PS. I CARE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11123

--
Brisk

x-- 100 Proof News - http://www.100ProofNews.com
x-- 3,500+ Binary NewsGroups, and over 90,000 other groups
x-- Access to over 800 Gigs/Day - $8.95/Month
x-- UNLIMITED DOWNLOAD

"dilligaf" <a@a.a> wrote in
news:6TbRa.26089$wZ1.15030@fe08.atl2.webusenet.com :

BWAHAHAHAHA! You do realise that'll he'll respond by saying it was
intentional, and keeps his company image away from the "old cow that chews
the same cud over and over again because it's become too fat and lazy to
move on to greener pastures."

/me slaps some proper business sense into Hatter

If he was half as good at designing as he is trolling, this fool would be a
millionaire \o/

--
Brisk

x-- 100 Proof News - http://www.100ProofNews.com
x-- 3,500+ Binary NewsGroups, and over 90,000 other groups
x-- Access to over 800 Gigs/Day - $8.95/Month
x-- UNLIMITED DOWNLOAD

And lest we forget, Mr Hatter is relied upon by the Care Bears community
for his sheer attention to detail, and da-vinci like quality to his
artwork. As the man himself said:

Yep, all 457 of them!!!

Such power you have! OMGWTFLMAOROFL!!!!!!!123

--
Brisk

x-- 100 Proof News - http://www.100ProofNews.com
x-- 3,500+ Binary NewsGroups, and over 90,000 other groups
x-- Access to over 800 Gigs/Day - $8.95/Month
x-- UNLIMITED DOWNLOAD

On 16 Jul 2003 10:40:05 +0100, Brisk <brisk@NOSPAMsupanet.com> wrote:

Oh this should be good. `, )

*puts on Powerman 5000 - Free and 30 Seconds To Mars - Oblivion*

I always listen to good music when I know I'm going to enjoy a post. ^_^

The form you use to reply isn't as important as the WAY you reply.

Loads instantly on my cable connection, takes about 3 minutes on a dial-up
connection...pfft, dial-up users, what good are they. ^_^

I do plan to split the site into frames so that it only needs to load once, but there are
some problems with compatibility when I do that regarding Nutscrape. Although I've also
been toying with the idea of just throwing together a script that redirects all Nutscrape
users to like www.tubgirl.com

Yeah I should be charging a lot more. Most people charge around $250 to $300. Some even
more than that.

To what precisely are you referring to? I mean that Warbonnet logo redesign, that wasn't
much fun, but it's what the guy wanted. See unlike you, Dribbles, I do what the CUSTOMER
wants. But then that's why I make more money than you.

*snicker* You're a "graphic designer", huh? Okay, well let's see some of YOUR work?
Come on, Spanky, show us all what your basis of comparison is. ^_^

*10 to 1 says the poor fool doesn't even give one example of something he's done*

In fact, I'd be willing to bet the poor fool has never even MADE a website.

Do you keep putting website in quotations because you're simple or is there some other
reason for it?

Really? How so?

Oh damn, see this is the part where you actually have to EXPLAIN your failing little
NONpinions. ^_^

Yeah and I'm sure you wield it about as well as CNN wields puns.

Oh yes, let's!

Wow, apparently you're into insulting your customers as well. Tsk, tsk, tsk...and to
think you actually wonder why you're such a FAILURE.

It's what the customer wanted, Dribbles. Again, the customer is always right. I did
offer quite a variety of ways I could do the interface but stars is what he wanted and
that's what he got.

All my sites are designed for an 800x600 res display, Cupcake. Only a fucking retard
surfs the web with a larger res than that. *snicker* Fucking amateur. And if you were
viewing the site in standard 800x600 res you wouldn't even be able to SEE my logo unless
you took the time to scroll down. See I designed it to be unobtrusive and hidden...well
except to all the idiots of the online world like you. I don't normally take the time to
make my sites idiot proof.

Again, what the customer wanted. He actually wanted midis on EVERY page, I was able to
talk him into just doing the one.

What's wrong with red on black? What are you color blind? Oh, I forgot, you're not
viewing my sites with a proper Inet browsing resolution, guess they would be hard to read
like that.

See above.

Yeah and the actual logo for that site isn't done yet either.

LOL, you notice how he CONVENIENTLY skips the actual models? He, he, he, I suppose if I
didn't spend so much of my time working on the content I could spend more time filling the
empty link spaces, but then I'm not such an earth shatteringly stupid fool like him that I
think people are coming to the site for the links. *rolls eyes*

Got a thing for fuzzy lil bears who shoot love from their tummy's, huh?

Actually it's not blurry at all (you obviously haven't learned what the selection tool
options are for) and second I reconstructed that logo from scratch from a drawing, didn't
use anything from google. Again though, yer screen res is all fucked up, so that's
probably why you think it's blurred.

And again I ask, where are your sites? ^_^

The poor stupid fool missed the "Designed For Internet Explorer" on the front of the page.
Your precious little fucktard Nutscrape doesn't support things like CSS, namely for text
shadow.

I like how you have to look at the superficial and nitpick in order to try and have an
argument. LOL It REALLY makes you look pathetic. I mean if you wanna talk about the
Care Bears site let's talk about the content, let's talk about how I have EVERY Care Bear
song ever made on the site. Let's talk about the 1,000+ images. Let's talk about the
300+ sound clips. ROTFL, again though, if you even have any sites they're probably all
design and no content. Hopefully you're NOT making sites with such an over bloated screen
res though. o_O

Uh huh. If you want to see my "best" wait until my next CCS AMV is done. Now THAT is my
"very best". I lip synched the entire song and the entire thing is being edited frame by
frame (mainly because no video editing programs have the capability to do the things I'm
doing in it).

It's far better than anything you'll ever be capable of producing, my little puke.

I'd probably reject it if I knew it was coming from you.

Your problem is that you've been doing "dummy" website design for so long you don't know
how to do it properly. I mean, come on, you're using Netscape fer keerist
sake...ROTFL...that's just...sad. o_O

I design and program better than you can, Tinkerbell.

I haven't "learnt" HTML yet, huh? *rolls eyes* I guess all my sites just came out of the
sky, huh retard? Oh and you must not have looked at the source code (not that you'd be
able to read it), cause if you had, you won't find any "Frontpage" or any such tags like
that. Why not? Cause I use Notepad to design my sites. ^_^

LOL. Do you have a static IP? If so I should permanently ban you from accessing my
sites. That would sure hold a special sort of irony when I do actually release it and you
want to download it...of course you're no video editor, so maybe it wouldn't be such a big
deal. At the very most yer just a DVD rip monkey encoder (cause really it only takes the
intelligence of a monkey to rip a DVD). And website design? *snicker* You obviously
HAVEN'T designed any. And if you ever did, fuck they would be made to conform with
Nutscrape's failing endeavors to lag behind the W3C on yer non standard web res.
ROTFL...like I said earlier, yer just a fuckin amateur Cupcake, whose angry and jealous at
people with REAL skill. Let's see you try and critique my actual rendered Lego models
though next time, Dribbles, that should make you look even sillier. `, )

--

Onideus Mad Hatter
mhm ¹ x ¹
http://www.backwater-productions.net

On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 09:04:04 GMT, Brisk <brisk@NOSPAMsupanet.com> wrote:

What else do you own? You know, besides failing little delusions and a limited lifespan?

Oh gee, now THAT was sure a great comeback. *sigh* Boy there's just no WAY I can compete
with such stunning wit like THAT. You've certainly cut me to the quick this time Brisk.
I mean if it hadn't been for you meddling kids, why I could have gotten away with it too!

Ya know, hypocrisy isn't just a fun word to say slowly and feel your lips
jiggle, you mindless little snit.

--

Onideus Mad Hatter
mhm ¹ x ¹
http://www.backwater-productions.net

On 16 Jul 2003 10:44:48 +0100, Brisk <brisk@NOSPAMsupanet.com> wrote:

And I'm sure if everyone claps their hands hard enough you might even stop being stupid,
Tinkerbell...well maybe not.

--

Onideus Mad Hatter
mhm ¹ x ¹
http://www.backwater-productions.net

BTW, its seems my newsnet server had a few hickups earlier, and if
multiple copies of this reply come through, just ignore em.... unless
you're Hatter, who will no doubt latch onto it like the desperate
specimen he is >:E


Onideus Mad Hatter <mad_hatter@charter.net> wrote in
news:vhbb2961rut32c@corp.supernews.com:


Well here we go again kids!

56k users are only the majority of the internet userbase. Pretty strange
how you would want to alienate so many users, especially when reading
your views on website compatability and screen resolution later on.

