Tech Support > Computers & Technology > Internet & Broadband > Future upgrade from 512k to 1 Mb
Future upgrade from 512k to 1 Mb
Posted by Grim on September 24th, 2004


I am about to sign up with plusnet for BB and want to begin the cheaper
option of 512k. I know there is a £14.99 charge to upgrade later if I want
to do so but are there other problems? I have seen somewhere some talk of
how difficult it has been for people to be upgraded. Not sure whether this
was particular ISp's or from BT point of view.
Can anyone advise me please?

Thanks grim

--
Please take off SHOES when replying.

There are only 10 types of people in the world those who understand binary
and those who don't


Posted by Phil Chung on September 24th, 2004


"Grim" <grim@SHOESedenbc.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in
news:cj0uic$q4c$1@newsg1.svr.pol.co.uk:

I've had no problems upgrading from 0.5Mbps to 1Mbps. Went very smoothly.

--
My photos: http://www.weezer.plus.com/
To send me an e-mail, remove TEETH

Posted by Steve Parry on September 24th, 2004


In news:Xns956E7D7F8674Fpylchungnet@127.0.0.1,
Phil Chung <pylchungTEETH@hotmail.com> fumbled, fiddled and fingered:
Ditto ... very pleased.


--
Steve Parry

http://www.gwynfryn.co.uk

http://www.arrivedeprived.org.uk/

K100RS SE
F650
(not forgetting the SK90PY)



Posted by Peter R Cook on September 24th, 2004


In message <cj0uic$q4c$1@newsg1.svr.pol.co.uk>, Grim
<grim@SHOESedenbc.freeserve.co.uk> writes
all. Paid the £14.99 upgrade fee - they shifted across the remaining
£7.50/month amortisation of the original setup fees. All supposed to
happen on 1st October. No pain at all - will let you know on the 1st if
it actually happens.

Regards
--
Peter R Cook

Posted by Linker3000 on September 24th, 2004


Grim wrote:
to expect a service outage of about 20 mins and that's it.


Posted by Michael Chare on September 24th, 2004


"Grim" <grim@SHOESedenbc.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:cj0uic$q4c$1@newsg1.svr.pol.co.uk...
Your phone line needs to be suitable. If you could order a line before 6th Sept
the in theory you should now be able to get 1mb E & OE

Michael Chare




Posted by Peter Crosland on September 24th, 2004


The difference in price is not that much. Why not order 1MB and see if it is
OK? That way you8 will not incur and upgrade charge. Have you tried the
number checker at http://www.adslguide.org.uk/availability/btchecker.asp ?



Gee Six Jay N Ess at spamcop.net


Posted by pete devlin on September 25th, 2004


In message <2rj9osF1ajslhU1@uni-berlin.de>, Peter Crosland
<g6jns@spamcop.net> writes
What's all this about then? Don't you realise that your email address is
shown unmunged in the "From:" field at the top?
--
Pete Devlin
[{//////news03//////at\\\\\secondrow/////co\\\\\uk}]
Give me a woman who loves beer and I will conquer the world.
Kaiser Wilhelm

Posted by poster on September 25th, 2004


On 25 Sep 2004 in uk.telecom.broadband, pete devlin wrote:

MS Outlook Express only shows the 'real name' not the mail address, so I
guess the poster might not have known. It can be quite a pain as there
may be replies to the same person or department and each might have a
different mail address (an MS OE user may not notice the new address
and worse, each might be automatically added to their address book as
that's one of the [daft] defaults... so if they get a virus they may
be hitting every address to which they've previously replied PGM

Posted by Peter Crosland on September 25th, 2004


OK. I am always willing to learn. AIUI putting the actual address in plain
form enabled to be readily harvested by spammers. The one in the from field
is real unlike the false ones many people use. It is not my primary mailbox
but does enable people to contact me easily direct if they wish. I don't get
much crap in the public mailbox. When my previous email was shown publically
in newsgroups I was swamped with hundreds of crap emails every day. If you
are saying there is better way then please be so kind as to tell me. Spare
me any sanctimony about how dreadful MS Outlook Expressis because it serves
my needs and I am not interested in learning a new reader.



Posted by poster on September 25th, 2004


On 25 Sep 2004 in uk.telecom.broadband, "Peter Crosland" wrote:

so if "g6jns@spamcop.net" is real, as shown in the From field, why
bother (in the past) with the 'Gee Six Jay N Ess at spamcop.net'
(this was the query originally made) ? It would be common to
see Gee Six Jay N Ess at spamcop.net *if* you were using some
mangled/ me@privacy.net address in your 'From:' field so the
infrequent response by e-mail could go to g6jns@spamcop.net

Posted by cw on September 25th, 2004


"Peter Crosland" <g6jns@spamcop.net> wrote in news:2rlslpF1c6r9iU1@uni-
berlin.de:

Take a gander at the headers and sig of my posts, you'll find a whole
variety of different words and phrases you can use so be creative :0)

--
Colin
*Drop DEAD from the email address to reply*


Similar Posts