Service Status



Service Status Duration Next Update

1: ADSL Dial problems 30 Days 20 Hrs 9 Mins 28/12/2004 @ 14:00

2: Email completely DEAD 1 Days 17 Hrs 0 Mins 28/12/2004 @ 13:00

3: Web Space & FTP problems 1 Days 15 Hrs 54 Mins 28/12/2004 @ 14:00

4: USENET problems 6 years and 65 Days 1 Hrs 27 Mins 27/12/2004 @

AND now the fucking

5: Portal 0 Days 1 Hrs 10 Mins 28/12/2004 @ 14:00

See
http://portal.plus.net/central/forum...ic.php?t=23727

PzychoBilly <GRAVEYARD.STOMP@stomp.com> wrote in
newstj2t0di7ad8hkc1rk0vsqqomh5mp74bg8@4ax.com:

the ADSL dial itself if you read the actual posts.

proportion of accounts are affected but I've checked 5 or 6 and only 1 is
having troubles.


which takes days because of the huge amounts of data that usenet passes
constantly.

hazard a guess that the slowdown in the portal may be due to a fix script
hammering the database to fix 1, 2 & 3.

--
Colin
*Drop DEAD from the email address to reply*

On 28 Dec 2004 12:57:12 GMT, cw <usenet@fidei.DEADco.uk> wrote:

Horse shit.

Horse shit, yeah we know.

So switch the backup on until then!

Dont give up your day job.

On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 13:09:02 +0000, [PzychoBilly] said :-


Well Slick, I hope that Plusnet staff are checking you accessing the
portal/email etc, either via your current IP address or otherwise and
are going to cancel your access.

You have clearly broken the terms of your contract, and if Plusnet do
not cancel your access, then the Plusnet AUP is a nonsense. I hope
you're watching Plusnet.

On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 13:13:36 +0000, Spin Dryer <me2@privacy.net>
wrote:

Ha ha ha they'll have a fucking job shit breath.

You prissy arsed floating piece of shit do you really think anyone
else is gonna fight your battles you fucking fairy flare.

Dirty titshit nanny fuck off and die in a hole somewhere, don't come
back here tillo yoiu have something amusing to say.

Wanker. Tell that to Plus Net.

*snip all the previous stuff*

Please do give me some evidence rather than simply claiming my statements
are horse shit.
I do have several working email/ftp etc accounts, as for usenet have a
look at the stats here:

http://nntp-peering.plus.net/

If you have any clue about usenet architecture you'll be able to figure
out which links to click on and read the data to show you that 1 & 2 are
doing plenty of work whilst 3 is catching up.


--
Colin
*Drop DEAD from the email address to reply*

On 28 Dec 2004 13:25:01 GMT, cw <usenet@fidei.DEADco.uk> wrote:

OK shit face give us one of those plus net emails and I'll send you
some thoughts for the day which you can show us here IF you got
it............ Lying fuck, the whole darn thing has hit shit bottom no
one is getting anything, nothing, zilch, nada STOP BULLSHITTING.

On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 15:14:02 -0000, "Dave" <not.valid.for@privacy.net>
wrote:

They must be on holiday with the PN bozos.

"PzychoBilly" <GRAVEYARD.STOMP@stomp.com> wrote in message
newstj2t0di7ad8hkc1rk0vsqqomh5mp74bg8@4ax.com...
I cant wait to read the replies from the PN fanboys on this one LOL

PzychoBilly wrote:

Yes, please do. I'm with Plusnet and the email problem hasn't affected
me.


higgy.

In article <41d18484$0$48056$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net>,
higgy <higgyslacker@hotmail.com> wrote:

used ftp and I get my usenet fix elsewhere. So, surprised to find these
threads...

Stan

On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 18:23:18 +0100, Stan The Man <man@pr100.com>
wrote:

If you had a life for two days you'd not have noticed, it's now fixed
so even coming back you'd not notice. Lol

On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 15:14:02 -0000, "Dave" <not.valid.for@privacy.net>
wrote:

The response from me (who I know *you* wrongly consider to be a PN
fanboy) is:

1 ? What *is* he on about? AFAIK, there have been no problems with
ADSL access.

