- Macs Not Invulnerable
- Posted by John on December 12th, 2003
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,4149,1408924,00.asp
- Posted by Lloyd Parsons on December 12th, 2003
In article <vtkaorl5sqnsb4@news.supernews.com>, John
<nospam@nospam.com> wrote:
technologist that you are, how about telling me exactly how many mac
users have been affected by this?
Feel free to pull the number out of your ass as usual....
- Posted by Jim Polaski on December 12th, 2003
In article <vtkaorl5sqnsb4@news.supernews.com>,
"John" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:
Yeah,yeah,yeah johnny. If you were a sr. technologist you'd know this is
DHCP issue that no only makes a Mac vulnerable, but the PC too.
That's what happens when you just follow like a lemming.
--
Regards,
JP
"The measure of a man is what he will do while expecting
that he will get nothing in return!"
- Posted by Elizabot on December 12th, 2003
John wrote:
Who here has claimed that macs are invulnerable?
- Posted by forge on December 13th, 2003
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 12:54:40 -0800, "John" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:
Oo, now THERE'S an unbiased author (eyeroll).
- Posted by Wally on December 13th, 2003
----------
In article <vtkaorl5sqnsb4@news.supernews.com>, "John" <nospam@nospam.com>
wrote:
You misspelled... www.macfixit.com
- Posted by ScorpionKing@attNOSPAM.net on December 17th, 2003
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 12:54:40 -0800, "John" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:
John, I suspect that Macs have had fewer viruses then you... Or shall
I call the STDs?
--
Like a game of pick up stick played by fucking lunatics
- Posted by Elizabot on December 17th, 2003
ScorpionKing@attNOSPAM.net wrote:
Just VDs: Virtual Diseases
