I'm looking at the Motorola SBG900 combination cable modem/wireless router. Anybody have any experience? (I'm using an
older, wired motorola cable modem. Do not have a network of any kind yet).


Lady Dungeness
Out of Danger until September
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Look for a unit that supports WPA or WPA2,
The SBG900 only supports WEP which is less secure.

JS

<LadyDungeness@Fish.Net> wrote in message
news:0n8554dr1qj1vno0u31r95n68pma4ujbkr@4ax.com...

Thanks. I don't know what WPA/WEP's are, but I do want good security.


Lady Dungeness
Out of Danger until September
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~


On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 13:08:15 -0400, "JS" <@> wrote:

Those are only applicable if your using a wireless network connection for a
laptop or remote desktop.

--

----
Crosspost, do not multipost http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm
How to ask a question http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555375



<LadyDungeness@Fish.Net> wrote in message
news9b554ddb8q7406383slhnnl6l450hpncb@4ax.com...

WEP provides some security but weak and can be broken.
WPA and WPA2 are much stronger so someone within range
of your wireless router's signal (usually 300 feet or more) can
not tap into your system.

See: http://www.wi-fi.org/knowledge_center/wpa2

WPA Wireless Security for Home Networks:
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/u..._03july28.mspx

And: Implement WPA2-Personal wireless security on a
Windows XP SP2-based Computer:
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/u...ssecurity.mspx

Update for Windows XP (KB893357):
(This update to Windows XP provides support for Wi-Fi Protected Access 2
(WPA2))
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...displaylang=en

JS

<LadyDungeness@Fish.Net> wrote in message
news9b554ddb8q7406383slhnnl6l450hpncb@4ax.com...

My assumption is that one or more of your PC's will be using a wireless
connection.
If this is not the case and all of your PC's will be connected to the router
using
hardwire cables then most wireless routers provide an option to turn off the
wireless broadcast signal.

JS

<LadyDungeness@Fish.Net> wrote in message
news9b554ddb8q7406383slhnnl6l450hpncb@4ax.com...

On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 09:40:47 -0700, LadyDungeness@Fish.Net wrote:

of place HERE.

Ask elsewhere

Hi sugar -- can you spell PLONK?

cHEERS


Lady Dungeness
Out of Danger until September
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 21:15:24 -0500, Gurney <none@nobody.net> wrote:

Thank you for the input. I'm learning, and beginning to figure out what I need. I have three computers -- a desktop and two
laptops. Both laptops have wireless. I'd like to make a small home network and network my printers, scanner, and external
USB storage/backup drive as well. Ideally, I'd like to buy just ONE gizmo to do all this.

I've asked some questions over on the network group, too. Right now, I'm trying to figure out what kind of a router to buy.
Any suggestions?


Lady Dungeness
Out of Danger until September
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~


On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 14:26:00 -0400, "JS" <@> wrote:

LadyDungeness@Fish.Net wrote:
cable modem may not work with the new provider. I might suggest
separate units. One for the communications to the ISP and then a
wireless/wired router for the in house network. As a matter of fact,
my provider actually gave me a combo unit when they installed. So I now
have a cable modem and wireless router spare.

Big Al has a good point, as I just switched ISP providers and my old
(non-wireless) Motorola unit now collects dust.
That old system (although was not wireless) was just as Big Al suggested,
two units (separate modem and router).

No recommendation as I'm not using the wireless part of the new ISP's all in
one modem/router. I'm hardwired and the third PC located in a distance room
is not connected to the Internet and have no plans to do so.

JS

<LadyDungeness@Fish.Net> wrote in message
news:3pu75410tfr7ovt542538m3a97ilv75d24@4ax.com...