- MEN who are heavy users of mobile phones have significantly lower..... (IQ?)
- Posted by Lenny on July 21st, 2007
MEN who are heavy users of mobile phones have significantly lower sperm counts than those who are not, according to research that suggests radiation from handsets could be damaging male fertility.
Both the quantity and quality of a man’s sperm decline as his daily
mobile phone use increases, a study of 361 infertility patients in the
United States indicates.
http://prd34.blogspot.com/2007/07/me...ay-suffer.html
- Posted by BGN on July 21st, 2007
On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 12:21:58 +0100, Lenny <lenny@say.no.to.wifi>
wrote:
"The findings, from a team led by Ashok Agarwal, of the Cleveland
Clinic in Ohio, could indicate that the electromagnetic fields
generated by mobile phone handsets are interfering with sperm
production."
I think you'll find that the Cleveland Clinic in Ohio is a heart
clinic, and there's another one which is a children's hospital.
I think you'll also find that making up shit and posting it to your
blog counts as a scientific study.
Kindest regards,
--
-- Nick ICQ: 9235201 EMAIL & MSN: nickmooney@spamcop.net
-- LOTR#4 SKOGA#8 DS#7 BOTAFOT#159 BOTM#2 FBOTY#06 PM#11
-- GSF600n www.bgn.me.uk - Drive until you lose the road
- Posted by Lenny on July 21st, 2007
On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 12:35:09 +0100, BGN wrote:
Well come on. Make up your mind! LOL
No. I think you should understand that the study is what was REFERRED to
by the owner of the blog. The blog isn't the study you silly person.
cordially, as always.
- Posted by tony h on July 21st, 2007
i've had a vascectomy, so i can talk on my phone all day with no worries!
yippee!
"Lenny" <lenny@say.no.to.wifi> wrote in message
news:f7sreu$1r5$2@news.datemas.de...
- Posted by MB on July 21st, 2007
"Lenny" <lenny@say.no.to.wifi> wrote in message
news:f7sq8k$va2$1@news.datemas.de...
Evolution, isn't it. When you look at the people who never seem to be off
the phone then it is probably good for society in general if they are less
likely to breed.
MB
- Posted by ALi on July 21st, 2007
where are you getting your rubbish from....
"Lenny" <lenny@say.no.to.wifi> wrote in message
news:f7sq8k$va2$1@news.datemas.de...
- Posted by tony h on July 21st, 2007
"ALi" <ALi@Junkbox.com> wrote in message
news:18soi.2641$%v3.1499@fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk ...
from the same scientists who insist the world is 6000 years old, and every
word in the bible is absolute truth....
- Posted by R. Mark Clayton on July 21st, 2007
"Lenny" <lenny@say.no.to.wifi> wrote in message
news:f7sq8k$va2$1@news.datemas.de...
greater sexual success than you do, typically using the phone to set up
several liaisons a day, whereas it is empirically obvious you haven't had
any for months or years.
Unsurprisingly when these men are tested there isn't a lot left for the
medics.
I suppose you could emulate them by self stimulation or filing a load of
crackpot posts...
- Posted by Mark McIntyre on July 22nd, 2007
On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 12:21:58 +0100, in uk.telecom.broadband , Lenny
<lenny@say.no.to.wifi> wrote:
Sure - this has been known about since the early eighties. Its nothing
to do with the phones - men who are heavy users of honkin' big cars
with go-faster stripes and leather steering wheels ALSO have lower
sperm counts.
--
Mark McIntyre
- Posted by Mark McIntyre on July 22nd, 2007
On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 12:42:24 +0100, in uk.telecom.broadband , Lenny
<lenny@say.no.to.wifi> wrote:
What has that to do with the fact that its all made up claptrap?
--
Mark McIntyre
- Posted by David Kennedy on July 22nd, 2007
On 21/7/07 12:35, BGN wrote:
Perhaps they should repeat the experiments and this time put the phone
next to the patients ear...
--
David Kennedy
http://www.anindianinexile.com
