Tech Support > Computers & Technology > What makes Linux a superior desktop Os to Vista?
What makes Linux a superior desktop Os to Vista?
Posted by 7 on November 12th, 2006


asstroturfer Mareeba wrote on behalf of micoshaft corporation:


Well here in your have first in a series of problems.

1. pasta la vista is not an OS. It is a virus you purchase and install
if you have fool written all over you.
2. And then you pay.
You will have a computer that doesn't do anything much different
and catching this new virus has lost you hours,
days and weeks to get some small bits working, leaving the
remainder unfinished. Can you really afford all your data to be
lost like this so frequently?
3. You could catch this virus if you are a dumbo working in a company
and then you download and install it on any PC without management
approval.
4. Worse still, after that initial download, this virus will be too
slow, and the viri writers are relying on windopze zealotic bum boys
to sneak it on to faster machines without management approval to
get it to work.
5. Even more worse than that, because there are so many varieties,
your windopz bum boy trained in the ways of sneakiness are
going to distort the truth in order to get hold of more pricey
versions of pasta by hoodwinking management and insisting
they need it when they don't. Like little gurls, they are going
to start crying and rolling on the floor, pretending they
can't live without it, when they can.
6. Pasta is actually expee SP3. Shocking isn't it. Yet you must
pay hundreds of dollars for it.
7. The reason why its not called SP3 is because everyone would know then!
8. Another reason for not calling it SP3 is because it would then
it would have to be given away free to purchasers of
exppeee who's bugs still haven't been fixed yet.
9. In total I think you will agree you don't have to put up with
any of this baggage if you install free GNU/Linux OS because
it really is an OS unlike pasta.
http://www.livecdlist.com
http://www.distrowatch.com




Posted by Mr. Arnold on November 12th, 2006


7 wrote:
Is there a problem with 7?