Ooooh! Frames! Now theres something we haven't seen before! Let me guess,
next you'll be adding midi files to your pages right? Oops... too late.

I know how much people charge for logos. But who would spend anything
more than chuckle on those particular logo's are beyond me.

Yeah, i'm sure you're rolling in the cash with designs like those
advertised on your website. I'm sure you do make more money than me
considering i'm still at university, and haven't even bothered doing
freelance work as of yet. But I assure you, by the time I graduate, i'll
be earning a tad more than the $100 you're asking for on your webpage ;-)

Hehe. I was waiting for this, and I guess I should have posted some links
prior to your reply, since I know how predictable you are. Anyways, you
can view some of my 'arty' pieces of work at http://brisk.deviantart.com
.. My core design work (letterheads, logo's, business cards, etc..) is all
stored safely on my PC. Though I may upload a few examples if you make me
giggle in your reply.

I'll match those odds!

You're right. I don't tend to design for digital media anymore (most of
the work I do at university requires me to design for print), though I do
have 3 examples of websites I could show you. Theres my first website at
http://www.planetquake3.net/tweak (whats that? proper hosting, and over
111,000 visitors? shssssh) which was my first foray into HTML. Nothing
special by anyones standards, but its obviously done the trick, and
aquired a few more hits than your care bears webby. Then theres
http://www.electroholic.com - a website I am working with a friend on
dedicated to electronic music. Its only a markup page at the momment, but
it'll expand into a full dedicated website shortly. Then theres also my
website at http://www.puzl.net which I have just started work on. Again,
only a markup page to start with, but what remains relatively simple at
the momment will soon expand into my complete online portfolio. So much
for no web experience, eh?

Haven't figured it out? Maybe its because our ideas of what a website
actually should look like differs a tad.

Did you not read the part which said 'good logo'. I don't see any of them
on your website oddly enough. Thats kinda contradictive don't you think?

Well, i'm sure the clients themselves are very nice people. Its just the
first impression I get of them comes from the pen of yourself. And as
we've gathered over this little discussion of ours, I don't really think
much of your work.

Most of the time, he client themself doesn't actually know good design.
Thats the whole point of a graphic design team. They're there to advise
the client on what actually works, and deomonstrate to them the most
effective means of making their company more successful and prolific
through the web medium. If the client has any trust in your whatsoever,
he or she will listen.

Only a retard surf's the interweb with a resolution higher than 800x600?
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Holy shit, just when I thought you couldn't get any more
retarded. So I guess the advantage of allowing multiple browser windows,
room for more data, and a neater, more compact display is a bad thing
yes? Not to mention that in numerous polls on sites I have read over the
last 12 months, over 60 percent of users use a resolution of 1024x768 or
higher? Don't get me wrong, I wouldn't alienate those using a resolution
of 800x600 (hell, all my websites work fine at that particular
resolution), but to assume all higher pixel displays are bad is just
plain ingnorent. A good designer will allow their website to look great
at ALL resolutions.

So there is some commen sense in there somewhere? Sssh, next you'll be
telling me you can wipe your own ass too!

Um, exactly what does screen resolution have to do with the display of
the colours on my monitor dumbass? And whats wrong with red on black?
Lol, go back to design school (or should I say, enrol because its obvious
you're just some monkey in your parents basement without a proper job
hoping to one way or another get enough cash to pay them the last
decade's worth of rent).

I see the words 'Indecipherable typography?' above, and I stand by them!

Tst... you sell a website to a company and don't even design the logo on
time for them? Jesus Christ, you call this a respectable company?!?!

Actually, I forgot all about them, since I was more interested in the
terrible design than the actual content of the website (which will have
been provided to you by the client themself, so I guess even you couldn't
fuck that up).

Sure, I love the little fuckers. My first girlfriend had care bear
knickers! Why wouldn't I love em!

I use many web browsers, including IE. It makes sense if you're designing
websites to make sure they work in all web browsers. I learnt that after
designing my first website (at planetquake3) which is only supported by
IE. Unlike some, I try to make my sites appeal to as large an audience as
possible.

All design and no content? One of the first thing I learned was that
design should suit a purpose, and that purpose shouldn't only be design.
Check my website, i'm sure you'll find as much content as you can on your
loveable care bears webby. I'm sure all 400 of your visitors appreciate
the content as much as I do!

*waits with bainted breath again*

Evidently not.

Aw! That hurts, it really does!

And Mozilla. And IE (Win32 and MacOS). And Opera.

Without seeing my work first! How presumptuous!

You design in Notepad? ROFL! I guess that would explain a few things.
Professionals will of course design using program such as dreamweaver,
and manually EDIT using notepad if needbe. But I guess the words Hatter
and Professional don't really come together do they?

Sadly not, but I fully expect the hacking comments to come next!

Really? You'd do that for me! And heres me thinking we aint getting
along.... truely i'm touched by your generousity!

Nope, you're right. I only encode to MPEG2 in my spare time, and mainly
encode MP3's. Nothing too difficult, but if you wanna pop in
a.b.m.s.mp3.electronic, you'd find i'm quite good at what I do.

Considering the content of this particular group, and what appeals to the
majority of users (high quality DVD rips in MPEG2/4 format), a simple
DVD2SVCD job is all that is required to get things done. Why
overcomplicate things when you don't need to?

Nope, no website design experience have I

And you were complaining about me carrying the same sentences throughout
my reply? Sssh. And making selections in PS and filling them with a
simple gradient doesn't exactly constitute a render sweatheart. The only
3 dimensional rendering you've done is shitting in your parents toilet
every few hours.

Anyways, it was a pleasure replying to you as always.


--
Brisk

On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 22:27:12 GMT, Brisk <brisk@NOSPAMsupanet.com> wrote:

Translation - The poor fool had a short between the keyboard and chair.

Are you too easy you ask? Well, let's just say you're too WEAK to be "easy". `, )

Don't blink, Lackwit:
http://msn-cnet.com.com/2100-1034_3-1018190.html

"The number of U.S. consumers using broadband technology to access the Internet has
reached nearly 40 million--the highest level to date--as people continue to shed slower
dial-up services in droves, according to a study.

The number of broadband, or high-speed, subscribers swelled by 49 percent in May compared
with the same period last year, while the number of narrowband users dropped 12 percent,
according to the lastest returns from Internet measurement firm Nielsen/NetRatings.

Dial-up access still has a commanding presence, accounting for nearly twice as many users
as those of broadband in the United States. The gulf, however, is narrowing: Last year
there were three times as many dial-up users as there were broadband users."

Some of us are just a little ahead of the game...unlike you. *snicker*

Let me guess, it takes you 3 hours to make minute rice, huh? LOL

Your poorly contrived attempt at sarcasm just shows off your poverty of intellect even
further. I mean, where do I tout frames as being the latest, greatest, best thing ever?
Oh, yeah, I didn't. The point of the argument was that you were bitchin cause yer a
pathetic dial-up user whose complaining about the 100k graphic. I merely stated that I
had planned to make it more efficient by using frames. Again though, I'm not sure why I'm
explaining this obviousness. It's pretty apparent that you're just fishing for whatever
failing arguments you can make without any real purpose or direction.

I only put midis on customers websites and ONLY if THEY tell me too. Again, this is why I
make more money than you, because *I* do what the CUSTOMER wants, not what I want. And
you seem a bit silly harpin on the use of midi files when you've got a fuckin "enter" page
for your site (which doesn't even work). Your entire site is an enter page that leads to
a corrupt flash popup. Oh, hey, STELLAR web designing skills there, Fuckup. *rolls eyes*

No, I really don't think you do actually.

So who have you designed logos for? Oh, yeah, no one. Who have *I* designed logos/splash
screens for? *snicker* Check this out:
http://webpages.charter.net/mad_hatter/MHsVer.gif

And you've made logos for...oh, yeah, NO ONE. Wanna know why? Again, it's cause you
don't know how to do what your CUSTOMER wants. `, )

Actually my website is more of just a hobby, I have a real job which takes up most of my
time (I do mostly the same thing for that job though as I do on Backwater Productions).

ROTFL...you had to go to school to learn graphic art? *snicker* Obviously you have no
natural talent (which is pretty apparent after looking at your work). And of course you
have no ability to learn on your own. Hate to tell ya this, but that degree you're
working for, it's going to be as worthless as toilet paper once you get out into the real
world, Cupcake. 20 years ago a college degree really meant something, but at this point,
they're so easy to get (especially with the availability of student loans, grants, etc)
that most employers are more intent on the work you've ACTUALLY done. And I hope that
shit you have up on Deviant isn't all you have to show, because it's pathetic.

