I have just moved house and the local rural exchange is due to get
broadband by 31 December 2005. Meantime, I can only connect to the
Internet at 28.8k using dial-up. The previous owner had Home Highway and
that equipment is still in situ but now redundant.

Should I be pushing BT to try and improve the line or will it be capable
of decent broadband speeds as it is? I have been told that broadband
uses different technology, so a poor dial-up connection may not matter.
Voice calls are OK.

I am 3km by road from the exchange and the BT Wholesale Availability
Checker says:

"Our initial test on your line indicates that you should be able to
have an ADSL broadband service that provides 2Mbps, 1Mbps, 512Kbps or
256Kbps line rate."

This seems promising, but I would welcome any advice from the experts
here.
--
Rab
Please use Reply-To: address
Anything sent to From: address may not be received

My dial up connection was almost always very slow. 28.8 was not so
bad! Since upgrading to broadband there is no problem maintaining a
2Mbps connection. In retrospect it looks like my dial up modem was
suspect but I tried four different ones with different results.
Connection were always slow. The last really slow dial up was using a
V92 HaM. My current ADSL modem is one of the much maligned Speedtouch
330 but it works a treat!

--
Steve Wolstenholme Neural Planner Software

EasyNN-plus. The easy way to build neural networks.
http://www.easynn.com

On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 14:23:27 +0000, steve@tropheus.demon.co.uk wrote:

Sounds like you could have been on a DACS, which was responsible for
the slow connect speeds. This'll have been removed when you had
broadband installed, and if you plug your modem in straight into the
wall socket (ie not via the filter) I bet you'll get a connection
faster than before...

In article <TfyoO2UPq1bDFw8U@delete.spam.invalid>, Rab C wrote:
Someone more knowledgable than me could say if HH equipment will degrade
the speech path. My gut feeling is that it will do. The HH equipment at the
exchange and in your premises ought to be disconnected.
I think it's the HH equipment that's affecting your dial-up modem speed, in
much the same that DACS would. The fact that HH was OK means that ADSL
should be no problem. The line limit for HH is more stringent than for
broadband.


--

Jock Mackirdy
Bedford

In article <a0qum115e4otbn67oeqnmfcjl20qaouas8@4ax.com>, wrote:
An interesting concept - DACS and HH on the same line. Please wake up at
the back of the class.


--

Jock Mackirdy
Bedford

On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 14:45:50 +0000, Jon@Smyth.invalid wrote:

No, that's not the case. No shared lines.

--
Steve Wolstenholme Neural Planner Software

EasyNN-plus. The easy way to build neural networks.
http://www.easynn.com

Jon@Smyth.invalid wrote in
a0qum115e4otbn67oeqnmfcjl20qaouas8@4ax.com:

What *is* a DACS? I gather DACS and broadband don't coexist: when I was
ordering broadband for a customer (who also had max 28 kbps dialup), the BT
line check said that there was a DACS on the line which would have to be
removed, taking a but longer than BT's normal order-to-activation delay. But
what does a DACS do: why would it be on a line? The line was originally
installed as a fax/dialup line.

I've heard that a DACS is associated with line-sharing, but in what way is
the line shared? Two "lines" down one twisted pair to the exchange?

On Mon, 7 Nov 2005 16:02:28 -0000,it is alleged that "Martin
Underwood" <news@isp.net> spake thusly in uk.telecom.broadband:

[snip]

shared over one copper pair. It's a replacement for the old WB series
analogue carrier units which in turn were a replacement for the old
shared service connection (party line).

If the fax/dialup line was a second line at the premises, it's likely
BT did it due to a shortage of pairs to your distribution point.

It's limited to a data rate of 28.8kbps and due to the sharp cutoff
filters and the use of digital carriers on the physical pair back to
the exchange, it's totally incompatible with pretty much everything
but a bog standard voice line (ok for fax lines though).

More info is available here: http://frank.gwc.org.uk/~ali/dacs/

HTH

--
The follies which a man regrets most in his life are those
which he didn't commit when he had the opportunity.
- Helen Rowland

On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 14:55:50 GMT, Jock Mackirdy
<jock.mackirdy@ntlworld.com> wrote:

original poster. Wake up there at the front Jock!

On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 15:32:19 GMT, Don <donald@xxxxxx.notvirgin.net>
wrote:

companies seem to assume everybody that everybody has a broadband
connection. On my dads PC, he'd log in once every week or so, and each
time it'd take him 40-45 mins to update virus definitions before he
could check his email!

One thing to note of course is that the broadband microfilters will
slow a modem down unless you bi-pass it when dialing up.

Rab C wrote:
If the equipment is still connected to your line that could be one cause
of your poor connections speeds. TRy plugging a phone into the
tellephone sockets on the white box & see if one of them gives you
dialtone..
You will get short thrift from BT if you phone up & complain about
connection speeds

Check that box, if you do get dial tone from one of the tele ports
contact BT & ask for it to be removed (it's not as easy as just cutting
the cable feeding it I'm afraid)..

Chip wrote in
5v0vm11jpf0ntar8aljv7bu4cps3khh26v@news.virgin.net :

That's plausible. I think the customer *did* say that this line was
installed more recently than the original voice line to his house. I presume
in order to supply broadband on the second line, BT will now need to fit an
additional copper pair to the house.

