I recently installed a new Asus M2N-E mobo, but OS/2 can't find LPT1.
It's enabled in the BIOS at IRQ7, 378, etc. but I can't print to it nor
does it show up with rmview /irq. I've tried various settings ("normal"
ECP, EPP, and bi-directional are the choices available), but no soap.
Google didn't return any threads about this problem. Have I missed
something simple?

TIA,
Pete


--

Pete wrote:
You need to have the latest version of print01.sys. You can see what
version you have by changing to the x:\os2\boot directory and typing

BLDLEVEL PRINT01.SYS

at the command prompt. The newest (last) version was 10.49. There also
needs to be a statement in config.sys to load the driver as in

BASEDEV=PRINT01.SYS

If the above are done and the port will still not work, then possibly
the motherboard is defective (try the port with another os to see if it
works). It's also possible that the print01.sys driver will not work
with the m2n-e parallel port but that's very doubtful as the parallel
ports are an old standard that hasn't changed in many years. More
likely, then, is that the motherboard parallel port support has some
defect that might be cured with a bios update.


--
Posted with OS/2 Warp 4.52
and Sea Monkey 1.5a

David T. Johnson writes:

Why is 10.49 newer and later than the 10.70 that I have on my system?

tholen@antispam.ham wrote:
Good catch. Device Driver fixpack 3 shipped with bldlevel 10.70 of
print01.sys so that *may* correctly be the last/latest version. It
looks like Warp 4.52 shipped with 10.58 so bldlevel 10.49 was not even
close to the latest.

--
Posted with OS/2 Warp 4.52
and Sea Monkey 1.5a

On Wed, 5 Nov 2008 17:41:22 UTC, Peter Brown
<losepeteSPAM-ME-NOT@ntlworld.com> wrote:

[C:\]bldlevel C:\os2\boot\print01.sys
Build Level Display Facility Version 6.12.675 Sep 25 2001
(C) Copyright IBM Corporation 1993-2001
Signature: @#IBM:10.070#@ Printer ISA/EISA Device Driver-SMP
Vendor: IBM
Revision: 10.70
File Version: 10.70
Description: Printer ISA/EISA Device Driver-SMP

It turns out what was needed is to substitute PAR1284.SYS for
PRINT01.SYS. I suddenly remember that I tweaked this with my v4.50
system several years ago, and it got lost (er, forgotton) in the
shuffle, somehow. Maybe one day those spray on hair people will market a
spray on cobweb remover. LPT1 now shows up in rmview /irq right where
it's supposed to on IRQ7. The printer still won't print, but this could
be because 1) that I may have accidentally plugged that LTP1 bracket in
bacwards or 2) a question of changing "normal" to "bi-directional" in
the bios. Reconnecting the cables to box 1 after taking it out of it's
cubbyhole is a bit of a pain, so I'm waiting for one more item which
needs to be added before I open it up.

Thanks,
Pete

--

Pete wrote:
problems with printing to LPT1 (although actually on ECS 1.2R) and I am
just curious.
Regards
Peter

On Tue, 13 May 2008 07:33:11 UTC, Peter J Seymour
<mozng@pjsey.demon.co.uk> wrote:

From the BIDI package readme:

"The bi-directional parallel port printing solution is a set of OS/2
executable files that
enables the print spooler to communicate in both directions with
parallel port attached
printers. The print spooler uses this method of communication to
identify printers
(automatic presentation driver configuration), to query printer status
and capabilities
and to support remote operator panel features. In cases where ECP is
able to
be negotiated, a higher through put will be achieved and less system
resources
will be used (only when operating without Lexmark and HP protocol
converters)."

This package includes an upgraded PARALLEL.PDR, which needs to be
installed along with PAR1284.SYS. If you switch to this driver be sure
to rem PRINT01.SYS, or your system will trap during booting.

The bidi package is still available from:
ftp://ftp.boulder.ibm.com/ps/products/os2/os2ddpak_cur/

My printer is a Panasonic KX-P2023, which up until I installed the M2N-E
was working quite nicely. It still isn't "working", and the next thing
to check is to see if I plugged in the LPT bracket's cable correctly on
the mobo (a operation which requires crawing around behind and
underneath the desk in order to unplug cables (pluggin them in is a
little difficult). Originally, I had three parallel printers on LPT1
using a selector switch. Several years ago the HP 4500-DN got moved to
another room, so it became a network printer. A few days ago I changed
the Epson 980 to USB because of this LPT1 problem, but the KX-P2023 is
parallel only. I did get it to work as a network printer using a
Trendnet TE100-P1P mini print server, but it was a bit "slow". Since I
need to print to this using Wordstar, back to LPT1, unless I can get the
WS's dos printer drivers to print to a network printer, which I haven't
quite figured out yet.

