richard <I.dont.care@do.you> wrote in
news:2k90s3lr2piab9knvsv999g2auvu6onla3@4ax.com:


Here's the thing about *most* cop-shops:

If they'd do their fucking jobs right in the first place,
they wouldn't be experiencing any unpredictable overloads.

This [general] situation is case-in-point. Clearly those
papapoopsizes are violating citizens' privacy, conducting
themselves with obviously and flagrante delicto patterns
of reckless endangerment, assault, stalking, harassment,
etc., etc., etc. Not to mention the traffic crimes...

If the cops would simply bust a couple of these perps at
the incident and the court system(s) would make an
appropriate retribution, more than adequately provided for
in the current laws, then the crap would stop.

Personally, I don't care if they harass Britney Skank and
Paris Deep-Throat, but they *need* to LEAVE LINDSAY ALONE,
OR I'M TAKIN' IT TO YouTube!!!

And, I *really* mean it!

(LOL)

--

My name is Bucky Breeder and I approve this message!

http://nymag.com/fashion/08/spring/lindsay-as-marilyn/

richard <I.dont.care@do.you> wrote in
news:jkg0s3pi4dudc8v1skve3lsvd7f9dkj508@4ax.com:

If someone were on a skateboard, or carrying a basketball, or tossing
a frisbee, the cops would arrest them... at least eventually.

But the camera, and a very bad miscarriage of "freedom of the press"
principle are the intstrumentalities of abuse here. There are most
certainly laws against stalking and harassment in every (US)
jurisdiction. There are laws against defamation as well. I'm at
a loss to understand the "benefit" of showing some celebrities'
embarrassing moments because camera-toting hooligans were allowed
to be there with no reasonable facsimile of law and order being
present to curtail the disturbances. Not to mention them pushing
those cameras and microphones up into faces without regard for
safety or civility. That's why I believe some of our taxpayers'
money would be better spent on prosecuting a few of the more
egregious cases than, case-in-point, LAPD becoming baby-sitters
for celebrities.

In the case of Princess Diana's demise, I do believe had there
been have been criminal prosecutions prior to the incident,
then the event might well have not happened. Unfortunately,
I believe the press has discreetly alluded to the probablility
that there were drugs and alcohol contributing to those events.

I'm not a big fan of Dinana's - but in sort of way, especially
as a child, when they got married it was sort of like a fairy
tale coming true, so in that way it was very cool. But Diana
should have assumed some of the dignity and at the very least
some of the decorum that goes with becoming "royality" for the
respect of the institution... But she ran around very publically
and shot off her mouth and made it sort of a Jerry Springer Show
with jewels... I dunno, very sad all around, IMO.

(Although I do enjoy the occasional camel-toe exposè or nip-slip
shot... Drats, I guess I'm part of the problem. Oh well.)

--

My name is Bucky Breeder and I approve this message!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ye5Jo1I4XXc

http://www.shibuecouture.com/cartima...rge/hearts.jpg

(This one is *cool* because if you hover your cursor on the
picture and then left-click back and forth really fast, it's
like you're putting your face in her nethers rather than just
resizing the picture... Yay!)

"Bucky Breeder" <not.here.now@nd.gone.fishing.tomorrow.bye> wrote in message
news:Xns9A4E6D781FD06VulcanMimeMelt@216.151.153.34 ...
She spoiled her chance to be Royalty by jumping in the sack with every guy
she could and never even tried to cover it up or be "discrete"about it. In
short she was a gold digging slut