- Drive Image: which is the latest version?
- Posted by Fogar on April 17th, 2004
Hi, I'd like to know the latest version of Drive Image.
Another question please:
Is it newer Drive Image v7.0 or Drive Image 2000?
Thanks
bye Fogar
- Posted by Kenny on April 17th, 2004
DI 7 is 2002, DI 6 is 2000. DI 6 will not work with XP, you need DI 7.
--
Kenny
"Fogar" <alvmos@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:s7l180ddr6mb5r7rpdl42gog1c4vlc8mr1@4ax.com...
- Posted by Fogar on April 17th, 2004
Thanks for your pleasant news.
Can you tell me if I have to installa also ".Framework"?
I know there are two ".Framework"
1) Microsoft .NET Framework versione 1.1
2) Microsoft® .NET Framework Version 1.1 Redistributable Package
The second .NET Framework is very heavier. Can I install the first
one? Will Drive Image work?
thanks
bye Fogar
- Posted by Kenny on April 17th, 2004
I "think" it was NET Framework V1.1, not redistributable which I had to
install for DI 7.
--
Kenny
"Fogar" <alvmos@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:j7q1805lic1t0fj98ha3ae5gea20p5532o@4ax.com...
- Posted by Fogar on April 17th, 2004
I'm sorry, I haven't understood.
Can you explain better me, please?
A friend of mine told me NET Framework is not necessary.
Is it necessary for Drive Image v7.0?
tahnks
- Posted by Fred on April 17th, 2004
"Fogar" <alvmos@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3v42805eh1mrd7o8fdkh7mma0pcia09tu1@4ax.com...
It is clearly stated on the Drive Image site that Microsoft .NET Framework
is REQUIRED FOR ALL INSTALLATIONS
http://www.powerquest.com/driveimage/sys_req.html
How to Get the .NET Framework 1.1
http://msdn.microsoft.com/netframewo...t/default.aspx
- Posted by Michael Rainey on April 17th, 2004
"Kenny" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:c5qnen$4b6oq$1@ID-216051.news.uni-berlin.de...
I use Drive Image 5 with XP. Following info comes from the LangaList
newsletter:
That alone might be enough to rule out DI7 for many people, but there's
more: DI7 itself is a porker, weighing in at 45MB, so an installation
will actually take an incredible 85MB when you include the mandatory
..Net installation.
Recall that DI5 could be made to fit on a single floppy, if you wanted
it to--- just 1.44MB for essentially similar functionality to what now
requires 85MB. Talk about bloat!
Yes, DI2002 *can* work on XP. In fact, if you dig deep enough in the
PowerQuest site, you can find their old recommendations from when DI2002
came out--- they list XP (and Win2K) as supported systems. For that
matter, the even-older DI5 can work fine on XP--- it's what I use, and
as I said in the newsletter, I think DI5 on XP is actually superior to
DI7 on XP. So I emphatically was NOT saying "Nothing but DI7 will work
on XP and Win2K..."
