In article <ZF2ub.8552$3o6.3762@nwrdny01.gnilink.net>, letoured@nospam.net wrote:
Define "enterprise customer".

--
Evidence Eliminator is worthless. See evidence-eliminator-sucks.com
--Tim Smith

On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 14:18:51 UTC, Stilz <stilz@attglobal.net> wrote:

See:

http://tmfaq.servehttp.com/

Filter all of them, and the [FUD4] subject, then totally IGNORE them,
if you don't want to see their CRAP.

Hope this helps...
--
From the eComStation 1.1 of Doug Bissett
doug dot bissett at attglobal dot net
(Please make the obvious changes, to e-mail me)

In <Skfw30zmcgmz-pn2-5CkIbds4bQyY@x.y.z>, on 11/20/2003
at 11:17 PM, "Doug Bissett" <doug.bissett!SPAM@attglobal.net> said:

The carp here is you and the other ecs shills. In this case you guys are
whining that I told a truth; one PC running one application in a big
company does make it into an ecs enterprise customer.

I'm still waiting for any one you shills to name one ecs enterprise
customer -- using the IBM definition of enterprise customer.

As for you duggie -- as a former IBM employee you know this too -- it make
your comments here the perfect example of the ecs shilling here in the OS2
newsgroups.

I'm sorry dipshit -- but one PC running one application is at a big
company does not make it into an ecs enterprise customer. -- The wish
that it does, makes you the asshole.





In <3FBCCD4B.5A746B50@attglobal.net>, on 11/20/2003
at 09:18 AM, Stilz <stilz@attglobal.net> said:

In <vg6prv4pb73i8gfoddanh56u6v3lmcjpn6@4ax.com>, on 11/20/2003
at 10:40 AM, w.d.hines@nospam.ns.sympatico.ca said:

Gee, you must be starting the cabin fever and constant drinking early this
year, eh?

In <vg6prv4pb73i8gfoddanh56u6v3lmcjpn6@4ax.com>, on 11/20/2003
at 10:40 AM, w.d.hines@nospam.ns.sympatico.ca said:

In <MPG.1a25ebae1a82526f9896c7@shawnews.fm.shawcable. net>, on 11/20/2003
at 04:10 AM, Mike Tuthill <mtuthillnospam@shaw.ca> said:


What part of "its a moron question," don't you understand mikie?

In <a9aca7aa.0311200006.31cd9d51@posting.google.com>, on 11/20/2003
at 01:01 AM, mmi@nautimail.com (MMI) said:


This is an OS2 newsgroup -- you ecs shills and spammers are the ones who
do not belong here. -- Perhaps if you stop mixing your meds you will come
to understand that and stop showing up here attacking IBM OS2 users.

Karlheinz Schmidthaus wrote:

Because that's not Ed's primary interest. His main goal is to drive
people away from OS/2 by spreading FUD. Unfortunately for him, these
people all seem to upgrade to eComStation. Obviously, that's driving him
so crazy that even plain simple facts don't bother him no more when he's
ranting about OS/2.

--
Luc Van Bogaert

w.d.hines@nospam.ns.sympatico.ca wrote:

I think Ed is very useful providing us with some entertainment :-)

--
Luc Van Bogaert

On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 09:07:52 +0100, Luc Van Bogaert
<luc.van.bogaert.invalid@skynet.be> wrote:

Well, he does do that...and without much prodding with a stick.

gwh

In <6r6vb.7097$sb4.95@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.ne t>, on 11/20/2003
at 05:00 PM, Tim Smith <reply_in_group@mouse-potato.com> said:

Its sure as hell is more them one customer running one application on a
PC. -- IBM gives definitions of enterprise customers. Use theirs.

In <a9kipb.pg2.ln@gort.wanlong.wheels.dtdns.net>, on 11/20/2003
at 06:49 AM, hamei <hamei-not@pacbell.net> said:

I did no such thing -- but maybe you can end the point by showing us some
documentation that tells us how much IBM OS2 is in ecs. -- You twits and
your revered leader run away like scared little boys from that question --
how come?

In <rhrrrvgkom1igu23591hbaboddrnhrf8kj@4ax.com>, on 11/21/2003
at 10:49 AM, w.d.hines@nospam.ns.sympatico.ca said:

It seems your cabin fevor has come early this year. Are you doing the
January drinking in November?