You seem to have "haven't bothered" mixed up with "can't".

Oh you poor naive little fool...I feel such incredible pity for you, I really do. Here,
have a free clue, the tech boom, IS DEAD. And all you morons who haven't wizened up and
switched careers...you are so gonna be fucked. If you've got natural talent, you might be
able to get a job, but otherwise, nah.

YOU were? Heh, guess that makes two of us.

How predictable *I* am? Um, if you go around trying to discredit someone else's work
without posting any of your own how ELSE would expect them to respond? o_O

Yer like a retard standing on top of a building telling everyone you can make ambulances
come....yeah, by jumping off and hopefully killing yourself. *rolls eyes*

*shakes head* Oh my...I mean, where do I even BEGIN?! o_O

How about "Rise of the Robots"? *snicker*

Man you KNOW you're seriously fucked in the graphic arts biz when you're working with less
than 128 colors. I mean, there's always simplicity of design, but that not THAT fucking
simple.

Let's see, what next, oh how about "Chaos With Numbers". I guess that day you learned
about "layering", huh? ROTFL...and come on, the design and style is such a fucking rip
off of Minority Report. *rolls eyes*

K, what's next, "Befriend A Fallen Angel". Well, apparently this is another work from
your "simple" phase. At least this one has shading though! If anything you might be able
to get a job making some REALLY mediocre clipart!

The only one I actually like (and not because of it's design or style), is the "Expert
Stress Relief" one. Although, I only like it if you were actually TRYING to be
satarical...if not you're just an idiot.

I wouldn't bother, your work is boring, it just doesn't have any style. I feel really
sorry for you if you're going to be choosing that as your profession. I mean maybe if you
had some skillz with graphic rendering or doing REAL art you might have a chance, but
you're no Anry, Cupcake.

I personally freely admit that my skills in pure artistry are not the best, but they are
certainly greater than yours. Of course as far as graphics rendering/animation I do
consider myself to be quite good and always getting better. And my skill in video editing
and lip synching, OOOooo, now ain't that just sweet.

Here's an old AMV I did, some of my early work:
http://www.backwater-productions.net...potentiary.mpg

I'll probably remaster that one at some point when I get better source footage. Some of
the effects don't line up as well as they could, but like I said, some of my earlier work.

Here's some samples of some newer AMVs I'm working on:
http://www.backwater-productions.net...otage%2001.avi
http://www.backwater-productions.net...otage%2002.mpg

On that second clip you're actually only seeing the bottom right hand corner of the
640x480 picture, although for that segment that's all I have done right now. The second
video is truly a marvel in AMV creation, I'm making the ENTIRE thing frame by frame and so
completely reediting the source footage the creators probably won't even be able to tell
it was theirs. ^_^

After you watch the second clip, take a look at this:
http://www.backwater-productions.net/original.jpg

That single frame is what I used to make that entire 11 second video segment.

111,000 unique hits or 111,000 hits period? I mean that CB site I made has only been up
on Backwater for 2 months, doesn't even show up in search engineers yet and has already
had 471 UNIQUE visitors (I wrote the script for the counter myself, works by tracking IP
addresses). And come on, that's 471 hits for fucking CARE BEARS. o_O

And BTW, if you say it is by unique hits, number one, over what span of time and two, does
it keep track using cookies (which most people have deleted every time they exit the
browser) or is it by IP tracking? Or do you even know?

A lot of my old sites, like Insanity Now (which I believe is still up somewhere) generate
around 100,000 unique hits per year. The number of hits though is usually completely
dependant on the size of the community you're targeting. I mean if you made a fuckin
N*SYC er whatever site it'd probably generate a 100,000 hits a month...even if it was
utter fucking crap.

I could start nitpicking like you did about every last lil thing that could be improved
(like being able to see the white outline of the hot spot on the entry page), but then,
I'm a better man than you. You see I recognize that nearly ANY piece of work can be
improved upon and it doesn't matter HOW good you are.

Heh, well like I said, for a site that's only been up for two months, doesn't show up in
search engines, tracks totally unique hits and targets a community with VERY few known
members, it's doin pretty peachy.

Again, rips off the style used in Minority Report...although at least you aren't using the
fuckin George Jetson of the 21st century style that's so popular these days. Boy I tell
ya, if I start in with the transparencies and the overlays...yeah, it'll be time to stick
me in the home cause I'll have gone senile.

You have none from what I've seen. Both those last two pages are just images really,
nothing more. And on that other site it's terribly simple, you don't employ anything
interesting. I'm assuming that the jscript you used isn't your own (what with the varying
programming styles used). Part of it even looks like something I coded, what with the way
the brackets are aligned, heh, I thought I was one of the only people who coded them that
way. ^_^

Yeah apparently in your messed up lil world a website is just a single graphic and no
content at all...*snicker*...yeah, I'd say we've got some conflicting views.

I find it funny how you claim to be an artist but then try to go around saying what's
"good" and "bad" when a true artist would realize that art is quite subjective. I mean,
look at you, you're in fucking love with that style they used in Minority Report and I
think that style is just "blah". What's "good" is mostly a matter of perspective. Again,
like on my client sites, you think *I* wanted to make those sites that way? Hell fucking
no, it's what THEY wanted, it's what THEY considered to be "good art". *shrugs*

Well after seeing all that you've managed to accomplish, I can't say that really means
much.

Gee, ya think?

*sigh*...you poor naive little fool, you just don't get how the real world works. If you
want I'll gladly post some of the e-mails exchanged about the sites about "what's best"
and exactly WHY it's the best. But you see the thing is, the customer is paying for it
and they want it the way THEY want it. And again, art is subjective. I mean at one time
putting midis on your website was all the rage. So how come it's considered to be so lame
now? *shrugs* No reason really, it's just a fad. I mean, seriously, can YOU actually
tell me what's wrong with putting midi's on a website? I mean if you're like me you'll
probably say it's tacky, but again, that's a completely subjective view.

It's Internet, and yes.

Not at all. I'm speaking ONLY for web browsing. I suppose if you were intelligent you
could try and argue the use of div sheets and layers, however the vast majority of web
programmers out there either don't know how to do that or generally just don't want to
because it makes for bad cross browser compatibility. All this is moot point though,
you're no web designer so I don't expect you to understand the importance of standards.

"90% of all statistics are made up on the spot"

And uh, I know yer pulling shit out of your ass, cause uh, well walk yer dumbass down to
Staples or any other computer/office store and on ALL their test models, tell me how many
are set to a res higher than 800x600....like, just about NONE. o_O

If you've got like a 21 inch monitor I can understand a res higher than 800x600, although
I would still lock the browser window at 800x600. Although if my sites are looking blurry
on a res higher than 800x600, well, you obviously don't have a 19"+ monitor. LOL yer
probably using some crappy piece of shit 15" monitor. Heh...

It's not a question of good or bad son, it's a question of compatibility and
standardization.

Now why would I need to wipe my ass when I've got a pathetic little ass slurper like you
to do it for me? `, )

I like how he completely avoids my question and just counters with some dribbling little
third grade insult. "go back to design school" Oh, hey, that's FUNNY. No REALLY.
*rolls eyes*

Here's a bit of Color Theory 101 for ya Jackass:

http://www.colormatters.com/colortheory.html

"Red appears more brilliant against a black background and somewhat duller against the
white background. In contrast with orange, the red appears lifeless; in contrast with
blue-green, it exhibits brilliance. Notice that the red square appears larger on black
than on other background colors."

Of course your problem probably has more to do with the contrast settings on your monitor
than it does with my color scheme. And last I checked red on black wasn't in the top ten
"no-no" color schemes like yellow on white or cyan on white.

Best check yerself there, Edith, probably you've got the contrast on yer monitor turned up
too high.

Um, the CB website is a personal website I did to gain power and control over that
community. I didn't get PAID anything to make it, unless you count the money I get from
selling episodes.

LOL...oh the irony. He says he's more interested in design than the content of the
website...and yet, the content fucking *IS* design. *rolls eyes*

What, do you think I made Lego models and took pictures with a fuckin camera, you moron?

I'm happy for you, really.

That can actually be impossible to do depending on what you're trying to accomplish. I
mean, if one browser fails to meet up with the standards set by the W3C, then any new
functionality is simply going to be lost on that browser unless you don't use it or can
find some alternative way of doing it, perhaps with a some third party web programming
language, although even with that there are problems with compatibility. In fact that was
the MAJOR downfall of the Insanity Now site, it employed so many different effects that
the list of pluggins needed just to view the fucking entry page was beyond insane.
Currently though I'm working on redoing the entire site in Flash. I also plan to make the
labyrinth more interactive than it currently is.

