- How can I find out what speed an exchange provides?
- Posted by bornfree on January 17th, 2008
I want to know the speed that the exchange at Bayswater (WEWBAY),
Central London can achieve.
www.samknows.com doesn't seem to give a speed any more. (I think it
used to, but I am not sure.)
- Posted by kraftee on January 17th, 2008
bornfree wrote:
how long is the piece of string from Bayswater?
Your question is fairly meaningless as no speed is guaranteed from any
exchange but all can supply _upto_ 8Mbps with some of them (if they
have had LLU equipment fitted) it can be _upto_ 16Mbps or even in some
case _upto_ 24Mbps.
There is no promise of what speed you will be able to get & a lot will
depend on your own wiring (that's any wiring in your house), what
equipment you install & how you install it.
- Posted by The Natural Philosopher on January 18th, 2008
bornfree wrote:
www.kizt.co.uk
there is a link to a line estimator. It gave me loads of info about my
exchange, and its speeds were pretty good guesses when I keyed in my
number..
- Posted by The Natural Philosopher on January 18th, 2008
kraftee wrote:
But a fair estimate from your number and postcode.
& a lot will
No, thats rubbish. If the kit works at all, and you haven't any blatant
crap in your installation, the speed you get will be totally dependent
on the exchange, how far you are from it, and the line quality, on ADSL MAX.
With the proviso of course that if the ISP is crap, you may not get
actual *download* speeds approaching what you *synch* at.
- Posted by John on January 18th, 2008
The Natural Philosopher wrote:
Sorry mate but you're the one talking rubbish.
Quick example - over a period of time I've been sent three (yes, 3) HomeHubs
that I never wanted. I had already read of various problems with the
electronics and the way they performed, as well as looking cheap and nasty,
so I stuck with my trusty old BT Voyager 2091, and when that eventually
died, I went over to Linksys.
Long story but to cut it short, I was without the Linksys for 3 days so I
got one of the hubs out as a temporary solution, then one of the others, and
finally the third - and this is the result:
Voyager 2091 - synched at 8096, 100% signal at my property boundary
Linksys WAG54GS - exactly as above
BT Home Hub 1 - synched at 5137, 50% signal (at best, but intermittently
worse and drops)
BT Home Hub 2 - synched at 5583, 40% signal (ditto)
BT Home Hub 3 - synched at 4537, 39% signal (ditto)
Got my Linksys back and all was rosy again - 8096 and 100% signal.
The BT HomeHub is one of the most useless things I've ever come across.
So you see, equipment does matter.
John
- Posted by Obsidian Order on January 18th, 2008
"The Natural Philosopher" <a@b.c> wrote in message
news:1200653027.14724.1@proxy00.news.clara.net...
Can't get it to work, All I get is "Internet Explorer cannot display the
webpage"
- Posted by The Natural Philosopher on January 18th, 2008
The Natural Philosopher wrote:
Apologiew
www.kitz.co.uk
- Posted by Eeyore on January 18th, 2008
Obsidian Order wrote:
It was a typo.
Try this ....
http://www.kitz.co.uk/adsl/adslchecker.php
Graham
- Posted by PeterC on January 18th, 2008
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 10:43:47 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
Humph. Gives me 2M - I get about 1.5M usually, but 700k this pm. Might be
something to do with Homecall/Pipex/Tiscali/rain.
--
Peter.
You don't understand Newton's Third Law of Motion?
It's not rocket science, you know.
- Posted by The Natural Philosopher on January 18th, 2008
PeterC wrote:
Download or synch?
It says I will get 2.9Mbos. In fact I synch between 3.5 and 4.2Mbps, and
if the central heating stays off (sparky stats) will get a BRAS of 3500,
though its down to 3000 again today. Bugger.
Download speeds are typically 290K-310Kbytes/sec
Might be
Well teh download speeds might be due to homecall/tiscali, but the synch
speeds will be rain, wind, people running up motors in your area..etc
etc etc.
Frankly I was on 256/576 for a couple of years, and it was almost fast
enough,. I really wanted more UPLOAD speed. I got 448kbps..any extra
download was a bonus.
Anything over a meg is fine by me..tho its nice to have bloody software
updates come down in minutes, not hours.
- Posted by PeterC on January 18th, 2008
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:55:58 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
um, pass., too techy for me.
If I get 1.8M a Linux distro (~700MB) is just an hour.
BUT, 1.6M (from tray icon) can be sticky in the evening; the current 700k
is quite agile for browsing but I wouldn't try >10MB d/l on it.
--
Peter.
You don't understand Newton's Third Law of Motion?
It's not rocket science, you know.
- Posted by The Natural Philosopher on January 18th, 2008
PeterC wrote:
Synch speed is raw speed router connects to exchange at,. SHOULD be the
primary bottleneck, Certainly sets upper klimit. Web into router to find
out what it is.
Download speeds of actual file is more dependent on ISP issues and state
of internet generally.
- Posted by bornfree on January 18th, 2008
On 18 Jan, 19:01, The Natural Philosopher <a...@b.c> wrote:
Any idea what option it will be under? I have a netgear but it must be
under something similar to all routers.
- Posted by Obsidian Order on January 19th, 2008
"The Natural Philosopher" <a@b.c> wrote in message
news:1200659626.99593.10@demeter.uk.clara.net...
Thanks.
- Posted by The Natural Philosopher on January 19th, 2008
bornfree wrote:
D-link.
- Posted by bornfree on January 19th, 2008
On 19 Jan, 15:56, The Natural Philosopher <a...@b.c> wrote:
I found it. Under Maintenance -> Router status.
Modem Status Connected
DownStream Connection Speed 5408 kbps
UpStream Connection Speed 448 kbps
- Posted by bornfree on January 19th, 2008
On 19 Jan, 22:18, bornfree <justyouan...@xemaps.com> wrote:
Sync Speed
Found it under Maintenance -> Router status.
Modem Status Connected
DownStream Connection Speed 5408 kbps
UpStream Connection Speed 448 kbps
- Posted by Eeyore on January 19th, 2008
bornfree wrote:
With a competent ISP that should be good for close to 5Mbps downloads.
Graham
- Posted by bornfree on January 20th, 2008
On 19 Jan, 22:44, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
It should be good for 5.4Mbps, surely?
- Posted by The Natural Philosopher on January 20th, 2008
bornfree wrote:
equate to around 500kBytes/sec on a good ISP with adequate bandwith.