- in depth details
- Posted by ice berg on February 27th, 2006
all,
Need detailed explanation about the flow(source code to executable
code conversion in c language).please reply asap
regards
ice berg
- Posted by Chadwick Stone© on February 27th, 2006
X-No-Archive: YES
ice berg [akasokan@gmail.com] has entered into testimony
1141027724.544289.74880@z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.c om
Sure thing, sparky!
--
Skepticult® Member# 581-00504-208
ChadwickStone at Gmail dot com
Usenet's most helpful netizen
Hammer of Thor, March 2005
- Posted by Mitch on February 27th, 2006
In article <1141027724.544289.74880@z34g2000cwc.googlegroups. com>, ice
berg <akasokan@gmail.com> wrote:
Not too damn demanding, huh?
Isn't that something you can learn at a Web site?
And isn't your request a bit general?
I mean, how much of a response do you expect or need? It's gotta be
enough to fill a book.
- Posted by pistha on February 27th, 2006
Not too demanding??, if so , please answer this .
- Posted by Whiskers on February 27th, 2006
On 2006-02-27, ice berg <akasokan@gmail.com> wrote:
Source --> compiler --> binary
--
-- ^^^^^^^^^^
-- Whiskers
-- ~~~~~~~~~~
- Posted by Steve on February 27th, 2006
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 14:21:02 +0000, Whiskers wrote:
He won't get an 'A' for that lmao
--
Steve
?wollof ot drah yllaer sdaerht sekam gnitsop-pot taht erawa uoy ereW
- Posted by Whiskers on February 27th, 2006
On 2006-02-27, Steve <steve@steve.invalid> wrote:
It's all he'll get from me 
) (Not least because that's all I know!)
--
-- ^^^^^^^^^^
-- Whiskers
-- ~~~~~~~~~~
- Posted by why? on February 27th, 2006
X-No-Archive: Yes
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 20:53:09 +0000, Whiskers wrote:
Here is an A+ then , well the little bit more I remember.
Source - PreProcessor - Assembler - (Libraries) - Object Code - Linker -
Binary
Me
- Posted by why? on February 27th, 2006
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 20:53:09 +0000, Whiskers wrote:
reposted , removed the no archive this time : -) seems to be an issue in
a delay selecting / deleting since using VNC. Oh well.
Here is an A+ then , well the little bit more I remember.
Source - PreProcessor - Assembler - (Libraries) - Object Code - Linker -
Binary
Me
- Posted by Chadwick Stone© on February 28th, 2006
X-No-Archive: YES
pistha [akasokan@gmail.com] has entered into testimony
1141044204.207039.293180@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups. com
Read a book!
Sign up for a class!
Ask someone you know!
As clueless as you obviously are, rendering an indepth explanation of
converting source code to machine language would be like trying to teach
algebra to a cat.
--
Skepticult® Member# 581-00504-208
ChadwickStone at Gmail dot com
Usenet's most helpful netizen
Hammer of Thor, March 2005
- Posted by Chadwick Stone© on February 28th, 2006
X-No-Archive: YES
why? [fgrirp*sgc@VAINY!Qznq.fpvragvfg.pbz] has entered into testimony
r2t6021e8r2t2ol2e1p2qiq85b4fmlgr85@4ax.com
Before these bloatware guis became all the rage and developers were more
concerned with memory, there was an EXE2BIN distribution that came with
MSDOS which would generate a .COM file from the executable provided it
met some special requirements such as being able to be resident within a
single segment of memory, etc. I do recall that there were ways around
that particular limitation by using multiple near calls and some segment
register trickery.
Ah, the days of real coding when you actually used a keyboard to type
instructions rather than a mouse to drag and drop cutesy little controls
and check off options.
--
Skepticult® Member# 581-00504-208
ChadwickStone at Gmail dot com
Usenet's most helpful netizen
Hammer of Thor, March 2005
- Posted by Whiskers on February 28th, 2006
X-No-Archive: Yes
On 2006-02-28, Chadwick Stone© <chad_stone@127.0.0.1> wrote:
snip
Some of us still do it that way )
--
-- ^^^^^^^^^^
-- Whiskers
-- ~~~~~~~~~~
- Posted by why? on February 28th, 2006
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 02:29:46 GMT, Chadwick Stone© wrote:
<snip>
Used that a a lot and somewhere still around is my MASM disks and books
, Turbo pascal 3 (IIRC) for DOS.
Too right it was better, taught you how to use 64K to the most, with
tight coding and no bloat.
Not only did one have to know the CPU but it's quirks as well. At one
point I was doing stuff on Z80, 8080, 6502, 6809 and 68000. Miss all the
fun.
Me