2. Yep, that is one *major* cock-up by PN. Probably (but I'm guessing)
exacerbated by the fact that it happened over the holiday period.
Extremely annoying for me, because I was one of the ones whose emails
were actually bouncing, rather than just being held in the queue, so I
have had to re-activate the address with yahoo groups.

3. Don't know. Haven't been taking much notice of that, since I don't
use their webspace.

4. I'm not aware of anything currently affecting usenet that actually
makes a difference to using it. It may be a little slower than usual,
but because of the way I use it, I don't notice that.

5. Not sure what he is talking about. It works fine for me, and I
haven't seen any other reports.

Oh, BTW, the pratt calling himself ""PzychoBilly"" in that post (and
various other things in other posts) is a lot less worth responding to
than you are, and that is saying something. If he actually is a PN
subscriber, and the people who have claimed to have reported him
really have, then I'm surprised he still has an account.

--
Alex Heney, Global Villager
A harp is a nude piano.

To reply by email, my address is alexATheneyDOTplusDOTcom

"Alex Heney" <me8@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:n6n3t0h7a3cit7t369dfad8mo56mteulni@4ax.com...
sigh, sigh, sigh Alex how many times have i told you to read adslguide and
ispreview?

Thats it make excuses for there so called 24/7 support

250mb of web space and you dont use it....erm ok

Surely it should be faster no all the bad boys are gone?

Im not suprised, an idiot swearing PN user I pointed out to staff had
nothing done to them.

PzychoBilly <GRAVEYARD.STOMP@stomp.com> wrote in
news:son2t01p9l7lfujgtbal5sbtqbuoavfv2u@4ax.com:

1) Being abusive helps noone and just makes the abuser look like a
brainless moron.

2) I am not about to go giving out any email addresses to people who
match 1).

3) That the abuser in 1) makes themselves look like a brainless moron
does not necessarily mean they are.

4) I see no further point in continuing over an issue that is resolved
with someone who finds it necessary to exaggerate their own problems (in
order to attract attention?) even when in direct opposition to the
evidence that the rest of reality sees.
--
Colin
*Drop DEAD from the email address to reply*

On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 00:59:08 -0000, "Dave" <not.valid.for@privacy.net>
wrote:

Quite a few.

What is he on about?

I must admit, describing it as "ADSL dial problems" doesn't seem to
make much sense anyway.


Where?


I don't have a website. One day I will probably build one, but until
then, I have no use for the webspace.

I wouldn't have thought so. That might make a difference to some of
the binary groups, but those have never been good enough to satisfy
really heavy downloaders (in common with most ISPs).


The one you pointed out was very debatable whether he was actually
swearing. While the first part of the word he was using is undoubtedly
a swear word, adding "wit" onto it seems to make it far more
acceptable.

But this guy? has been swearing very much more, at a variety of
people, as well as regularly morphing, and is apparently dead set on
causing as much offence as he can.
--
Alex Heney, Global Villager
Nostalgia isn't what it used to be.

To reply by email, my address is alexATheneyDOTplusDOTcom

"Alex Heney" <me8@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:g254t0l5v9d9prp8700p0tfc4et7c0te8m@4ax.com...
While i admit his description of the service wasnt particularly acurate,
even i know what he was refering to and im not a PN user

Just leave your comments at "cock-up" and dont try to water it down with
all the BS about xmas holiday period

What about for storing files??? surely it would be useful as a sort of
backup medium??

Oh come on FFS a while back you and other PN users said once the bad boys
are gone the service would speed up, heck PN staff even basically said that

The user im refering to didnt only swear with the word ****wit but also
used the **** bit singularly on its own.
The latest halfwit TROLL stalking me seems to have a similar problem and
likes to use the ****wit wording in each of his posts, im still trying to
work out if its a mental problem or if he is just pure thick and unable to
come up with anything else

Ah so perhaps i was right when i first thought its a mental problem he has

On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 22:31:11 +0000, Alex Heney <me8@privacy.net>
wrote:

Maybe you'd like to join the Q of whiners? wanker.

On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 00:59:08 -0000, "Dave" <not.valid.for@privacy.net>
wrote:

Maybe they just thought you were a bigger prick than he was?