- The Plusnet pipe of doom and the users (OH DEAR!)
- Posted by Dave on November 29th, 2004
Well it looks SO FAR that I was right with regards to the heavy users
ending up being limited in speed terms, and contended take a look at...
http://tinyurl.co.uk/o2kz
The funniest quote IMO is about the "bedding in" process LMFAO sorry PN
(and Ian) but first no GB figure was given to users to reduce their usage
to and now that comment, WTF?
While I freely admit you may be working on any issues that have occurred
due to the moving of users to different pipes, I don't think in a
reputation state things like this will do you any good either now or in the
future, I suspect your phone lines will/are being inundated with unhappy
users, who want it sorted at the least and want a MAC code at the worse.
Im certainly happy I aint a PN user at this moment in time, and with more
and more ISPs now running BTs trial 2mb service I suspect you might lose
more than a few users over this latest episode 
((
- Posted by Bob Eager on November 29th, 2004
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 18:33:09 UTC, "Dave" <notvalid.for@privacy.net>
wrote:
What on earth do these mangled words mean?
'least' is opposite to 'worse' in your juvenile world?
I had no idea they were trialling a 2 millibit service.
--
Bob Eager
begin a new life...dump Windows!
- Posted by Lurch on November 29th, 2004
On 29 Nov 2004 20:18:52 GMT, "Bob Eager" <rde42@spamcop.net> strung
together this:
Apparently Tiscali are at the forefront of it all....
--
SJW
A.C.S. Ltd
Please reply to group or use 'usenet' in email subject
- Posted by Bob Eager on November 29th, 2004
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 20:25:14 UTC, Lurch <theoriginallurch@tiscali.co.uk>
wrote:
So I believe. Although someone else leaked it a couple of weeks ago...!
--
Bob Eager
begin a new life...dump Windows!
- Posted by Ian on November 29th, 2004
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 20:25:14 +0000, Lurch
<theoriginallurch@tiscali.co.uk> wrote:
Are you sure you are not referring to the Tiscali 2µb service....same
price but even 10¯³ slower
Ian
- Posted by Dave on November 30th, 2004
"Bob Eager" <rde42@spamcop.net> wrote in message
news:176uZD2KcidF-pn2-XPLSYYnoYgOd@rikki.tavi.co.uk...
Oh the insults of language again, Very original you dumb fanboy
ZZZZZzzzzzzzzzz
- Posted by Dave on November 30th, 2004
Look at the fanboys go LMFAO.............ATTACK, ATTACK, LOL *over and
over*
- Posted by Richard Sobey on November 30th, 2004
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 00:48:37 -0000, "Dave" <notvalid.for@privacy.net>
wrote:
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL.
Were you /really/ LOL'ing, Dave? You LOL at lot. Were you also LYAO?
- Posted by Dave on November 30th, 2004
"Richard Sobey" <spam@rasobey.co.uk> wrote in message
news:higoq0lffi0o20d6edf0ljge69g0uoiu3o@4ax.com...
Erm "LOL'ing"??????????
- Posted by Mark McIntyre on November 30th, 2004
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 00:47:32 -0000, "Dave" <notvalid.for@privacy.net>
wrote:
If you managed to post in english, perhaps we wouldn't be able to take
the piss. Your comment above is utterly incomprehensible.
- Posted by Dave on December 1st, 2004
"Mark McIntyre" <markmcintyre@spamcop.net> wrote in message
news:tf1qq0tgnesjlsh1j1ba6a06esgkhgki6t@4ax.com...
Sorry, what is "english"??
Did you mean "English"? Or something else?
- Posted by Richard Sobey on December 1st, 2004
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 21:59:21 -0000, "Dave" <not.valid.for@privacy.net>
wrote:
Yes, you do know what LOL means, don't you? After all, you seem to use
the acronym in the majority of your posts.
- Posted by Dave on December 2nd, 2004
"Richard Sobey" <spam@rasobey.co.uk> wrote in message
news
1qrq0pqufbvcfd0gq8uiolf22f7brff52@4ax.com...
