In article <fb79tv$h39$1@news.datemas.de>, lenny <lenny@say.no.wifi> wrote:

No, that is not what scientists believe. Either you or the Daily Mail
is making it up.

-- Richard
--
"Consideration shall be given to the need for as many as 32 characters
in some alphabets" - X3.4, 1963.

It will be interesting to see how this one plays out:


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/liv...in_ a_source=

Only ten minutes on a mobile could trigger cancer, scientists believe

If it were true, then most of the world would have Cancer, and dependant on
the current percentage of terminal cancer, the world population would be in
a rapid decline

In article <fb79k5$ls4$1@pc-news.cogsci.ed.ac.uk>, Richard Tobin
<richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk> writes
This is bad for you, that is bad for you, perhaps at birth we should be
sealed in an airtight box pumped with scrubbed oxygen and fed with safe
irradiated nutrients intravenously.

If all the scientific experts were laid end to end we could run over the
bastards with a road roller.

Life's a bitch and then you die, some sooner than others.

Mike

--
Michael Swift We do not regard Englishmen as foreigners.
Kirkheaton We look on them only as rather mad Norwegians.
Yorkshire Halvard Lange

In article <i7WPM0Ancz1GFw9j@ntlworld.com>, mike.swift@yeton.co.uk
says...
printed in the Daily Mail. That said, I found a Brass Eye moment in the
Telegraph a few days ago when it reported that churches were considering
allowing mobile phone masts to be placed on spires even though they
could be used to transmit pornography to children!

In the interest of balanced, non hysterical reporting, they appear to
have forgotten to mention that this coverage could enable ambulances to
be called for stab victims etc.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

"Michael Swift" <mike.swift@yeton.co.uk> wrote in message
news:i7WPM0Ancz1GFw9j@ntlworld.com
: : In article <fb79k5$ls4$1@pc-news.cogsci.ed.ac.uk>,
: : Richard Tobin <richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk> writes
: : : : Only ten minutes on a mobile could trigger cancer,
: : : : scientists believe
: : :
: : : No, that is not what scientists believe. Either you
: : : or the Daily Mail is making it up.
: :
: : This is bad for you, that is bad for you, perhaps at
: : birth we should be sealed in an airtight box pumped
: : with scrubbed oxygen and fed with safe irradiated
: : nutrients intravenously.

Ooh, not irradiated, Lenny wouldn't like that..!

: : If all the scientific experts were laid end to end we
: : could run over the bastards with a road roller.
: :
: : Life's a bitch and then you die, some sooner than
: : others.

And some not soon enough.


Ivor

On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 20:34:13 +0000, Richard Tobin wrote:

don't forget to take your pills.

"lenny" <lenny@say.no.wifi> wrote in message
news:fb79tv$h39$1@news.datemas.de...
Sorry, no time to read articles via links, if you have something to say then
please give your opinion here. Scientists and research groups will say
anything for funding. What they say depends on how big the fund is and how
long they can get away with being paid to "research". Isn't it amazing how
there are no cases were radiation from a mobile has been proved as a cause
of death. Not even amongst radio engineers.
People were suffering with cancer well before mobile phones. That must
annoy the "no win no fee" brigade from the local council estate who scrounge
benefits and look for any reason to get money.

"lenny" <lenny@say.no.wifi> wrote in message
news:fb79tv$h39$1@news.datemas.de...
Dear Lenny,

I would have normally bothered to have read the link and responded, but as
it is the Daily Mail, which has been total b*******s during all my adult
life, I feel it is unlikely anything has changed and consequently their
report is not worth [further] serious consideration.

Try and cite a reliable journal next time.

..
scientific experts + Lenny please

On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 21:39:29 +0100, lenny <lenny@say.no.wifi> wrote:

Everything in the Daily Mail is scary, young grasshopper.

What do the expert scientists at the Daily Mail think about aircraft,
UHF TV transmitters, bed bugs and the bleaches and inks they use to
sell their oily rag?
--
-- Nick ICQ: 9235201 EMAIL & MSN: nickmooney@spamcop.net
-- LOTR#4 SKOGA#8 DS#7 BOTAFOT#159 BOTM#2 FBOTY#06 PM#11
-- GSF600n www.bgn.me.uk - Drive until you lose the road

Only 1 fall could kill you.

Expert - ex as in has been, (s)pert as in drip under pressure.

"lenny" <lenny@say.no.wifi> wrote in message
news:fb79tv$h39$1@news.datemas.de...
The article quoted has the phrase "...the researchers did not come up with
evidence that mobile phone signals are harmful..". Now theres a surprise!

Roger

"lenny" <lenny@say.no.wifi> wrote in message
news:fb79tv$h39$1@news.datemas.de...

WHO GIVES A FUCK??

On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 22:31:19 +0100, Michael Swift wrote:

You only need to do that if your immune system is compromised.

Yes, some of them are responsible for developing very harmful systems both
directly and indirectly.

Yours may be.

Moaning about it wont help you.

On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 21:25:18 +0000, Tesla wrote:


1. The immune system often deals with cancers before they become a
problem.

2. The causation and effects of rf are not or are only partially
understood by the experts so where do you get your prediction from?

3. There actually is a cancer "epidemic" right now but it is thought to
be of diverse origins.

4. White European and American is in decline as is shown by the sharp fall
in fertility in this group and the rest of the world may follow as they
catch us up economically.

On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 00:08:14 +0200, xxy wrote:

If you were to read a bit more you'd realise that it was a New Scientist
story reported in the Daily Mail and I would not be surprised if it wasn't
carried in other papers (Telegraph for example).

"lenny" <lenny@say.no.wifi> wrote in message
news:fb79tv$h39$1@news.datemas.de...
I worked on high power radars in my twenties and thirties, long before
people started to worry about radiation and, along with those collegues that
I'm still in touch with, am going strong in my seventies.
Only point of interest is that all of our children are girls.
No doubt some "scientist", carrying out "research" would use this info to
prove something, but even I, as an engineer, know that there were not enough
of us to make this information statistically significant.

Retired

On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 09:30:38 +0100, in uk.telecom.broadband , lenny
<lenny@say.no.wifi> wrote:

This is true of all humanity.
--
Mark McIntyre

"lenny" <lenny@say.no.wifi> wrote in message
news:fb8jjd$45k$1@news.datemas.de
: : On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 22:31:19 +0100, Michael Swift wrote:

[snip]

: : : Life's a bitch
: :
: : Yours may be.

Only since you came along.

: : : and then you die, some sooner than others.
: :
: : Moaning about it wont help you.

So why moan about phones..? You won't stop people using them.

Ivor