But you can't really do that unless you're employing the latest and greatest in web
techniques, and again, if a browser doesn't support those techniques, doesn't conform to
the standards set by the fuckin World Wide Web Consortium, well, I say fuck em. I mean if
you wanna use an old 386 with Windows 3.11 and some long lost forgotten version of IE, hey
more power to ya, but I'm not going to design my fucking websites around your archaic
stupidity.

No, the first thing you learned was how to steal other peoples style and try and pass it
off as your own. See that's the thing, Cupcake, you've got no style, no sense of "you" in
your work. It's all just superficial, redundant, and generally a bore. Your art has no
life to it. Take the images I made for the CB fanfic I'm writing:
http://www.backwater-productions.net...haracters.html

Certainly it's nothing incredible artistic wise, but the point is that the art has LIFE in
it. Where as when you look at any of your pieces it's just like...aparthy. o_O

Um...two of your sites don't have ANY content...what the hell are you talking about?

Mmmm, I'm sure. I think I might have said this before, but if sarcasm was a lil girl, YOU
WOULD BE IN THE PARK RAPING HER RIGHT NOW!

o_O

Seriously, try something new, cause sarcasm is NOT your forte.

Nope. And the worst part for someone like you...is that you're not really ever going to
get better at what you do. Where as I on the other hand get better and more efficient
with every new piece I do. You see for someone like me, I practically get off on tryin to
push myself to new limits, it's what I live for. `, )

Remember what I said about the sarcasm?

Why are you using so many different browsers? I mean I suppose if you wanted to check how
your websites looked under each one, but surely you don't mean to say you randomly surf
the Inet with this that or the other? o_O

Dare I even ask how much software you've installed on your system? *shudder* I don't
even venture a guess as to what the file structure on your system looks like. If your
websites are any indication, it's probably not good.

Not at all. I don't think you realize just how much of yourself personality wise you give
away in your typing style. I mean, come on, you're just a very boring person on the
whole, why wouldn't I have expected your "art" to reflect that?

*snicker*

This doofball thinks designing websites in notepad is a BAD thing...LOL, what a fuckin
amateur. I'm bettin he uses like MS Frontpage to make all his uber sites! `, D

Um, first of all most "professionals" in the IT industry are IDIOTS. I mean, let's not
fucking kid ourselves here, like 90% of IT graduates couldn't tell you the difference
between the CMOS and BIOS. You take your average programming major and ask him how many
languages he can program and he actually LISTS THEM! I mean...holy fuckin Christmas, if
you're a PROGRAMMER, you should be able to program in ANY computer language. I mean, it's
all based on logic, only the syntax really varies from one language to another and hey,
that's why God invented desk references!

Second of all, WHY would I need to use Dreamweaver? No, really, like what is it that you
think it can do that Notepad can't? o_O

Boy I can't *WAIT* to hear his explanation of THIS one.

Yeah I'm more along the lines of an EXPERT...at least in comparison to the "professionals"
you're referring to. *rolls eyes*

I really liked it when I worked at Coffey Communications for a bit. I all sat down with
the HR peeps and I all point over to their "New Media" department with over TWELVE
"professional college IT graduates" and I'm all like, "See them? I can replace
them....ALL of them". Of course they didn't believe me, so I offered to work for free for
a week, did so, and produced twice as much content as TWELVE of them could in the span of
one week and DAMN did it look 10 times better than the utter crap they were spewing out.
Afterwards they offered me a job, I turned them down, but offered to do contract work for
them.

Huh? I'm not really much of a network hacker, my forte in hacking is more along the lines
of SE. Although I have been known to dabble a bit in hardware hacking. Like when I
figured out how you could take apart an old Dazzle capture card and get it to capture
video at a higher res than 352x240. ^_^

Refer to what I said earlier about sarcasm.

When you say you encode MP3s you mean you just rip them off CDs, you don't mean like
making mixes, do you?

*snicker*

What DO you do? I mean, seriously, you've produced a few pieces of mediocre lookin art,
most of which looks like over glorified clip art, you've made ONE piddling little site
that aside from ass raping text color roll overs doesn't do ANYTHING really interesting
design wise. And then you've got two "work in progress" sites that are basically just a
fucking graphic. I mean...ooo...

<IMG SRC="image.gif">

REALLY cutting edge stuff there, huh? *rolls eyes*

I mean at least I have an excuse for most of my art not being absolutely incredible, it's
cause I spread myself WAY too thin across too many communities. I mean, seriously, like
name a community that I HAVEN'T had some impact on, either positive or negative.

I'm sure there are quite a few peeps in here who are actually pretty hard core fans of the
show, probably have websites and such devoted to it. Obviously you're not one of them...I
guess studying bad art and failing color theory 101 takes up most of your time, huh?
*snicker*

You musta just been...fucking BLIND when you went to the Backwater page, I mean, there's a
giant freakin rendered scene RIGHT there, can't exactly miss it. o_O

Oh and then all my models:
Here's a direct link to one of em, Kitten, you can't miss it:
http://www.backwater-productions.net.../dk_angle.html

Yeah well next time try and make yourself more interesting, I only like it when you
STRUGGLE. I mean, if you were actually GOOD at graphic art, well I mean that would
certainly be something....but nah, it was nothing.

*10 to 1 says no one gets that reference either* ^_^

Oh hey, look at that, how creative of you, you lame little fuck. *rolls eyes*

--

Onideus Mad Hatter
mhm ¹ x ¹
http://www.backwater-productions.net

Onideus Mad Hatter <mad_hatter@charter.net> wrote in
news:vhcooi7o8rag4a@corp.supernews.com:

A+++ for the effort involved in that particular comeback Hatter!

Uh-oh, looks like our friend Hatter has lost it...

Despite what you may believe, the world does not start and end with the
USA. As a resident of the United Kingdom, I assure you those broadband
figures do not match ours. I'm sure its the same for the majority of the
rest of the world too.

OMGLMAOROFL! Another comeback which destroyed me in 1 fell swoop! Damn, I
don't know why I bother replying if I get so instantly owned with
comments such as that! (cue sarcasm related reply).


More fantasy flames. Do you think I would upload more than 21gb of data
to this newsgroup if I was on 56k? Get a clue. And 99% of the time, n00bs
such as yourself will use frames and completely fuck up the navigation of
the website. Though considering how poor it was to start with, you can't
exactly get much worse eh Hatter?

The enter page is there merely for cosmetic purposes. As I say, it was my
first website, and I wouldn't include it in subsequent designs. And the
enter page doesn't work? How about you try move your mouse over the
designated MAP, and click? But then, you'd need half a braincell to do
something so complicated. And actually, my host edited the main page to
include the popup's, so don't blame me. Hell, I haven't had FTP access to
that website for over a year now, so no doubt they could exploit it any
way they feel.

Heres where I say "oh yes I do!". And you say "oh no you don't!" in the
subsequent reply. Shit, you should get into pantamime you fairy.

http://www.bdiclan.co.uk/forums/index.php - all web graphics were
designed by me, including the d5 logo (not the bdi logo, that was
designed by someone else). The electroholic logo was designed by me. The
puzl.net logo was designed by me. Lets not forget the tweak arena logo
too. I also have designs I made for ficticious companies during my course
this year. I also recently designed the CD inlay's for a friend who is
submiting his demo CD to various record labels in the UK. You can ask to
see them if you want, and maybe if your reply has an ounce of
originality, I might oblige.

No, its because i'm still in university perfecting my design skills. I
figure i'd rather be 100% comfortable that I have the design insight to
please the customer before making any worthless piece of trash like you
do.

Sweet jesus! With an online portfolio of TWO clients, how could cackwater
productions NOT be your main source of income?!

Actually, i'm entirely self-trained, and knew photoshop before I even
went to university. So bang goes your natural talent theory. I'd prefer
to have the relevent qualifications so that I can find a job that appeals
to me, and not just start some crappy 'hobby' website like cackwater. But
don't worry, my portfolio would compliment the actual written degree
nicely.

Well, you've prooved with your website that anyone can setup freelance
design - even someone as talentless as yourself.

Tech boom? Who mentioned anything about designing for web? As I mentioned
earlier, I design primarily for the print media. And last time I checked,
it isn't going anywhere soon... pay more attention in future Hatter.

As far as i'm aware, you've been trying to discredit my work long before
you ever had the chance to see it. So practice what you preach, fool.

Its a T-Shirt design! ROFL! I'd like to see you submit designs to a
respectable printer with more than 10 colours in the design!
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA! God you truely are the epitome of cluelessness.