Pete

--

On Mon, 12 May 2008 23:31:20 UTC, "David T. Johnson" <djohnson@isomedia.com> wrote:

Hmm. . .

I have:

(0)[F:\os2\boot]bldlevel print01.sys
Build Level Display Facility Version 5.59.105 Mar 15 1999
(C) Copyright IBM Corporation 1993-1999
Signature: @#IBM:10.068#@ Printer ISA/EISA Device Driver-UNI
Vendor: IBM
Revision: 10.68
File Version: 10.68
Description: Printer ISA/EISA Device Driver-UNI

. . .on my WSeB system. Apparently there's a newer version, 10.70?

Do you know where can I grab it? Many of the IBM sites seem to be
changed or gone.

--
Best,
Erick Andrews
delete bogus to reply

On Tue, 13 May 2008 18:25:20 UTC, "Pete" <khadhargo@sbc...nospam.-.global.net> wrote:

Great!! I Bookmarked it and am downloading bidi.exe.

Thanks.

--
Best,
Erick Andrews
delete bogus to reply

1.) is PRINT01.SYS in config.sys ?
2.) rmview /irq will only succeed if you enable IRQ on print01.sys:
BASEDEV=PRINT01.SYS /IRQ

Lars

"Pete" <khadhargo@sbc...nospam.-.global.net> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:dyNtG3SnKjcq-pn2-s9pmiV3gqiNt@localhost...

On Thu, 15 May 2008 00:31:52 UTC, "Lars Erdmann" <lars.erdmann@arcor.de>
wrote:

In addition to that: boot at least once with "Full hardware
detection" enabled.



--
Ruediger "Rudi" Ihle [S&T Systemtechnik GmbH, Germany]
http://www.s-t.de
Please remove all characters left of the "R" in my email address

On Thu, 15 May 2008 00:31:52 UTC, "Lars Erdmann" <lars.erdmann@arcor.de>
wrote:

Thanks, /IRQ did the trick with print01.sys. I went back to it because
using PAR1284.SYS seemed to be causing lockups whenever I opened a
Win-OS2 window. The plug on cable for the LPT riser on the mobo wasn't
making good contact--either driver works ok except for the Win-OS2
problem. Now all I'd like to do is get Wordstar to print to it--no
success yet-- because WS will print in bi-directional draft, meaning the
print head prints L to R and then the next line R to L and so on
(Panasonic KX-P2023). The mobo is an M2N-E. not an M2N-E SLI, and the
manual says precious little about LPT1.

Pete

--

On Sat, 17 May 2008 21:06:06 UTC, "Pete"
<khadhargo@sbc...nospam.-.global.net> wrote:

I also use WordStar 7.0d under OS/2. I set the printer driver in
WordStar itself and then print to the NULL Driver in the OS/2 Print
listings. This works fine for me. I guess the key is whether WS
supports your printer. I use a ProWriter (C-Itoh 8510) Also a
Panasonic KXP-1124i that I got working under WS. I know I fiddled
with these drivers under WS's ability to modify print drivers - but
that was years ago. One of my two Panasonic (WS) drivers emulates an
IBM which the 1124i was able to do.
Paul
--

On Tue, 20 May 2008 02:00:00 UTC, "PaulRS" <prschmi@Zverizon.net> wrote:

Thanks, I'll fiddle around in wschange. I prefer the bi-directional
printing because all I use is draft, and it takes half the time to pint
a few pages of code. The KX-2023 used to work with the old mobos (486
and Abit KT7E), but this is a new mobo, so I thought it might be doing
something funny.

Pete

--

On Tue, 20 May 2008 03:03:18 UTC, "Pete"
<khadhargo@sbc...nospam.-.global.net> wrote:

One other point I thought of . . . WS hogs processor time when in use.
Watch the processor graph at the bottom of the screen when you try to
print. Initially it hogged so much it would not print. Three
options: from the properties of the WS icon in OS/2 (1) Background
execution off when in the background (not in focus) - This may get
printing started. (2) Set the two idle seconds=0, idle sensitivity=1
or 2. (3) If you have a really fast mother board you may need to get
a programe called TAME (www.tamedos.com). The key will be the
processor usage when WS is running or printing. With my 3GHz Pent 4
option 2 worked for me with WS. However, I had to get TAME for Dbase5
(DOS).
--

On Tue, 20 May 2008 03:22:50 UTC, "PaulRS" <prschmi@Zverizon.net>
wrote:

One more thing you may have already tried: at a DOS box prompt type:
This will send this OS/2 file to lpt1 - if it prints, then the port is
working and your problem is elseware
--

In article <dyNtG3SnKjcq-pn2-PY5HbI3nTMZl@localhost>
khadhargo@sbc...nospam.-.global.net "Pete" writes:

I've been using WS-DOS 7c with varous generations of OS/2 without
problems (except the print delays, which ISTR got solved by those
settings in the Properties). My HP DeskJet 500 works well. Then
I obtained the PostScript PDF -- as in Printer Definition File --
whose output converts to PDF via Ghostscript but can require geek
savvy for proper adjustment unless you are happy with the default
typeface set supplied by Philip Griffin-Allwood. For making HTML
I use my own WS2HTML converter (see past posts and Google).
--
Andrew Stephenson

Sidetrack question here Paul!

