- Plus Net Binary News Servers SUCK bigtime.
- Posted by Paul Cummins on January 24th, 2004
In article <YRvQb.18752$tQ6.927231@wards.force9.net>, stinky@poo.com
(Amigo Entertainments) wrote:
Do you have evidence that they are holding, distributing or facilitating
the transfer of Child Porn? If so, do you have evidence that they are
doing so knowingly or wilfully?
--
Paul Cummins - Always a NetHead
Wasting Bandwidth since 1981
begin Who gives a fuck about Outlook Express anyway.exe
- Posted by Paul Cummins on January 24th, 2004
In article <d1wQb.18756$tQ6.928395@wards.force9.net>, stinky@poo.com
(Amigo Entertainments) wrote:
No wonder he thinks I live in Bronze Close - he can't even spell my name
correctly.
--
Paul Cummins - Always a NetHead
Wasting Bandwidth since 1981
begin Who gives a fuck about Outlook Express anyway.exe
- Posted by Paul Cummins on January 24th, 2004
In article <mb3510h3p6uk1a0u8lqp2k76ujbd14l1ae@4ax.com>,
cynical_observer@hotmail.com (Phil Thompson) wrote:
UK: http://www.legislation.hmso.gov.uk/a...8/19980042.htm
The European Convention on Human Rights was incorporated into UK law by
the passing of the Human Rights Act 1998.
As a result we now have a legal right to protection of freedom of speech
and expression.
--
Paul Cummins - Always a NetHead
Wasting Bandwidth since 1981
begin Who gives a fuck about Outlook Express anyway.exe
- Posted by Phil Thompson on January 24th, 2004
On Sat, 24 Jan 2004 01:38:59 +0000, Amigo Entertainments
<stinky@poo.com> wrote:
haven't you got a disco to go to
- Posted by Phil Thompson on January 24th, 2004
On Sat, 24 Jan 2004 01:43:01 +0000, Amigo Entertainments
<stinky@poo.com> wrote:
From: Amigo Entertainments <stinky@poo.com>
Subject: Re: Plus Net Binary Child Porn Servers
Newsgroups: uk.telecom.broadband
Reply-To: stinky@poo.comm
incompetent asshole can't even spell the same false email address
twice
- Posted by Phil Thompson on January 24th, 2004
On Sat, 24 Jan 2004 01:43:01 +0000, Amigo Entertainments
<stinky@poo.com> wrote:
he was. the autobahns were an excellent idea.
- Posted by Alexander Mann on January 24th, 2004
Amigo Entertainments wrote:
I don't think it's good enough for an ISP to say "oh yeah, that is child
porn but, hey, it's usenet" but I'm not sure that's what PlusNet have
said.
Also, you mentioned one group about teens but teenagers aren't all
underage so I don't see why any NG about porn and teenagers should be
removed automatically.
- Posted by Paul Cummins on January 24th, 2004
In article <4012b7d0$0$4100$5a6aecb4@news.aaisp.net.uk>,
alex@letmethink.net (Alexander Mann) wrote:
And how are you exepcted to tell from a picture whether the subject is
14, 15, 16 or 17. two of those ages are legal in any event, yet the
photo could still be of a teen.
Sam Fox first appeared in the Sun on her 16th Birthday. This means that
the photographs must have been taken when she was underage...
--
Paul Cummins - Always a NetHead
Wasting Bandwidth since 1981
begin Who gives a fuck about Outlook Express anyway.exe
- Posted by Bob Eager on January 24th, 2004
On Sat, 24 Jan 2004 15:29:17 UTC, Phil Thompson
<cynical_observer@hotmail.com> wrote:
He's a child...it amuses him...
--
Bob Eager
begin by not using Outlook Express...
- Posted by Mark McIntyre on January 24th, 2004
On Sat, 24 Jan 2004 16:24 +0000 (GMT Standard Time),
agree2pay4uce@spam.vlaad.co.uk (Paul Cummins) wrote:
<mode = tongue in cheek>
and if you do have such evidence, and you've withheld it from the
police, you may want to consider your next move very carefully...