Minority report? Not that i've even seen the film, but i'll take your
word that I copied something from a film I have yet to even witness. I'll
check it out now that you mention it though. As far as I remember, it was
a successful film, so if my work can be compared to that of a motion
picture blockbuster, i'll take it as a compliment!

Another T-Shirt design. Come on, learn to read Hatter!

Think of it as a lesson in typography, and one you'd never be able to
understand. By the way, aren't you forgetting all about the techno hand,
and postcard from utopia imagery? Tst... seems you can't comment on them
since you know as well as I do that they're a million miles away from
anything you could possibly hope to achieve.

No style? Considering the fact that I have been given distinctions in all
my designs from my tutor concerning the images you have just seen, it
seems you share that opinion with only yourself. But again, I wouldn't
expect someone as talentless as you to understand good gfx design. And
remember, my field is graphic design - not art. There is a difference.

Oh do I have to check them out? Oh well, for arguments sake, I guess I
will (hoping you haven't blocked my IP from your website that is!).

Oh dear..... anime music videos. I'm sorry, but considering I hate rock
music, and I see nothing more than simple Premiere editing, i'll skip the
next few. No offense, I see nothing particularly wrong with the editing,
but it holds no interest for me to see more than one of them.

111,000 hits period. I see no need to lie, but considering the subject
medium in question (helping gain better FPS for Q3A), its not exactly the
most mainstream of websites is it? I'm just happy I was able to help, and
if you checkout my guestbook, it seems a lot of people were happy with
what I provided.

Sure, it was my first website, designed more than 3 years ago. As you
say, anything can be improved, and mine is by no means perfect.

Glad to hear it.

Considering the target medium for the website (futuristic electronic
music), I think the design matches it perfectly. I'd still improve a few
things given the chance (I feel the colours could be more saturated, and
the typography/font improved slightly), but it suits its purpose
regardless.

Well check the source code a little more thoroughly in future. You'll
find that the code for puzl.net especially is far from simple. Though
maybe it is to some people, but web languages aren't me speciality, since
i'm a graphic designer, not a web programmer. Thats why my friend is
doing the programming for electroholic. It shares the load.

lol... thats terrible. Considering I did mention they were only markup
pages, and I provided you with my Tweak Arena website as proof for
effective content, I can't help but get the impression you're becoming
increasingly desperate to find ways to hit back at me.

I never once claimed to be an artist. Graphic design is different. I can
appreciate both art and design in its many form, but the fact still
remains that your work on your websites are poor. Be it through the fault
of the client or not.

You've only seen a sample of my work. I've been designing for years, and
have tonnes of personal work that remains in my portfolio. As I said, the
community at deviantart prefer more 'arty' work, which isn't actually
what my course is all about. I figure its more interesting for them to
show pictures of hands gaped in electricity than viewing letterhead and
logo designs. Its all about target audience, which is another thing you
would have learnt had you any academic experience in the field.

Well considering I wrote 5 lines expressing my opinion of the matter...
yes.

Midi's represent in their entirety a website designed by a n00b. They
provide no relevent purpose to the website other than to annoy. If you're
listening to music as you view the website, it'll clash. In short -
they're pointless and irratating.

Actually, its the WWW. And I guess me and the billions of other people
who browse websites using a resolution higher than 800x600 are retards.
Were one happy community it seems.

See this is what I love about you. You go on about standards such as
those set my w3, yet you blatently ignore them by designing websites
which will only work properly in IE. Incredible.

I have a CTX 19" monitor actually. My base resolution is 1280x1024 @
85hz, and my max resolution is 1600x1200 @ 75hz. I'm a designer remember?
A big monitor with decent resolution range is essential.

Check my reply a few sentences up the screen.

This is by far the most intelligent reply I have seen from you yet. You
must be proud.

With compression on the images (especially using the JPEG standard), red
on black is sufficiently damaged. Check the preview image for my fallen
angel picture at deviantart for an example of what I mean. Despite what
you think, red on black DOES clash, and just because it may appear more
brilliant (as in it stands out better than it would on a white
background), it doesn't mean it makes for pleasent viewing.

Nope, I use the Adobe Gamma tool to correctly set my monitor brightness
and contrast.

Power and control over the Care Bears community eh? Considering the
majority of the fans are probably less than 10 years old, it does suggest
certain thing about your character. And considering the paedophile claims
I read in google about you, I suppose everything is becoming clear.


Probably. But then, considering the quality of the final 'renders', I'm
guessing it was more like a webcam.

She certainly was!

So long as they appear virtually indentical throughout the popular
browser spectrum (and there are no anomalities that prevent certain areas
from being viewable), then the job has been done. End of story as far as
i'm concerned.

Read up. So long as the website works in the latest versions of all the
popular browsers, then everything should be fine. But you're the one so
obsessed by standards remember, not me.

Steal other peoples style? Ah, you're refering to the film I haven't seen
again. And i'm not the one who simply scanned in images of the care bears
and passed it off as my own work. I won't lie, i've used other peoples
images in my designs before, but only to compliment it - not to use it as
the foundation for everything else I do. All my work is original. Copying
other people has no appeal to me, since i'd only be cheating myself.

I said WEBSITE. None plural, Einstein. If you're trying to convince the
rest of the people in this newsgroup that my tweak arena website has no
content, then you're a bigger fool than I thought you were.

Who was being sarcastic? I honestly CANT WAIT to see your lossless codec!
Seriously, i'm consuming air like fat people consume food just thinking
about it!

*glee*

Not getting better? If I was to compare my early work to the designs I am
making now, I quietly smile to myself. Regardless though, even my early
work circa-1998 is better than anything you're currently doing.

Nope, you'll have to remind me again! And again! And Again! *repeat till
fade*

I use various machines, not just the one at my house. My base unit at
home has mozilla and IE installed (mozilla was used because I moderate a
very busy forum called quake3world, and recent security holes in IE meant
it was possible for people to obtain cookies containing passwords and
suchlike - it was an exploit the admin found out about actually). The
machines at Uni use IE (mac) and Opera. I have had Win2k installed on my
machine over a year now, and its still as fast as when I first installed
it. Trust me, you have no need to worry about my file structure, or
system integrity.

I guess I only appear boring by talking to company such as yourself.
You're not exactly demanding much out of me, so I applogise if my words
appear samey. Your fault afterall.

Designing websites exclusively in Notepad is a bad idea. It takes more
time, and creating vast, complicated websites becomes tedious and
tiresome. And no, I don't use Frontpage, but thanks for your concern.

As a web programmer, you can write in PHP/Perl/CGI/ASP then yes?

Notepad can do everything Dreamweaver can. No denying that. It just means
everything has to be done manually, and a page that would take 10 minutes
in Dreamweaver could take well over an hour in Notepad. Error checking is
also much more tedious.

You go girl!

You turned down a job designing to become a part time janitor? Damn, I
guess only you could do something like that Hatter.

I care.


And you refer to what I said earlier about sarcasm.

CD's, Vinyl, MD, Tape, DAT... you name it, I can rip it. My vinyl rips in
particular have had much praise, even from members of release groups who
put them out regularly. I guess knowing how to edit in Soundforge, and
taking the time to learn more about the LAME codec helps.

You had an impact on communities? Last I heard, you were just another
boring, generic troll getting owned newsgroup to newsgroup, then trying
to find somewhere else to preach at. Fact is, you have no real respect,
and instead wander from place to place hoping to one day get a grasp of
how meaningless your existance actually is. I don't even need to reply to
the top sentence since i've pretty much made my case clear throughout the
rest of my reply.

I'm a big fan of SG-1. I've seen all the episodes, and being involved in
various communities over the time i've watched it. I've also given back
to this community by providing them with decent quality DVD rips of the
first season. Something I was under no obligation to do. Unlike you, I
actually HELP people instead of trying to undermine them.

Refer to my previous comments about the quality of your 'renders' son.

Its pretty hard to struggle when you're this easy to destroy. Regardless,
I won't be replying to your next post (which will if previous experience
has told us, be similarly inept and predictable), since i'm getting bored
now, and you don't offer the challenge anymore. Ta-ta!


A pleasure as always, Matt!

--
Brisk

On Thu, 17 Jul 2003 13:02:54 GMT, Brisk <brisk@NOSPAMsupanet.com> wrote:

WOW! Gotta love Brisk, I haven't found anyone that could keep up with me in a LONG time!
I just hope we can get this thread kicked up over 900 lines in the next few, now THAT
would be great!

D- for the effort involved in critiquing it, Assface.

You can't be lost if you're not trying to get anywhere.

