- Fire in exchange Chatham
- Posted by Bob Eager on July 5th, 2006
On Wed, 5 Jul 2006 18:30:04 UTC, "We Are Devo!"
<devo.usenet<NOSPAM>@googlemail.com> wrote:
That would be 01634, surely?
--
Bob Eager
begin 123 a new life...take up Extreme Ironing!
- Posted by Bob Eager on July 5th, 2006
On Wed, 5 Jul 2006 20:22:59 UTC, "We Are Devo!"
<devo.usenet<NOSPAM>@googlemail.com> wrote:
Don't apologise. I expected the error to be PlusNet's!
--
Bob Eager
begin 123 a new life...take up Extreme Ironing!
- Posted by Joe Mamma on July 6th, 2006
Bob Eager wrote:
I had heard that it wasn't actually the Chatham exchange but instead the
Bluebell Hill exchange in Medway that was affected.
- Posted by Bob Eager on July 6th, 2006
On Thu, 6 Jul 2006 08:43:46 UTC, Joe Mamma <JoeMamma@Joe.Mamma> wrote:
Still 01634!
--
Bob Eager
begin 123 a new life...take up Extreme Ironing!
- Posted by dave @ stejonda on July 6th, 2006
In message <176uZD2KcidF-pn2-BfhdFnKqqhds@rikki.tavi.co.uk>, Bob Eager
<rde42@spamcop.net> writes
01622 perhaps
--
dave @ stejonda
Think of all the beauty still left around you and be happy. Anne Frank
- Posted by Paul Cupis on July 6th, 2006
Bob Eager wrote:
According to BT Wholesale is it Bluebell Hill exchange and the affected
area code is 01634.
- Posted by PlusNet Support Team on July 6th, 2006
Bob Eager wrote:
Errr, that was my fault *turns a subtle shade of crimson* I misquoted
the number internally and it made it out to service status. I've only
just realised the error after reading this thread. The content itself
though was lifted directly from a BT Wholesale briefing that I received
early yesterday evening.
Regards,
--
|Bob Pullen Broadband Solutions for
|Support Home & Business @
|PlusNet plc. www.plus.net
+------ PlusNet - The smarter way to Internet! -----
- Posted by Robin Fairbairns on July 7th, 2006
PlusNet Support Team <support@plus.net> writes:
interesting. i didn't think crimson included _subtle_ shades.
typical. it's always the case when the people doing the publicity
don't know what they're talking about...
--
Robin Fairbairns, Cambridge
- Posted by Phil Partridge on July 7th, 2006
In article <44ad8cb8$0$953$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader01.plus.net>, PlusNet
Support Team <support@plus.net> writes
A timely response from one of the Plusnet Team!
They must all be on Usenet, hence no responses on the portal support
system. ;-}
(Sorry Bob, but service is a bit dire of late!)
Philip Partridge
- Posted by Sean on July 8th, 2006
The Register done a nice article on this
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/07...exchange_fire/
- Posted by Mugwump on July 8th, 2006
In article <e8o0a4$6pu$1@news.freedom2surf.net>,
seanhardy88NOSPAM@yahoo.co.uk says...
Novas surely?
- Posted by Robin Fairbairns on July 10th, 2006
Mugwump <mugwump@gmail.com> writes:
i could be mistaken, but i caught the slightest hint of tongue-in-
cheekery in the latter end of the post. but then, who's to say that
the writer of the article wasn't classically educated and sufficiently
old-fashioned to believe that the latin plural of the adjective "nova"
would apply here...
--
Robin Fairbairns, Cambridge
