- Another idiot
- Posted by Damian on March 23rd, 2005
Who's this cunt:
susiehxu@tpg.com.au
Tried (in vain) to send me a virus. Must be a linuxfuck to think that others
are as stupid as she is.
- Posted by spike1@freenet.co.uk on March 23rd, 2005
Damian <nospam@rabid-dog.net> wrote:
Oh dearohdeadohdear...
Can't accept the fact that viruses are the last things on our minds. We just
don't even bother thinking about them unless mails need scanning before
being passed onto a windows network.
So why would we have any viruses to send you?
windows makes you stupid.
- Posted by spike1@freenet.co.uk on March 23rd, 2005
Damian <nospam@rabid-dog.net> wrote:
Oh dearohdeadohdear...
Can't accept the fact that viruses are the last things on our minds. We just
don't even bother thinking about them unless mails need scanning before
being passed onto a windows network.
So why would we have any viruses to send you?
windows makes you stupid.
- Posted by Barney on March 23rd, 2005
"Damian" <nospam@rabid-dog.net> had
writtennews:3adhbqF68sisjU1@individual.net:
you a virus directly. Most virus/trogans copy address's from a address
book and sends on from those address's. How many were sent from yours?
--
Barney __________________________
Wisdom from the sleeping dogs!
- Posted by Barney on March 23rd, 2005
"Damian" <nospam@rabid-dog.net> had
writtennews:3adhbqF68sisjU1@individual.net:
you a virus directly. Most virus/trogans copy address's from a address
book and sends on from those address's. How many were sent from yours?
--
Barney __________________________
Wisdom from the sleeping dogs!
- Posted by Richard Rasker on March 23rd, 2005
Op Wed, 23 Mar 2005 07:47:03 -0800, schreef Damian:
Well, I'd say it's a typical Windows user. Let's fire up good 'ole
Google Groups and see what turns up. Aha, there it is:
"Susie Xu" <susiehxu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:42172658$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au...
Yup, it's a Windows user allright - which of course comes as no surprise ...
Are you really this stupid? How do you know this person is actually the
sender of the virus? I bet you just looked at the From: header, which of
course says nothing. And how would a *Linux user* spread viruses? On
purpose? From his/her own address? This may be your level of intelligence
and deviousness; most Linux users, however, are way smarter than this. As
are, by the way, most fruit flies.
Richard Rasker
--
Linetec Translation and Technology Services
http://www.linetec.nl/
- Posted by Jose Maria Lopez Hernandez on March 23rd, 2005
Damian wrote:
You are angry 'couse someone sent you a virus?
I receive 50 or 60 a day. It's the first thing I do when
I wake up, deleting all the viruses I receive.
Regards.
--
Jose Maria Lopez Hernandez
Director Tecnico de bgSEC
jkerouac@bgsec.com
bgSEC Seguridad y Consultoria de Sistemas Informaticos
http://www.bgsec.com
ESPAÑA
The only people for me are the mad ones -- the ones who are mad to live,
mad to talk, mad to be saved, desirous of everything at the same time,
the ones who never yawn or say a commonplace thing, but burn, burn, burn
like fabulous yellow Roman candles.
-- Jack Kerouac, "On the Road"
- Posted by Jose Maria Lopez Hernandez on March 23rd, 2005
Damian wrote:
You are angry 'couse someone sent you a virus?
I receive 50 or 60 a day. It's the first thing I do when
I wake up, deleting all the viruses I receive.
Regards.
--
Jose Maria Lopez Hernandez
Director Tecnico de bgSEC
jkerouac@bgsec.com
bgSEC Seguridad y Consultoria de Sistemas Informaticos
http://www.bgsec.com
ESPAÑA
The only people for me are the mad ones -- the ones who are mad to live,
mad to talk, mad to be saved, desirous of everything at the same time,
the ones who never yawn or say a commonplace thing, but burn, burn, burn
like fabulous yellow Roman candles.
-- Jack Kerouac, "On the Road"
- Posted by Damian on March 23rd, 2005
spike1@freenet.co.uk wrote:
linuxfucks are responsible for everything that is wrong or bad in the world.
Why can't you understand that?
linux makes you stupid.
- Posted by Damian on March 23rd, 2005
spike1@freenet.co.uk wrote:
linuxfucks are responsible for everything that is wrong or bad in the world.
Why can't you understand that?
linux makes you stupid.
- Posted by 14 Stone Ninja on March 23rd, 2005
Richard Rasker spamtrap@linetec.nl, wrote in message
an.2005.03.23.17.01.16.363200@linetec.nl:
Seems you are.