Er yes I do, and putting 'ING' on the end of the last word, makes no sense
IDIOT.
- Posted by Richard Sobey on December 2nd, 2004
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 02:02:14 -0000, "Dave" <not.valid.for@privacy.net>
wrote:
Not sure why I'm wasting my time really:
LOL
Laugh Out Loud
LOL'ing
Laugh(ING) out loud.
You see? Do you see now?
- Posted by Dave on December 2nd, 2004
"Richard Sobey" <spam@rasobey.co.uk> wrote in message
news:enetq0p8fh70ejlchf0duhflt4ipkfc2tq@4ax.com...
Yes you technically meant 'L'ingOL' NOT 'LOL'ing' cos as you had it that
would mean 'Laugh out loudING' wouldnt it?
In fact whether i am trying to say...
Laugh Out Loud
or
Laughing Out Loud, its still only 'LOL' what is used, there is no need at
all for any 'ING' lark.
Heres a clue for you, type acronym into google to see how wrong you were.
as for me from this im..
AVHBI
*PS that probably another you will just have to look up eh?*
- Posted by Richard Sobey on December 2nd, 2004
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 12:39:49 -0000, "Dave" <not.valid.for@privacy.net>
wrote:
Thanks, but are you sure you can do without yours?
I'm not exactly sure what this will prove.
I did have to look it up, yes. ATAAMMVTI, though.
Ah, now you have to look that up, don't you.
- Posted by Andrew Sayers on December 2nd, 2004
Richard Sobey <spam@rasobey.co.uk> wrote:
OMG
You're replying to the Troll "dave" aren't you? Most people in here have kf'd him by
now. You've got to realise he is *desperate* for communications and replies, hence
his insolent responses to the majority of intelligent and decent people who post in
here.
The REAL joke is that he spends all his time whinging about PlusNet, but not only is
he not a PlusNet user - he's not even on broadband!! He must be the only dialup
whittering about a bb service!
Best thing would be that we all kf him, then he will eventually go away, and get his
crayons out again.
--
The reply to email address is a valid address of a
proven spammer, quoted with the sole intention of
generating spam for them.
If you'd like to reply to me, then please
use the newsgroup.
- Posted by Dave on December 3rd, 2004
"Richard Sobey" <spam@rasobey.co.uk> wrote in message
news:jjiuq0lpk8vp62m5s4b5s14fe69h66q9vp@4ax.com...
Dunno, but you seem to be in greater need
It will prove that whether i meant "Laugh Out Loud" or "Laughing Out Loud"
there is no 'ing' added anywhere to the LOL acronym.
both "Laugh Out Loud" or "Laughing Out Loud" only use "LOL", not 'LOL'ing'
or whatever twisted imaginary rubbish it was you came up with.
Hmm it would appear from
http://www.acronymfinder.com/af-quer...m=ATAAMMVTI&Fi
nd=Find which knows 373,000+ acronyms that yours does not exist. Are you
sure you typed it right?? Perhaps it needs a space??? Or perhaps its like
you 'LOL'ing' acronym and doesnt even technically exist??? {snigger, LMFAO}
Quite frankly it makes no difference. Like i suspected it doesnt exist MR
'LOL'ing' BOY
- Posted by Dave on December 3rd, 2004
"Andrew Sayers" <inforelation11@yahoo.com> wrote
{His regular, 5 year old ADHD like screaming fit}
It appears now that we have...
Andrew, Bob and Tx2, sitting in a Tree, bee'hatching, whining and moaing at
me.
LMFAO
Poor little Fanboys.
- Posted by Richard Sobey on December 3rd, 2004
On Thu, 02 Dec 2004 21:49:31 +0000, Andrew Sayers
<inforelation11@yahoo.com> wrote:
Hehe...was thinking about doing this yesterday. 25pc of my uk.t.b
database is Dave - I'd say that's a new record 
