Anonymous Sender wrote:

[snip]

Subject: Goats and inanimate objects soon to be hitched!

So, why shouldn't devil worshippers be allowed to marry?


--
TehGhodTrole: Trolling, for God's sake.
Your Free Insult: Jesus loves you.

"TehGhodTrole" <nospam@rainx.cjb.net> wrote...
Anonymous? Yea, it figures!


Over the last two hundred years in the United States the law has
evolved to redefine "equal rights under the law" to include all races,
religions, genders and national origins. It therefore seems perfectly
legitimate to question why an old rule for marriage previously
interpreted as "one man and one woman" could reasonably be adjusted to
"one person and one person". The attempted logical leap of applying
two centuries of equal rights among people of different color,
religion and sex to somehow also apply to goats and inanimate objects
or even polygamy makes no sense at all.

I also find it confusing that conservatives hail the family as the
backbone of America but then attempt to restrict loving couples from
getting married. This also makes no rational sense.

Mark Fox wrote:
Only when I choose it as an option and fail to set
it back to post out of my own newsserver. It gets done
because I haven't yet dealt with a bug that causes NNTP
posts over 9KB to hang my user agent.

Since the headers in this post, and all the headers in most
of all my other posts, directly refute the implied slur, the
rest of what you wrote is snipped unread on account of you
seemingly being easily led to false conclusions without
much effort at all. That includes a clear inference that
you seem to believe that the posting host of a message
somehow invalidates the content of a post and what it
might be arguing.

Congratulations, you are officially a nitwit.


--
TehGhodTrole: Trolling, for God's sake.
Your Free Insult: Jesus loves you.

"TehGhodTrole" <nospam@rainx.cjb.net> wrote in message news:<5eMGuCD0E4EY65FB482FOnxZU1t4INtH@news.reprom s.si>...

So what's her name, you lucky guy? Is it Nanny?

"Goats and inanimate objects soon to be hitched!"

I like what Bill Maher said on Real Time Friday to point out the
fallacy in this reasoning:
giving women the right to vote didn't lead to hamsters getting the
right to vote

Mark Fox wrote:

Gosh, I guess you told me!

When you finish mumbling your "message header" gibberish how about you
read and respond to the comment I posted?


frizzlefry99@msn.com (Kevin King) wrote in message...

Thats a good observation, Frizz.

beloved_citizen@yahoo.com (Beloved Citizen) wrote...
He knows he is too weak to resist marrying that goat so he wants to
make sure there is a law against it.

Mark Fox wrote:

The blithering was all yours. I don't respond to questions
from blithering idiots. If you like to respond to questions from
blithering idiots, go and talk to a mirror.


--
TehGhodTrole: Trolling, for God's sake.
Your Free Insult: Jesus loves you.

Mark Fox wrote:

"TehGhodTrole" <nospam@rainx.cjb.net> responded:


Yea, that's a useful and intelligent response.