Actually for the most part it really does. I mean, the ENTIRE economy of the whole
fucking PLANET is pretty much dependant on us. Granted that could be changed, but it
won't be any time soon. And because of the "great melting pot" America is about as close
as you can get to global unification. I mean I have relatives and friends whose ancestry
(usually not even more than a generation or two) spans all across the globe. When America
speaks, THE WORLD speaks. You may not like that fact, but that doesn't make it any less
true.

*shrugs* I don't care, move.

I mean if there's something you WANT that you can't have where you're at...fucking move.
o_O

I honestly don't see how people can be so utterly fucking clueless. I mean I own a house
in Washington JUST so I can go up there to light off fireworks every 4th (cause they don't
allow any good fireworks in Oregon due to fire danger). And why Grants Pass, Oregon?
Mostly convenience of location, right smack in the middle between LA and Seattle. And
then there's the fact that I have cable Inet service for only $30 a month, only $10 more
than what I'd pay for dialup and like 1,000 times faster. Selection of stores, what shows
are broadcasted on the local cable translators, housing costs, electricity costs, etc,
etc, etc...these are all basic things that you should consider when choosing a place to
live...although most people are so fuckin retarded they DON'T CHOOSE where they live, they
just sorta drift in somewhere and then bitch about everything that doesn't suit them.

Now let's see....which one is my left hand...could it be...this one-

^_^

Personally I don't know, nor do I particularly care WHAT you upload.

Tu quo, Lil One.

o_O

Woah...that was weird. He's all on the subject of connection speed and Usenet uploading
and then suddenly he just flips to talking about frames and web design. Ya got more spin
than fuckin Faux News there, Bud.

This coming from the guy whose web pages start and end with one:
<IMG SRC="">

Doesn't change the fact that it meets most peoples lists of "do not's" as far as web
design. Right up there with midis and turquoise on white color schemes. *shrugs*

Yeah well I wouldn't quit yer day job there, Cupcake.

Reading comprehension really isn't something you have much of, is it? I never said it
didn't work your moron, I said when you click it you can see the image map outline.
YEESH, yer such a fuckin amateur you don't even know how to match the hot spot color to
the background color! o_O

This all goes back to my FUCKING MOVE theory. I mean, there ARE other hosts you know.
And no offense, but your current host is a fucking joke.

Well it's nice to know you don't care about your work...it really shows too btw. ^_^

Fairy? Oh so we're coming up with creative fag lames now, huh? Oh here, it's my
turn...hrmmm...let me think...

You're about as flaming as a gay rights parade, being led by Elton John, while passing
underneath a rainbow in San Francisco.

ROTFL...uh, you didn't design ANY of those icon cupcake, they're the standard ones that
are included in that prepackaged fuck job of a PHP BB. And I'm not seein too many
graphics on that site...there's the nav buttons, but come on, those are just lame, you
don't even do any roll over effects. *rolls eyes*

INCREDIBLE use of a linear gradient transparent overlay though, OH WOW, that is just SO
AMAZING.

The only logo I see on that page is the bdi logo...did you forget a link?

Yeah, I can tell, what with your "apathy" style of artistry. As I said, you don't care
about your work...and it REALLY shows.

Oh and I image they're just STELLAR! LOL

Is your friends music work as bland and tasteless as your art? Cause hey, if so, it
should be a perfect match!

Coming from you "apathy art" boi, that really doesn't mean much. Even if my graphic art
isn't "the best", it still has life to it...yours does not.

You know Stupid, if you had actually taken the bother to check, Backwater Productions
hasn't even been AROUND for more than 2 months. o_O

And quit ripping off CNN, bad puns are THEIR department.

ROTFL...*shakes head*...

Oh good God. Do you mean to tell me that you have people taking classes with you who
HADN'T ever used a basic graphic editing proggie beforehand? o_O

Well dream as you like, Cupcake. *shrugs* Sure I'm evil, but hey, who am I to try and
shatter the witless dreams and senseless ambitions of a lesser?

I have more talent in my left pinky finger than you'll EVER have in your entire worthless
little life. But don't worry, once you get out of college, FAIL MISERABLY at your
*snicker* "career" and yer scrubbing toilets down at the local pub er whatever, I'm sure
you'll have a nice quiet moment of reflection before you kill yourself as a gift to
humanity. ^_^

Wait, wait, wait...you're doing print media? Uh, wouldn't it make more sense to try and
tout yer skills with InDesign rather than Photoshop? *snicker* Do you even KNOW anything
about the field of work you're getting into? *rolls eyes*

As I've mentioned before, your character and personality often times reflect your
work...and to be perfectly blunt, you're just, well, bland.

Apparently they're like trapped in 1963 over there in the UK...I mean, here in the states,
you can have whatever the fuck you WANT put on a t-shirt, doesn't really matter how many
colors. Heck the local rip off vendors at state fairs can take photographs and stick em
on t-shirts for like $5 bucks in 20 minutes. o_O

It's not that it's comparable, it's just a rip off of the style they used. And you don't
need to actually watch the movie to recognize the style. The translucent blue theme and
the overlays, yeah, it's pretty fucking obvious. And uh, no one ever said you did a GOOD
job of ripping off the style.

So what's wrong with the UK? I mean, is there some law that says you can only have shirts
with under 16 colors? o_O

Uh, how so? *rolls eyes*

Yes but I rarely ever actually take the time to ATTEMPT to understand the ramblings of a
retard.

ROTFL...you stupid pathetic fool, ANYONE can use Bryce. Heck, here's one I just made that
outclasses yours: http://www.backwater-productions.net...inds%20Eye.jpg

LOL, only took me 5 minutes to make too. ^_^

You pathetic clueless loser. Have you noticed on Deviant that NO ONE has any of your work
listed as their favorites? *snicker*

Well what about all the people on Deviant? You know, the ones who AREN'T including you as
their favorite artist. Can you guess why? *shakes head* This renob actually thinks the
verbal slurps he gets from his fuckin teacher are worthy compliments. *sigh* So fucking
sad.

o_O

This guy doesn't think graphic design is art!? Uh...what the fuck do you think it is you
talentless fuck?

Only the first uses rock music, the two other samples use uh...hrmmm...well the one is
like country/light rock-erm...well it's hard to describe. And the second sample uses
uh...*scratches head*...not sure what classification that would go under...emotional
maybe?

Only that first video used simple editing techniques. Had you bothered to fucking READ
what I wrote you would have plainly saw that I said the first link was some of my earlier
work (thus very simple) and the second clips were new stuff I was working on, and thus
used more advanced techniques. Like I also said, that second sample, all 11 seconds of
footage was created using a SINGLE frame. And none of it was created using Premiere
(mainly because Premiere isn't even capable of editing in that fashion).

111,000 straight hits is absolutely fucking pathetic. The Backwater Productions site,
which again has only been up for like 2 months and doesn't even show up in search engines
unless you know the name of the site, has gotten 25,381 hits...in just TWO months. o_O

And it's not like there's even any content on there yet really, most of the site is still
under construction. Although granted a large number of the hits have started coming in
the past two weeks since I created that "cheat" tool for Neopets users.

So then why don't you take the time to improve it? Don't you care about your work?

It'll probably do even better when I put actually episodes up for download, although I
gotta see how much bandwidth that's gonna eat up cause I'm also going to be putting up a
bunch of my AMVs and those things always get downloaded like no tomorrow. Just from
posting links in this past message the clips were downloaded over a dozen times. o_O

Kinda funny cause I didn't think anyone was actually even bothering to read this monster
of a thread...*shrugs*

So you just make stuff and then forget about it? Why don't you improve it? I mean, if
nothing else at least it'd be a good exercise of your "skill"...and boy I think you could
use it.

I was referring to the site that was actually a site, not just a graphic. And uh, you
couldn't have had TOO much code on puzl.net...considering it was just a graphic with a
broken flash popup.

It's pathetic that you can't do both. *I* can do quite literately anything, from
networking, to graphic design, to repair, to programming, to electrical engineering, copy
editing, you name it (although quite frankly I HATE using AP style).

I mean you focus COMPLETELY on graphic design where as I focus on everything under the sun
and I'm STILL better than you!

Oh hey, let's have that link again:
http://www.backwater-productions.net...inds%20Eye.jpg

*snicker* Did it in 5 minutes and it beats the fuckin shit out of anything you've got up
on Deviant.

Spit in one hand, dream in the other, tell me whatcha got more of. I mean, you're the guy
going around touting THIS:
http://www.deviantart.com/view/2382827
As your piesta de resistance....*shakes head*...

*rolls eyes*

Why God? FUCKING WHY?!

Apparently when God was passing out common sense you thought he said incense and said, "No
way man, that stuff makes me sneeze."

