Tech Support > Computer Hardware > Desktops > Re: Matrox vs Nividia vs ATi dual head cards?
Re: Matrox vs Nividia vs ATi dual head cards?
Posted by Keith Clark on July 2nd, 2003





The only problem with Matrox is the newer cards are much more expensive than
for example a dual head nVidia based card. And when you're not editing, an
nVidia card is awesome for gaming besides.

3D aside, I'd recommend either Matrox or nVidia. I'm running a Matrox G400
now but the next system I build will have an nVidia Geforce 4 Ti4200 (about
a hundred bucks) dual head card in it because I do like to play the
occasional game.

Both Matrox and nVidia have very good Linux support if that matters.

--Keith


Posted by Aaron Holder on July 3rd, 2003


I for one would never install games on my editing box or anything else that
is not necessary for project work. Keeping your pro system pro goes a
long ways to keeping it stable and uncluttered with garbage. I have a
seperate system for gaming/internet/e-mail. I do agree that Nvidia or the
newer ATI cards are the best options for 3d games. My editing box is a
Matrox G550 dual, and my game/general system is a geforce 3 GTS.

Aaron
"Keith Clark" <clarkphotography@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3F0349DE.18EE0B99@hotmail.com...



Similar Posts