryption or even Whole Disk Encryption. Sometimes
it is really so, but not always, and it is worth to learn about the
difference."

*snicker*


Posted by George Orwell on February 10th, 2008


nemo_outis wrote:

"The chapter explains why BestCrypt Volume Encryption (a line in
BestCrypt family of encryption software products) has got Volume
Encryption name. Many people may think that Volume Encryption is the
same as Partition Encryption or even Whole Disk Encryption. Sometimes
it is really so, but not always, and it is worth to learn about the
difference."

Il mittente di questo messaggio|The sender address of this
non corrisponde ad un utente |message is not related to a real
reale ma all'indirizzo fittizio|person but to a fake address of an
di un sistema anonimizzatore |anonymous system
Per maggiori informazioni |For more info
https://www.mixmaster.it


Posted by Anonymous on February 10th, 2008


nemo_outis wrote:

You mean this...

"The chapter explains why BestCrypt Volume Encryption (a line in
BestCrypt family of encryption software products) has got Volume
Encryption name. Many people may think that Volume Encryption is the
same as Partition Encryption or even Whole Disk Encryption. Sometimes
it is really so, but not always, and it is worth to learn about the
difference."

*snicker*


Posted by nemo_outis on February 10th, 2008


"Sebastian G." <seppi@seppig.de> wrote in
news:618qlkF1tq8ooU1@mid.dfncis.de:


If you weren't so stupid you would have picked up that I have been telling
you this repeatedly in a number of previous posts.

Regards,

Posted by nemo_outis on February 10th, 2008


"Sebastian G." <seppi@seppig.de> wrote in
news:618qo2F1tq8ooU2@mid.dfncis.de:

I have no idea what your question means - and neither, I suspect, do you.

Regards,



Posted by nemo_outis on February 10th, 2008


"Sebastian G." <seppi@seppig.de> wrote in
news:618qq9F1tq8ooU3@mid.dfncis.de:


Sebastian, to be plonked by you and never again have you make another of
your idiotic replies to my posts would be heaven on earth.

Regards,



Posted by nemo_outis on February 10th, 2008


"Sebastian G." <seppi@seppig.de> wrote in
news:618qtsF1tq8ooU4@mid.dfncis.de:

Sebastian, to be plonked by you and never again have you make another of
your idiotic replies to my posts would be heaven on earth.

Regards,

Posted by nemo_outis on February 10th, 2008


You still don't understand. Reread what Bestcrypt has to say again.

Regards,


Posted by nemo_outis on February 10th, 2008


You still don't understand. Reread what Bestcrypt has to say again.

Regards,



Similar Posts