</mode>
- Posted by Mark McIntyre on January 24th, 2004
On Sat, 24 Jan 2004 16:24 +0000 (GMT Standard Time),
agree2pay4uce@spam.vlaad.co.uk (Paul Cummins) wrote:
The joints in the cable will have increased impedence when damp.
Underground cable probably has a *higher* chance of remaining wet by
the way -> longer time to recover.
- Posted by Mark McIntyre on January 24th, 2004
On Sat, 24 Jan 2004 18:34 +0000 (GMT Standard Time),
agree2pay4uce@spam.vlaad.co.uk (Paul Cummins) wrote:
Intuition.
Bizarrely enough, its not illegal to take photos of people.
- Posted by Paul Cummins on January 24th, 2004
In article <h5f510dm19odpino4j07solmed4rmdaf5s@4ax.com>,
markmcintyre@spamcop.net (Mark McIntyre) wrote:
Yup. Wilfully assisting an offender is a criminal offence in itself - up
to 5 years imprisonment.
--
Paul Cummins - Always a NetHead
Wasting Bandwidth since 1981
begin Who gives a fuck about Outlook Express anyway.exe
- Posted by Paul Cummins on January 24th, 2004
In article <c8f510teih2kp28469m77hcbls45438564@4ax.com>,
markmcintyre@spamcop.net (Mark McIntyre) wrote:
In which case, since the line has been damp, as has the ground, since
the day we moved in, then I have nothing to fear from the bad weather.
--
Paul Cummins - Always a NetHead
Wasting Bandwidth since 1981
begin Who gives a fuck about Outlook Express anyway.exe
- Posted by Phil Thompson on January 24th, 2004
On Sat, 24 Jan 2004 18:22:08 +0000, Alexander Mann
<alex@letmethink.net> wrote:
indeed, New Labour lowered the ago of homosexual consent to 16 so such
things have a Blair stamp of approval :-)
- Posted by Phil Thompson on January 24th, 2004
On Sat, 24 Jan 2004 18:10 +0000 (GMT Standard Time),
agree2pay4uce@spam.vlaad.co.uk (Paul Cummins) wrote:
"Everyone has the right to freedom of expression. This right shall
include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information
and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of
frontiers."
receive information
regardless of frontiers
without interference
sounds like an uncensored binary Usenet feed to me :-)
Phil
- Posted by Paul Cummins on January 24th, 2004
In article <2qg5105vncmja94k2jr65h1q67pf0p144r@4ax.com>,
cynical_observer@hotmail.com (Phil Thompson) wrote:
Yup, same here. Looks to me that Plusnet are just complyingwith the
spirit and letter of the Human Rights Act 1998. It would be a petty
person indeed who complains about a company that believes in protecting
these high principles.
--
Paul Cummins - Always a NetHead
Wasting Bandwidth since 1981
begin Who gives a fuck about Outlook Express anyway.exe
- Posted by Roderick Stewart on January 24th, 2004
In article <NesQb.27129$qx2.3148559@stones.force9.net>, Amigo Entertainments
wrote:
Simple. They don't have such a comprehensive selection of newsgroups because
they're inferior service providers.
Rod.
- Posted by Roderick Stewart on January 24th, 2004
In article <9JpQb.18703$tQ6.903686@wards.force9.net>, Amigo Entertainments
wrote:
Define "offending", and please tell us who is offended
Defending what? Freedomn of speech, perhaps?
Rod.
- Posted by Colin Wilson on January 24th, 2004
If you feel so strongly, you will be able to break out of the contract.
A fee may be payable though.
--
Please add "[newsgroup]" in the subject of any personal replies via email
* old email address "btiruseless" abandoned due to worm-generated spam *
--- My new email address has "ngspamtrap" & @btinternet.com in it ;-) ---
