- Re: Suggestions for tweaking system
- Posted by John Navas on July 11th, 2003
[POSTED TO rec.video.desktop - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
Upgrade to Windows 2000 or XP. Use NTFS.
In <f0c1bc20.0307111003.3b9ba80c@posting.google.com > on 11 Jul 2003 11:03:31
-0700, docsavage20@yahoo.com (Doc) wrote:
--
Best regards,
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/>
[Ads belong only in rec.video.marketplace, not rec.video discussion groups, as per
<http://www.landfield.com/usenet/news.announce.newgroups/rec/rec.video.marketplace>]
- Posted by Keith Clark on July 11th, 2003
John - did you even read the guy's post? NTFS is required for large file sizes but it
will do NOTHING to solve his problem - which is most likely related to a heavily
fragmented drive, DMA issues, or perhaps his system just isn't compatible with the WinTv
card.
--Keith
John Navas wrote:
- Posted by Pete D on July 12th, 2003
Also keep in mind that MPEG takes a fair bit of horsepower to encode, I
would recomend trying one of the MJPEG codecs, perhaps the Morgan. As Keith
said the entire system needs to be working properly to work on a slower
system like this. The slower systems that you have quoted probably had
dedicated video in/out cards with horsepower on the card rather than using
the CPU,, TV cards have little HP onboard.
I would not recomend going to XP or Win2k as they both have a much greater
overhead just to run the OS (just ignore John as he posts some stupid stuff
sometimes).
Have a look at www.videoguys.com for their tweaking guide.
Cheers.
Pete D
"Keith Clark" <clarkphotography@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3F0F02F8.34E7AABB@hotmail.com...
- Posted by R. Alan Monroe on July 12th, 2003
In article <f0c1bc20.0307111648.5b96a230@posting.google.com>, docsavage20@yahoo.com (Doc) wrote:
That sounds like interlacing. Play around with the inverse telecine
function in VirtualDub, it can substantially reduce it.
Alan