Actually the work on my sites is quite good and FAR better than anything YOUR capable of.
Oh but hey, prove me wrong, let's see you make an animated logo. Make one like the Iron
Art Shop logo I did....he, he, he...oh, oh that's right, YOU CAN'T. Why? Because you
suck. And if you think a couple more years of school is gonna make you suck any
less...yer seriously trippin fool.

And the sample of I've seen, strangely enough, is what YOU consider to be your *snicker*
"best". ^_^

YEARS, huh? LOL, yer what, 20? LOL

No, Cupcake, the community at Deviant doesn't prefer ANY of your work, didn't the
"Favorites: 0" on every one of your entries start ringin any bells?

I just love how you keep making excuses for all the reasons you SUCK. I mean with my
work, on the client sites, I may not particularly LIKE the stuff, but at least it LOOKS
GOOD. Unlike your crap.

Not at all, it's just you don't know how to use them. I mean I used that cybercat midi on
one section of the Insanity Now site and it fit in PERFECT with the theme. Midis can
actually add a very nice accent to a website...but they're a lot like frames, if done
correctly, they can be REALLY nice, but if they're done wrong (and most often are) then
they just turn out horrible. Another really great example of proper midi use was that one
FF3 midi I used on the Insanity Now labyrinth page. Generally as a rule, if you're making
a "professional" website or a site for selling stuff, you don't really want to use midis,
but if it's a personal interest website of a multimedia site then they're perfectly
acceptable...so long as you use them right.

First you say it the atmosky...then I say it's the sky...then you say it's the
atmosphere...*rolls eyes*

Billions, huh? LOL, well at least your delusions don't seem to have a floor. ^_^

Actually they're designed to work best in browsers that most accurately conform to the W3C
standards, it's just I've only tested them on IE and I'm not about to have my system
molested with more software just so I can make sure it'll work under some hole in the wall
browser like Opera. I design my sites for IE because it's what MOST of the people surfing
the Inet are using. And if you think otherwise I'll gladly share some of the server logs
to my sites with you, on average 90%+ of all visitors are using IE.

*snicker*

Well I have a BoxLight CD-750m....the entire fucking WALL is my screen. `, )

Ahhh...gotta love projectors. ^_^

Whatever kind of lame you were going for, you missed.

Um...remember, I know more about graphic art than you do. Check close on that Lego
site...oh yeah, all the images are gifs for JUST that reason. *rolls eyes*

No, it really doesn't. And it a combination that's used quite frequently in design.
Jurassic Park, The Blair Witch Project, In Dreams, and MANY other movies all used black
with red for the central color theme of their box art. And if you weren't so uber fuckin
clueless you would also note the REASON I used red, which is that it's part of the color
scheme used for the official Lego logo. They use red with white though, but, as mentioned
on that site, red on black appears more brilliant, which is why I chose to deviant just
slightly from the original Lego theme. Plus I'm also considered to be "mean" "bad" by
most members in the Lego community, so the black also reflects that aspect.

Ya see Cupcake, that's the difference between your "graphic design" and my art. *snicker*
When you make something, you don't put anything of yourself into it, it's just a bland
apathetic white wash with no feeling, emotion, or life to it.

Well it's pleasant enough to be used as one of the most popular color schemes...Dark City,
The Long Kiss Goodnight, The Fugitive, Fallen, Army of Darkness, etc, etc, etc...all used
black on red for their box art.

Uh huh, well if that's the case maybe you should see an eye doctor.

Oh not just their community, they're just a starting point for the whole 80s cartoon
community. See it's best to take over a community one section at a time and then slowly
work up. Trying to take over the ENTIRE 80s cartoon community all at one time would be
very foolish.

Okay now that was just stupid. I mean, if they were less than 10 years old, they wouldn't
have even been ALIVE when the Care Bears were being marketed. Most fans of the show are
20 somethings. Although now with the remarketing of the genre it's starting to pick up
newer fans. Nelvana is doing a new direct to video release movie (in CGI). And the
American Greetings Corp is also remarketing the toys and so forth...and of course I'm
certainly cashing in on it too. He, he, he...I'm actually in negotiations with Hot Topic
to start selling their CB related products through my site.

And what would that be?

People try and claim most anything about me when I've verbally beaten them into the
ground. It would be impossible for me to be a pedophile though, you see, I'm evil. I'm
guessing you don't really have a firm grasp of what that actually means, so I'll explain
it. You see, evil begets evil. TRUE EVIL only takes pleasure in attacking and destroying
that which is also evil. And in general, we are attracted to our polar opposites. My
polar opposite is pure innocence. I like innocence, I enjoy being around it, etc, etc.
But you see, pedophiles, they destroy innocence. So I have somewhat of a personal grudge
against them. If you attack that which I love, I will attack you...and I will do so
relentlessly until I've destroyed everything you are as a person. That's why I destroyed
the adult baby community you know. I thought they had achieved some grand understanding
of innocence and so forth...but I was wrong, so I obliterated their entire community.
*shrugs*

And by "attracted" to innocence I don't mean I love kids, I mean I love people who have an
air of innocence about their character, people like Wing-Storm:
http://members.ebay.com/aboutme/wing-storm/

She embodies innocence in a most wonderful way. ^_^

Wow, you can diss James Jessiman even better than *I* can! ^_^

Of course we know what those Lego freaks would say, "If you don't like it, make your own
Lego rendering program". *snicker*

You should research something called "cost effectiveness". I mean, sure, you can go
through and take a bunch of time and effort to ensure your site is viewable under say
Opera...but then like only 2% of the web populous is even using that browser...so why
waste all that money developing your site for that inconsequential 2%?

Yes, and IE *IS* the standard, seeing as how it's being used by 90%+ of the web populous.

Again, you don't have to see the movie to know the style...I mean it's right there on the
fucking cover art. *rolls eyes*

Um, where did I do that? I have a section on the CB site for "scans and captures", but I
certainly don't tout that stuff as "mine".

Uh huh.

Which explains why you're going around claiming to have made the icons on the PHP BB you
posted earlier, huh? *shakes head*

Wonder Boi here is just SERIOUSLY lackin the reading comprehension department. I mean, he
says WEBSITE, doesn't actually say WHICH site, so then I of course state that two of them
don't even have ANY content and then proceed to ask him to explain himself. And even
further (and I guess I probably should have added this to the last post), but the Tweak
Arena website doesn't really have much for content either. I mean the CB website is over
75 fucking megabytes...now THAT is content. Is your piddling lil Tweak Arena 75mb? No,
no I didn't think so, Sunshine.

Uh huh. What have you learned? Oh, that's right NOTHING.

And I'm not going to be releasing the codec for quite some time, presently it can only
achieve 20% better lossless compression than Huffyuv and there is a LOT of room for
improvement (only it takes fucking forever and then some to develop because every fusion
combination has to be checked to make sure that it can unfuse correctly (and if it doesn't
it takes even MORE work to develop algorithms to handle the deviations). Back when I was
working on the first, second, and third fusion tier it wasn't so bad because it was only
dealing with millions of combinations, but now I'm working in the billions and my computer
isn't exactly stellar when it comes to speed.

Yours:
http://www.deviantart.com/view/2382827

Mine:
http://www.backwater-productions.net...inds%20Eye.jpg

LOL, my 5 minutes worth of NONeffort is better than your current "very best". `, D

It's because the retarded enjoy simple repetition. Clap your hands and drool a bit the
next time, you'll be even funnier, Wonder Boi!

So why didn't you just fix it so it wouldn't be a problem on IE? Oh, oh that's right, you
don't code, I forgot. *rolls eyes*

It's not just about speed, it's also about access. I actually had to program my own file
manager because the base one with Windows was too inefficient. Mainly because my "data
archive" which has around 97,000 pieces of media in it (not including video) and I needed
a file manager tool that could also act as a database. Cause you take something like
Batman, but you have the movies, the comics, the cartoons, etc. Which you could just have
em all in just one folder called "Batman", but then the problem with that is what if
you're looking for media from Cartoons, well, if you had the Batman cartoon folder as a
subfolder of "cartoons" then that would work good, but then if you separate everything
like that then your "Batman" stuff is scattered all over the place. So essentially with
my file manager it's setup with lil data tags for every folder and their contents and then
you can alter the way the data is presented, by like genre, media type, alphabetical, etc,
etc. At some point I'll probably even make it so that it can do it on the files too and
not just the folders...but with 97,000 pieces of media, well, that would be no simple
endeavor.

You spend most of your time looking for fault and placing blame, huh? *snicker* Whether
its "critiquing" someones work or coming up with excuses for your own failures. Maybe if
you spent les time trying to come with failing reasons as to why you suck you might
actually improve...then again maybe not.

