Tech Support > Computers & Technology > Question about Weight
Question about Weight
Posted by Michael Garcia on July 5th, 2003


Can someone tell me if something's weight is 24.1 kg how much is that in
English?


Posted by mpg on July 5th, 2003


Thanks Jim
"Jimchip" <jimchip@localdomain.invalid> wrote in message
news:vge5g6f63suga8@news.supernews.com...


Posted by °Mike° on July 5th, 2003


One kilogram is 2.204622622 pounds (avoirdupois), so:

24.1 x 2.204622622 = 53.13140519 lbs

or 53 lbs, 2 oz.


On Sat, 05 Jul 2003 18:12:43 GMT, in
<vyENa.82298$Io.7427657@newsread2.prod.itd.earthli nk.net>
Michael Garcia scrawled:

--
STGP, OGPE24HSHD

Posted by Slumpy on July 5th, 2003


"So, Mr Slumpy you *really* are the perpetual comedian, aren't you ?" I
threw back my head and roared with laughter as Michael Garcia continued:

53 lbs.
--
slumpy
no more
no less
just slumpy



Posted by anthonyberet on July 5th, 2003


Michael Garcia wrote:
24,100 grammes.
--
Put "usenet" in the subject-line if you want to mail me, otherwise it will
bounce.
anthonyberet



Posted by kill da rabbit on July 5th, 2003


Slumpy wrote:
Empirical = Lbs
Metric = Kg
Weird English thing = Stone

Takes a fortnight to figure out for some.


Posted by paul s on July 6th, 2003


Michael Garcia wrote:

I dont understand these French weights.
--
Paul S

Posted by kill da rabbit on July 6th, 2003


paul s wrote:
que?


Posted by PhilGreg on July 6th, 2003



"Slumpy" <me3@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:be7ikp$2337p$1@ID-105330.news.dfncis.de...
==> 53.1314lbs [advp] <BG>. On the other hand, if it's goverment work
your answer is exact<GBG>

--
Phil

\\\///
( o o )
--------oOOO-- ( )--OOOo------
pgregory@c.tel.net








Posted by Slumpy on July 6th, 2003


"So, Mr Slumpy you *really* are the perpetual comedian, aren't you ?" I
threw back my head and roared with laughter as PhilGreg continued:

Well as I did the calculation in my head without any outside help, webpages,
etc etc I think I done pretty good.
--
slumpy
no more
no less
just slumpy



Posted by Gary G. Taylor on July 6th, 2003


kill da rabbit wrote:


--
Gary G. Taylor * Rialto, CA
gary at cdfound dot org / http:// geetee dot cdfound dot org
"The two most abundant things in the universe
are hydrogen and stupidity." --Harlan Ellison

Posted by Phil L. B. on July 6th, 2003


On Sun, 06 Jul 2003 00:04:54 GMT, paul s <nospam@nospam.forme> wrote:


Posted by Brian H¹© on July 6th, 2003


X-No-Archive: Yes
Errrrr...erm... Phil L. B. said:

Kilos, ounces, it'll still take him the same time to snort it all.

--
www.absey-vine.co.uk/
freeware, helpdesk, ad-aware



Posted by Brian H¹© on July 6th, 2003


X-No-Archive: Yes
Errrrr...erm... ilmc said:

I tried snorting it once, but almost drowned.

--
www.absey-vine.co.uk/
freeware, helpdesk, ad-aware



Posted by ilmc on July 6th, 2003


X-No-Archive: Yes
Brian H¹© typed:
On the coke again?



Posted by Slumpy on July 6th, 2003


"So, Mr Slumpy you *really* are the perpetual comedian, aren't you ?" I
threw back my head and roared with laughter as Brian H¹© continued:

Mmmm could do with something to give me a smiley right now myself. Unless
you know a contract killer in the UK who does credit ?
--
slumpy
no more
no less
just slumpy



Posted by Michael on July 6th, 2003


In news:vyENa.82298$Io.7427657@newsread2.prod.itd.ear thlink.net,
Michael Garcia <paul419@earthlink.net> wrote:

Multiply by 2.2 (or double it and add 10%) and you'll get 53 pounds, give or
take part of an ounce.

If you're wondering about that big sack of BC Bud stashed in the attic,
wonder no more: it's worth about the same as your house.

((U))
M



Posted by ilmc on July 6th, 2003


X-No-Archive: Yes
Slumpy typed:
Lost OP.
Pity the poor Yanks. Their pints only have 16 oz



Posted by Ski on July 7th, 2003



Lost OP...
try

http://www.joshmadison.com/software/convert/

Ski






Posted by paul s on July 8th, 2003


Phil L. B. wrote:

Thats the trouble with the UK. I can buy a *pint* of beer, but then the pub
has metric 35centilitre optics.

All my groceries are sold by the
gram/kilogram/millilitre/litre/centimetre/whatever, but then all the
roadsigns are in yards/miles.

I dont know how the airlines manage. I listen quite a bit to airband, they
talk about visibility distances in *metres* , and altitudes in *feet* . In
fact there was a very dangerous case of a metric imperial conversion cockup
in Canada a few years ago. The pilot ordered so many pounds of Jet-A fuel,
the airport had just gone over to metric, result the aircraft ran out of
fuel in mid-flight. There was a TV-movie made about it.

--
Paul S


Similar Posts