- lilo's absurd documentation.
- Posted by not@top-post on March 6th, 2004
Ian Bell wrote:
* testers report the faults but don't fix them. Unfortunately non-hard
faults [like documentation] my not be criticised for political-correctness.
DOSemu [a >10 yr old project]still read: " ..may be installed EVERYWHERE"
because of every body grovelling to pc, who won't tell the author that
in English 'everywhere' is critically different from 'anywhere'.
* the debuggers
* the documenters
* ...etc.
andrew wrote:
What wrong with plain text ?
Lilo is so fundamental to the system, it should be 'doable' with systems
which can't/don't-want-to do X-windows.
Lew Pitcher wrote:
To read the street names or my bus ticket I don't want BUILD anything
or get married !!
David L. Johnson wrote:
OK I vaguely remember seeing some diagrams, when I once did view
the *.ps. But really I don't think lilo documentation NEEDS arty diagrams.
Hooligan Red wrote:
Yes but I'm not talking about "wordprocessor".
What's wrong with plain text ?
James McIninch top-posted:-
Drop dead ! "Works for me" is not a valid answer.
Just like the top-posters and html-emailers.
gnu should work to standards.
"...i386.." shows the idea: compatible with the 'lowest' version.
I believe the proper answer to my question is:
the author of lilo/LILO went on an arty-farty trip exercising various
graphics packages for lilo. Ie. he was more interested in the *.ps
diagrams and presentation that the utility of lilo to the users.
Perhaps since my old RH6.2 version a man/info was added ?
Or vaguely I remember it's called LILO not lilo ?
I'm using my proper OS now: oberon [ETH-native freeware],; flies
like a bullet on any old > 386 scrap hardware.
== Chris Glur
- Posted by Michael Heiming on March 6th, 2004
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
not@top-post wrote:
[..]
If you like an even older distro, I have SuSE 4.2 somewhere
flying around.
$ man -k lilo
lilo (8) - install boot loader
lilo.conf [lilo] (5) - configuration file for lilo
Get a halfway recent distro and you'll get lilo man + info pages.
What a troll!
- --
Michael Heiming (GPG-Key ID: 0xEDD27B94)
Remove +SIGNS and www. if you expect an answer, sorry for
inconvenience, but I get tons of spam.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFASc9NAkPEju3Se5QRAjvRAJ0bucUex3F5rN2HJSPY1P deSl71igCgmxCg
wy+G3kUHu1mY55xsmKkV1eQ=
=iIUq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Posted by Johan Lindquist on March 6th, 2004
["Followup-To:" header set to comp.os.linux.misc.]
So anyway, it was like, 14:06 CET Mar 06 2004, you know? Oh, and, yeah,
not@top-post was all like, "Dude,
I think we've located the problem. You just need to start living in
the 21st century, where lilo is adequatly documented, that's all.
--
Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a banana. Perth ---> *
14:40:18 up 13 days, 21:16, 6 users, load average: 1.15, 1.07, 1.07
$ cat /dev/bollocks "echo y | format c:" Registered Linux user #261729
repurpose compelling ROI
- Posted by Robert Hull on March 6th, 2004
In message <DpednffduaBJUdTdRVn-tA@is.co.za>, not@top-post.?.invalid
wrote
available in RH 5.1 so I am sure that you could have them if you wanted
in RH 6.2
--
Robert Talking to yourself - first sign of madness
Answering yourself back - first sign of schizophrenia
I go one better: If I don't like the answer ...
I put it to a majority vote
- Posted by Wi||em. on March 6th, 2004
Johan Lindquist, je wilde de volgende lettertjes met ons delen:
Or install your distro properly.
man lilo is available in RH6.2 as well
AUTHOR
Werner Almesberger (almesber@bernina.ethz.ch).
28 July 1995
--
Wi||em.
Mailaddress in the header is IPv6 only.
traceroute/ping and nmap scan to your IPv6 host: http://www.ipv6.letrom.net
- Posted by Hooligan Red on March 6th, 2004
not@top-post wrote:
I've always quite liked Oberon and admired the irony of calling one's
computer Lilith (after the goddess who steals men away from their wives
... and stops them getting out and about a bit).
But folks, is this a first for aolm? We've been oberon-TROLLed ;-).
- Posted by Ian Bell on March 6th, 2004
not@top-post wrote:
Are you putting this forward as a reason for *not* contributing? You
clearly are not bothered about being PC so why don't you tell the author of
DOSemu how to amend his documentation.
Ian