First, just for clarification we're talking about pure coding, not designing or anything
like that. Obviously I'm not doing image maps in notepad, but rather as a part of the
graphic design I figure out the points using the graphics program. See that's the thing,
programs like Dreamweaver have some "nifty" built in features, but they're only useful if
you lack the intelligence to figure out other, more efficient ways of doing things. Again
though, that's the difference between someone who learns things on their own and someone
who pays some doofball University hundreds of thousands of dollars to have generic book
read education spoon fed to them on a silver platter with a great big red bow on top.

Any web programming language. Jscript, Java, C#, Python, etc, etc.... In fact I can
program in ANY object oriented language. Now I'm not saying I'm the BEST programmer or
that I know ALL the secrets to mass efficiency and so on and so forth, I'm just saying
that my current level of programming knowledge extends to the same point in EVERY
language.

Nope, error checking is just as quick. Again, you only have book experience so I don't
expect you to know that you can have the file open in both Notepad and in your web browser
at the same time and all you need to do is save in the one and hit refresh in the other to
track your changes. See it's the little tricks and things like that which you learn on
your own, they don't normally teach you efficiency in computer use in college...mostly
because it is an art in and of itself. Whether it's exercising shortcut keys like Ctrl C
and V, or writing batch scripts to do repetitive work for you, it's all an art. You rely
completely on that which you've been spoon fed in college, you lack the understanding and
skill to actually discover more efficient means on your own.

I'm not sure what I find more disturbing, the fact that you're calling me a girl, or the
fact that in that other thread you were sharing rape fantasies about me. o_O

I've never worked as a janitor and I turned down the job because I could make more money
off of them doing contract work.

I know.

Did you claps your hands and drool this time, Retard?

Vinyl, huh? Are you recording in a sound proof room, or no?

*snicker* Is it quote time yet? Heh, I think I'll save those for the next
post...assuming you still have enough stamina to hold out. I've been trying to pace my
responses, to let you breath a lil between posts, don't wanna overwhelm you out of the
game just yet.

Last you heard from who? *snicker* Subscribe to any of the adult baby newsgroups, tell
me what you see....oh, yeah, NOTHING. Why? Cause I obliterated their interest group.
^_^

Or take AHM for example, 75% of the regs are history and the group has degenerated into a
slop hole of unending terminal stupidity because of my actions.

Or take my most recent endeavors in that body art group, I incurred a 300+ post thread in
less than 2 days and dominated 98% of all their traffic for nearly a week. Heh...and it
only stopped when *I* chose to leave. Actually I'd probably still be in that group having
some fun, but I developed a bad Neopets addiction for a good two weeks and that took up
most of my time. `, P

You see, since I'm the best troll on all of Usenet, there is never any shortage of people
responding to me, so really, the fun only ends when *I* get bored...or find something
better to fuck up. ^_^

I have a great deal of respect in many communities...although I usually actively work to
stop it. See I don't like it when people slurp me. Like in the AMV community, holy
fucking shit am I a complete asshole to most of those people. But even though I'm a
complete asshole, my AMVs still manage to get 8.5+ average ratings and that's usually from
putting in only minimal effort. Heh...see when you're one of the best, you tend to go to
pretty desperate lengths to get people to sway against you. My greatest fear is that I
will reach a point where I can become no better. But by attacking people and getting them
to nitpick and quibble over the smallest, most inconsequential mistakes...I can always
strive for more perfection. `, )

Your goal is the same though. Everything you do, is designed to make you feel, to
experience. It's just, you limit yourself too much. When I do something, I usually have
at least a dozen motives behind the action. Within every instance of life there is a vast
well of experience to be had, most people, like yourself barely scratch the surface of
that plenipotentiary...where as I STRIP MINE IT.

What's wrong with the renders, Son? I mean, they look like photorealistic looking Lego
bricks to me....how else SHOULD they look? And it's not even so much the rendering you
should be paying attention to as the original model designs. Well, the Black Hawk was
originally based on the Evac fighter in Aliens...but then I wound up completely
redesigning it.

OOOooo, tell us again about how you're fantasizing about me being a woman and raping me!

That's a lovely excuse for running away. The bottom line is that you're vastly inferior
to me and every new post I make is just one more slap in the face. I mean, look at it
from my perspective, I think you're a boring, talentless little fuck...but I keep
replying. Why? Because I'm better than you and tearing apart your pathetic, failing,
work is just quite the ego trip. You see, if you really were better than me, you would
actually take a LOT of pleasure in responding to my posts, even if I was "boring". Oh,
but yeah, I'm not. Now run away, Wonder Boi, run away and keep dreaming about raping
girls on the Internet and about how you're such an uber incredible graphic arti-oops, I'm
sorry, graphic designer. LOL, at least you aren't so fucking out of it that you would
ever mistake your shlock for art. ^_^

And just for shits and giggles, let's see those links ONE last time:

Yours:
http://www.deviantart.com/view/2382827

Mine:
http://www.backwater-productions.net...inds%20Eye.jpg

*taunts*
"I'm better than you are, I'm better than you are..." `, D

--

Onideus Mad Hatter
mhm ¹ x ¹
http://www.backwater-productions.net

On Thu, 17 Jul 2003 19:45:44 -0700, Onideus Mad Hatter
<mad_hatter@charter.net> wrote:

Yeah yeah, don't worry, it will. We had Mesopotamia, the Egyptians,
the Romans, Dzjengis Kahn, the Chinese, the Great Empire, the 3rd
Reich, and no doubt that the USA will be added to that list too, when
the world has had enough of the way they try to rule the world.
History repeats itself ad nauseum, whether you like it or not.

-m-
--
filmmaker/DP/editor,
Sydney, Australia

"ON ENTRE OK, ON SORT KO"

"Martin Heffels" <mheffels@nwesguy.com> wrote in message
news:adpehvkpmvfmc1bqcub8p0frm4phqmjv4h@4ax.com...
: On Thu, 17 Jul 2003 19:45:44 -0700, Onideus Mad Hatter
: <mad_hatter@charter.net> wrote:
:
: >Actually for the most part it really does. I mean, the ENTIRE economy of
the whole
: >fucking PLANET is pretty much dependant on us. Granted that could be
changed, but it
: >won't be any time soon.
:
: Yeah yeah, don't worry, it will. We had Mesopotamia, the Egyptians,
: the Romans, Dzjengis Kahn, the Chinese, the Great Empire, the 3rd
: Reich, and no doubt that the USA will be added to that list too, when
: the world has had enough of the way they try to rule the world.
: History repeats itself ad nauseum, whether you like it or not.

You won't be around to see the end of American dominance in any event, nor
will your grandchildren.
And while you're thinking of a witty retort look at the modern conveniences
that you now enjoy and imagine what your life would be like without the
American technology of the last 100 years.

And your cinema is soooo good!

*snicker*

/ramalane

--
+++alt.2600/#hack FAQ (by The Voyager)+++
http://www.hackfaq.org

On Fri, 18 Jul 2003 13:16:06 +1000, Martin Heffels
<mheffels@nwesguy.com> wrote:


please dont think that this asswipe represents the USA he is just a
dumb fuck on the usernet ......Scott

On Fri, 18 Jul 2003 06:16:50 GMT, scott <scott@nomail.com> wrote:

Scott actually represents most of the US and world population...inherently fucking stupid
to the nth degree. ^_^

--

Onideus Mad Hatter
mhm ¹ x ¹
http://www.backwater-productions.net

On Thu, 17 Jul 2003 23:46:45 -0400, "ramalane"
<ramalane@ramalaneTINR.com> wrote:

Don't know mate. They are working very hard at the moment to make it
happen soon.

I'm trying to think what modern conveniences you're talking about?
Okok, the lightbulb is a good thing. Many of the great
technology-stuff came from the UK, France and Germany. If you refer to
computers, the British were very active in inventing them too. Even
fastfood was around longer then McDonald's.
If it wasn't for those immigrants which America let's into the
country, it wouldn't be were it was right now. Have a look at Texas
were you would have been now

Yeah, I admit. The Dutch cinema sux :-P

*snicker 2*

-m-
--
filmmaker/DP/editor,
Sydney, Australia

"ON ENTRE OK, ON SORT KO"

On Fri, 18 Jul 2003 06:16:50 GMT, scott <scott@nomail.com> wrote:

I was not under that impression

-m-
--
filmmaker/DP/editor,
Sydney, Australia

"ON ENTRE OK, ON SORT KO"

In article <vheo406mv6moa7@corp.supernews.com>, Onideus Mad Hatter <mad_hatter@charter.net> wrote:
http://cancerweb.ncl.ac.uk/cgi-bin/o...al+personality