- Posted by TCS on March 23rd, 2005
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 19:49:33 +0000, 14 Stone Ninja <14stoneninja@fearlessmotherfucker.com> wrote:
I see the third grader's "No, you are" argument is alive and well.
If you're going to do it right, you should also make fun of the person's
name.
- Posted by Lord Gazwad of Grantham on March 23rd, 2005
TCS, <The-Central-Scrutinizer@p.o.b.o.x.com>, the nearsighted, degenerate
gnome, and tax collector, alleged:
And you're yet another stupid cunt who cannot discern the difference between
"this" and "that".
--
For my own part, I have never had a thought which I could not set down
in words with even more distinctness than that with which I conceived
it. There is, however, a class of fancies of exquisite delicacy which
are not thoughts, and to which as yet I have found it absolutely
impossible to adapt to language. These fancies arise in the soul, alas
how rarely. Only at epochs of most intense tranquillity, when the
bodily and mental health are in perfection. And at those weird points
of time, where the confines of the waking world blend with the world of
dreams. And so I captured this fancy, where all that we see, or seem,
is but a dream within a dream.
- Posted by Lookout on March 23rd, 2005
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 19:24:03 +0100, Jose Maria Lopez Hernandez
<jkerouac@bgsec.com> wrote:
50 or 60 a day? What did you do to get that? And don't say 'nothing'
because NO ONE gets that many.
- Posted by Lookout on March 23rd, 2005
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 19:24:03 +0100, Jose Maria Lopez Hernandez
<jkerouac@bgsec.com> wrote:
50 or 60 a day? What did you do to get that? And don't say 'nothing'
because NO ONE gets that many.
- Posted by Jose Maria Lopez Hernandez on March 23rd, 2005
Lookout wrote:
I just post in quite a lot of newsgroups, the Security Focus
lists and the netfilter and snort lists, with my real email.
They even send virus to other accounts in the bgSEC webpage,
I suppose because they find it in Google.
Most of them are just Windopes with virus in their computers,
but many of them have forged headers, so they send them
knowing what they are doing. I receive some of them from some
sites almost everyday.
I don't care at all. I find it even useful, because I save the
new ones to use them in my security related jobs.
Regards.
--
Jose Maria Lopez Hernandez
Director Tecnico de bgSEC
jkerouac@bgsec.com
bgSEC Seguridad y Consultoria de Sistemas Informaticos
http://www.bgsec.com
ESPAÑA
The only people for me are the mad ones -- the ones who are mad to live,
mad to talk, mad to be saved, desirous of everything at the same time,
the ones who never yawn or say a commonplace thing, but burn, burn, burn
like fabulous yellow Roman candles.
-- Jack Kerouac, "On the Road"
- Posted by Jose Maria Lopez Hernandez on March 23rd, 2005
Lookout wrote:
I just post in quite a lot of newsgroups, the Security Focus
lists and the netfilter and snort lists, with my real email.
They even send virus to other accounts in the bgSEC webpage,
I suppose because they find it in Google.
Most of them are just Windopes with virus in their computers,
but many of them have forged headers, so they send them
knowing what they are doing. I receive some of them from some
sites almost everyday.
I don't care at all. I find it even useful, because I save the
new ones to use them in my security related jobs.
Regards.
--
Jose Maria Lopez Hernandez
Director Tecnico de bgSEC
jkerouac@bgsec.com
bgSEC Seguridad y Consultoria de Sistemas Informaticos
http://www.bgsec.com
ESPAÑA
The only people for me are the mad ones -- the ones who are mad to live,
mad to talk, mad to be saved, desirous of everything at the same time,
the ones who never yawn or say a commonplace thing, but burn, burn, burn
like fabulous yellow Roman candles.
-- Jack Kerouac, "On the Road"
- Posted by The Ghost In The Machine on March 23rd, 2005
In comp.os.linux.advocacy, Damian
<nospam@rabid-dog.net>
wrote
on Wed, 23 Mar 2005 10:46:34 -0800
<3adrsdF693j3uU1@individual.net>:
And you'd fix this problem precisely how?
--
#191, ewill3@earthlink.net
It's still legal to go .sigless.
- Posted by The Ghost In The Machine on March 23rd, 2005
In comp.os.linux.advocacy, Damian
<nospam@rabid-dog.net>
wrote
on Wed, 23 Mar 2005 10:46:34 -0800
<3adrsdF693j3uU1@individual.net>:
And you'd fix this problem precisely how?
--
#191, ewill3@earthlink.net
It's still legal to go .sigless.
- Posted by Leigh Knox-Ux on March 23rd, 2005
Jose Maria Lopez Hernandez wrote:
I can't imagine why that might be...
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
jkerouac@bgsec.com
