- crossover couplerr test
- Posted by Andre De Clercq on May 7th, 2008
I have an RJ45 coupler which is supposed to be a crossover one, but it
doesn't seem to work. Can I test it by adding a crossover cable in the
chain, so that the double crossing results in a standard connection?.
- Posted by Big Al on May 7th, 2008
Andre De Clercq wrote:
- Posted by Big Al on May 7th, 2008
Andre De Clercq wrote:
right? Just to make sure the concept the the crossover is the right
connection?
- Posted by Bob I on May 7th, 2008
Yes, or you can just check the leads for continuity.
http://www.homenethelp.com/web/expla...-crossover.asp
Andre De Clercq wrote:
- Posted by OldDuke on May 7th, 2008
On Wed, 7 May 2008 17:51:46 +0200, "Andre De Clercq"
<andre,declercq@pandora.be> wrote:
Ask elsewhere
- Posted by Bob Willard on May 8th, 2008
OldDuke wrote:
Ignore OldDuke. Most of us think this is a proper NG for the question.
--
Cheers, Bob
- Posted by Walter Wall on May 8th, 2008
"Bob Willard" <BobwBSGS@TrashThis.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:eeLTVQPsIHA.2064@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
You are nearly right.
If we ignore OldDuke (or whatever he is calling himself today), then *all*
of us think this is a proper NG for the question.
- Posted by Andre De Clercq on May 8th, 2008
"Andre De Clercq" <andre,declercq@pandora.be> wrote in message
news:eS4z8oFsIHA.1952@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
- Posted by OldDuke on May 11th, 2008
On Thu, 08 May 2008 06:12:55 -0400, Bob Willard
<BobwBSGS@TrashThis.comcast.net> wrote:
Of course you are WRONG.
- Posted by Walter Wall on May 12th, 2008
"OldDuke" <none@nobody.net> wrote in message
news:61hc24ldfob3jp6i4asnpispp03gua1qk8@4ax.com...
Actually he is entirely correct. Everyone else, except you, thinks that
this *is* a proper newsgroup for this question and you don't count because
you obviously have mental problems.