How do BT install additional wires between a house and the exchange? I
presume there are normally many spare pairs in the cable bundles that run
from the green box distribution point in the street to the exchange, to
allow for new houses or new lines. What happens if there aren't spare
pairs - is there a way that a brand new pair can be installed underground to
the box and from there, either underground or overground to the house? It's
something I'd never really thought of until now: the logistics of installing
a brand new pair to a house. Is lack of spare local loop pairs ever used as
justification for not being able to supply broadband, assuming that you're
within the maximum line length, or will BT always install extra pairs to
provide the service?

Is a DACS only used for providing multiple lines to the same house, or can
it sometimes to be used to provide a line to a house that has never had a
phone before when there are insufficient lines to a street, by sharing the
pair with another house? My parents have a holiday cottage in a remote
village and when they first had a phone installed they were told by BT that
the only way it could be done was for BT to fit a multiplexer to allow a
second "line" to run over an existing pair to a neighbour's phone. I imagine
that this was a DACS or one of its precursors. They seem to have removed
this now, as dialup can achieve a respectable 45 kbps rate and there's no
longer a big black box on the wall before the master socket.

On Mon, 7 Nov 2005 18:11:12 -0000,it is alleged that "Martin
Underwood" <news@isp.net> spake thusly in uk.telecom.broadband:

[snip]

That would seem likely. I am unfamiliar with their exact procedure on
that, but I believe they will _attempt_ to get DSL to a customer but
not at the cost of telephone service which remains their number one
obligation.

Often, but not always. The main cable to the cabinet may also run out
of pairs. But usually from my experience and anecdotes from others,
it's the cable from the green cabinet [PCP] to the distribution point
itself (small junction box on the pole, or possibly a small 'handhole'
type box in the pavement/road) that might be the issue. This cable is
often a very small number of pairs, (20 pairs down to 5 pair I think)
and it's perfectly simple to run out these days where many people have
2 or 3 lines, and the line plant was installed for 1 line per house.

On that I have no idea. I think where they can install new pairs, they
will, but if it's going to cost them thousands of pounds for one line,
they would probably not do it unless under a legal obligation.

I would imagine that if the multi-hundred pair cables to the PCP ran
out of capacity, common sense would dictate "you have large demand,
install cables". (applying common sense to a utility company often
turns out to lead to incorrect answers however).

They used to install them sometimes on the pole or remote from the
house, there was no hard and fast rule that said it had to be to one
property. They do whatever's necessary to supply phone service. That
said, these days I don't think they fit them anymore (I am probably
incorrect there and will be told so if that's the case, no doubt
<grin> )

Yup, that would have been the DACS.

--
"I think computer viruses should count as life. I think it says something
about human nature that the only form of life we have created so far is
purely destructive. We've created life in our own image." - Stephen Hawking

In message <VA.00000252.001d8e07@ntlworld.com>, Jock Mackirdy
<jock.mackirdy@ntlworld.com> writes
Availability Checker when it suggested I could get a 2Mb connection! All
I have to do now is choose the right ISP and broadband package

Rab
--
Rab
Please use Reply-To: address
Anything sent to From: address may not be received

In message <436f90e1$0$1481$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader01.plus.net>,
Kraftee <kraftee@kraftee.plus.nospamming.invalid> writes
modem is actually connected to one of them. Plugging the modem directly
into the master socket (which is just next to the HH box) makes no
difference, however - I can still only connect at a maximum of 28.8k.

Will the HH box have to be removed to allow a broadband connection? If
so and trusting that the exchange *will* be broadband enabled by 31
December, I may leave things as they are until I get broadband set up. I
take it an engineer would need to visit in these circumstances?

Thanks for your help,
Rab
--
Rab
Please use Reply-To: address
Anything sent to From: address may not be received

Rab C wrote:
The poor connection speeds for your analogue modem will probably be
caused by the 'fall-back' relay inside the NTE9. This should be removed
before your DSL will work, unless you have a newer model with one yellow
socket. If you have one of these then (supposedly) the DSL signal will
be ok, but personally for peace of mind I would put in a request to get
the blasted thing removed.

Oh by the way what you are calling the master socket isn't, at the
present moment, try removing the faceplate & using the test socket that
could well show you a difference. The faceplate , at the present moment
isn't directly connected to the back, test socket it feeds the NTE9
(white box) & a feed comes back from that to the socket on the
faceplate.

In article <717CUML28IcDFwTv@delete.spam.invalid>, Rab C wrote:

The fact that the HH box is live indicates that the corresponding HH box is
still connected at the exchange. The HH installation will (should) be
removed by BT when the broadband connection is made at the exchange. Are
you able to try out the data connection on the HH box to see if it's still
live as well? Without an ISP account I don't suppose you could do a lot
with it.


--

Jock Mackirdy
Bedford

Jock Mackirdy wrote:
Without a ISDN TA there isn't a lot he could do to check it either..

Kraftee wrote:
Also as implied in my original posting the box may be in fall back mode
& hence only have dial tone on one socket, the way to check this is to
remove the faceplate & plug a phone in there. If there is dial tone
then the box is in fall back mode & is connected to the PSTN side of the
exchange if there is nothing or just 'battery blow' then he is still
connected to the ISDN equipment at the exchange, but with the connedtion
speeds he is getting I'd bet good money it is the former not the
latter....

In article <4371320f$0$1490$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader01.plus.net>, Kraftee
wrote:
True, I'd forgotten about fallback mode. But I had half-remembered, hence
my statement about the more stringent line requirement for HH to allow for
"proper" ringing and adequate d.c. feed in fallback mode.

--

Jock Mackirdy
Bedford