In <3fbdc7cd$0$27402$ba620e4c@reader0.news.skynet.be> , on 11/21/2003
at 09:07 AM, Luc Van Bogaert <luc.van.bogaert.invalid@skynet.be> said:

What you really mean is that you get very, very really angry when someone
points out the flaws in the con-game product that you are fanatical about
-- and you know in your deepest working brain cell that the other person
is telling the truth!

Now grow up and stop your shilling here.

In <3fbdc6b8$0$27402$ba620e4c@reader0.news.skynet.be> , on 11/21/2003
at 09:03 AM, Luc Van Bogaert <luc.van.bogaert.invalid@skynet.be> said:


Stop **lying** asshole. I just want the ecs shills -- like you -- out of
OS2 newsgroups.





Unfortunately for him, these

You have produced no facts that have been asked for.

letoured@nospam.net wrote:

Why? eComStation is based on OS/2, but comes with several enhancements,
(just like SuSE linux has features that are different than Red Hat's
features, but they're both still Linux). That's a simple fact, but for
some reason not simple enough for you to understand, OR you're just
ignoring it so you can keep spreading FUD about it.

People who have decided to upgrade from IBM's OS/2 to eComStation, have
every right to participate in these newsgroups. These aren't closed
newsgroups, and they are not moderated. Furthermore, eComStation users
continue to use their existing OS/2 applications, which of course can be
discussed here. That's a fact as well. Finally, because of Serenity's
contract with IBM, in a way eComStation users, indirectly, still are IBM
customers.

See? Ed chooses to ignore every single fact that has been discussed here.

--
Luc Van Bogaert

letoured@nospam.net wrote:

Of course not. You're so over the top that nobody here takes your rants
seriously. People who get involved in an argumentation here with you
only do that for their own enjoyment and as a pass time. I'm surprised
you even take yourself seriously. And BTW, I am kinda fanatical about
eComStation, because it is such a great product :-)

--
Luc Van Bogaert

Bob St.John wrote:

I didn't know OpenOffice was being ported to OS/2. It's about time. I
use it on Linux (used to run Warp 4) and find it to be very nice. A
free office suite with good support for open file formats is needed on
every platform.

The sooner it's available to you guys, the better. And if it is Serenity
Systems that is making it possible rather than IBM (which seems likely
given IBM's typical attitude toward OS/2 and the fact that it reduces
reliance on Lotus[IBM] software for applications), then they should be
applauded for supporting the OS/2 community (which, for some reason
seems bent on vilifying Serenity Systems and eCS).

Scott

On Sat, 22 Nov 2003 00:33:25 UTC, Scott Bicknell
<sbicknel@hypersurf.com> wrote:

-> Bob St.John wrote:
->
-> > I think it's great that users have this choice available to them. In
-> > the mean time, Serenity Systems is busy working on additional projects
-> > for eComStation users, including the OpenOffice.org for OS/2 and a
-> > virtual machine application with the best support for OS/2 in the
-> > industry.
->
-> I didn't know OpenOffice was being ported to OS/2. It's about time. I
-> use it on Linux (used to run Warp 4) and find it to be very nice. A
-> free office suite with good support for open file formats is needed on
-> every platform.
->

Yep, an alpha version was shown at Warpstock. See
http://www.os2voice.org/VNL/past_iss...3H/vnewsf2.htm for
details.


-> The sooner it's available to you guys, the better. And if it is Serenity
-> Systems that is making it possible rather than IBM (which seems likely
-> given IBM's typical attitude toward OS/2 and the fact that it reduces
-> reliance on Lotus[IBM] software for applications), then they should be
-> applauded for supporting the OS/2 community (which, for some reason
-> seems bent on vilifying Serenity Systems and eCS).
->

That is not the OS/2 Community. It is just the nitwit FUDsters that
keep spewing forth lies about eComStation and Serenity. The twits say
its not OS/2, when of course it is. They say IBM doesn't like it, but
IBM agreed to a contract to provide it and support it and have
provided fixes for problems reported through Serenity. These morons
say that Software Choice is a better buy, when in fact eCS is cheaper
and doesn't require an annual subscription. These guys are either the
dumbest MFIs on the planet or working for m$. Just ignore them. The
real OS/2 community has decided to do so. See
http://tmfaq.servehttp.com/TMFaq

Mark


--
From the eComStation of Mark Dodel

http://www.os2voice.org
Warpstock 2003, San Francisco, October 18-19th -
http://www.warpstock.org