PaulRS wrote:

Have you or anyone here that has or still uses WordStar 7 in DOS with OS/2 been
able to get rid of the original file opening lockups with it? I still use it
all the time for my major program because of the touch-typing interface and so
on.

But the one thing that has haunted me ever since it came out is that in OS/2 if
I attempt to open the first file VERY quickly before the original first screen
comes up as WS 7 is loaded, I'll get a SYS3170 error in the DOS-VDM session or
I'll get a complete lock for the DOS-VDM that has to be force shut down. This
was never a problem on WS 6, only with WS 7.

Following either one of these events, what will be in the system is that the
temporary files for the file attempted to be opened for editing will be still
on the disk which are coded with the .$?$ extent. Until you manually go in and
delete the temp files you can't edit that file again. For all these years now
I've had a little utility batch file in the C:\WS directory I call CLEANUP.BAT
which has in it:

del *.$?$

I simply run it after any of these lockups in whatever directory I was
originally working in and problem is gone.

This problem is never present in any child process opening of WS 7 with the
desired file called as part of the command line. It ONLY happens if you don't
let the initial window and file directory display not be present as you lead
that with the hand-typed file you want to edit and hit the <CR> before the
first screen display opens. You never see it if that first screen file
directory display is on before you hit the <CR> for the action to tell WS 7 to
open that file.

To my research it looks like WS 7 is going into an infinite loop somehow in
it's opening file action and hanging the DOS-VDM in a 100% CPU loop, or if it
doesn't do that it pops a SYS3170 PMSHELL error. I've experimented with a
whole host of WSCHANGE parameter changes trying to figure out how to stop this
and never been able to do it. What it looks like is happening is that the
creation in the file opening process which adds the .$?$ files to the directory
confuses the file directory loading process for WS 7 that then pops that part
of the WS 7 code into either the endless loop mode or the SYS3170 trap I get.

Do you or anyone here know how to fix this one little annoying buglette?

THANKS!


--


--> Sleep well; OS2's still awake!

Mike Luther

In article <48415592$0$4075$bbae4d71@news.suddenlink.net>
mike.luther@ziplog.com "Mike Luther" writes:

Mike:

I have, since 1995, used WS-DOS 7c under OS/2 Warp and eCS-1.2
with no sign whatsoever of the problems you describe, either a
lockup at opening, or problems with WS not destroying its temp
files. Before that I ran WS under real DOS (various including
Evil Empire (IBM), Shoddy Empire (M$) and DR-DOS up to 7), w/o
problems.

If for example I crash a WS VDOS session (eg, when writing DOS
software that happens to run amok), WS cleans away the rubbish
temp files when I restart.

At the risk of sounding facetious (but not actually being it),
why not wait a second or two longer when you start? As to the
temporary file problem: no ideas, sorry.
--
Andrew Stephenson

On Sat, 31 May 2008 13:41:40 UTC, Mike Luther <mike.luther@ziplog.com>
wrote:

I attempted to do what you mentioned with no success (the buglet). Quite
some time ago I read that the very last version of WS was something like
"7k"; I have "7h". I also have WS 6, but after upgrading to 7, I didn't
find the improvements all that great (they may have had to do with the
prieveiw function, don't recall). For documents, I dumped WS7 in favor
of Papyrus years ago (Describe and Clearlook were too convoluted).

I use WS4 for programming because it doesn't have all the extra bells
and whistles which WS7 uses for the print preview, the printer drivers
run the print head both ways (L ro R and R to L), and pagination and
printing of page numbers when printing a non-document. All I print on
when writing code is a Panasonic KX-P20203 in "dot matrix draft" font on
tractor feed paper. Both WS4 and WS7 have a feature which I haven't
disovered in other word processors: mark a block of text, ^K (release
the ^ key) then " or ', which changes the case of the marked text,
helpful when you've been merrily typing along without realizing the caps
lock key has been on.

This uses WS keyboard commands:
http://www.writeandset.com/english/indxf.html
The only thing I don't care for is the complexity of printing.

I've also experimented with EE, EEE, and MED--Mr. Editor--which
highlights in color according to the syntax type. However, with all of
these, the OS/2 omni driver won't run the printhead both directions, at
least I've never figured out how, and this slows down printing
considerably. I just now went back and took another look at MED (it has
some WS-like key commands and the capability to assign macros to
selected keystrokes), and I think I'm going to buy a license. Started
using WS in CP-M days (v2.0, I think).

Pete

--