- Atmega8-L at 8MHz internal oscíllator not stable?
- Posted by Antti on July 25th, 2007
Hi
I am not believing what I see, but I have a board where ATmega8L
doesnt want to work with 8MHz internal oscillator setting - the
datasheet does not say its invalid setting, and I think I have used
it before, but now this board only works at 4MHz or at 8MHz
when the OSCCAL is written to lower value <112 to reduce the
internal clock - any ideas what could be wrong?
Antti
- Posted by linnix on July 25th, 2007
On Jul 25, 11:00 am, Antti <Antti.Luk...@googlemail.com> wrote:
What VCC? Sometimes they only work full speed with high voltage.
- Posted by Antti on July 25th, 2007
On 25 Jul., 22:06, linnix <m...@linnix.info-for.us> wrote:
actually its the other way around, 
my design is targetting 3.3V and it works at 3.3V and 8MHz,
but I had the programmer giving 5V VCC, and at 5V it DOES NOT WORK.
this is weird. at atmega8 at 5V and internal 8MHz starts does
something
so that can make LED on, but trying to call a subroutine makes all
dizzy
unless the OSCCAL is heavily adjusted down..
my guess is that the 8L chip runs up to 8MHz and little above, but
that
the internal oscillator will run way over 8MHz at 5V
Antti
- Posted by larwe on July 25th, 2007
On Jul 25, 4:47 pm, Antti <Antti.Luk...@googlemail.com> wrote:
My guess is that the POR signal timing is wrong at 5V. Take all
components off the _RESET line and see what happens.
- Posted by Antti on July 26th, 2007
On 25 Jul., 23:00, larwe <zwsdot...@gmail.com> wrote:
I guess your guess is wrong, at 5V the atmega is starting execution of
instructions
as long as I dont use stack the MCU works, that is I can blink a led
in simple loop
but as soon as stack is used the mcu goes wild..
Antti
- Posted by TT_Man on July 26th, 2007
"Antti" <Antti.Lukats@googlemail.com> wrote in message
news:1185426468.756526.59970@w3g2000hsg.googlegrou ps.com...
so at 5V you may be OTT( overclocked?)
- Posted by MK on July 26th, 2007
"TT_Man" <Someone@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:ny1qi.2007$ph7.1277@newsfe5-win.ntli.net...
Antti - why don't you try mega48/88 - pin compatible, has on chip debug,
bigger safe operating area for clock/volts and the 48 is cheaper thna the
mega8 you are using.
Michael Kellett
www.mkesc.co.uk
- Posted by Antti on July 26th, 2007
On 26 Jul., 17:53, "MK" <nos...@please.com> wrote:
thanks, yes well actually mega88 QFN is easier to obtain than m8, so I
may from that reason use it for production runs, but on the dev board
its M8, but its no problem any more as it does work at 3.3 and that is
what I need. m48 is cheaper than m8 but unfortunatly I need 8K full
(over 4K is unrolled blowfish encryption key). m8 price is cool
0.80
havent checked m88 pricing yet
Antti
- Posted by Antti on July 28th, 2007
On 26 Jul., 18:12, Antti <Antti.Luk...@googlemail.com> wrote:
i was too quick claiming that Atmega8-L works at 8MHz-3.3V
a simple loop works 8MHz 5V and 3.3V
a loop with function call fails at 5V, works at 3.3V
a looped no stack use with algorithm and rom tables fails at 5 and
3.3V and 8MHz !
it starts working stable somewhere at 6.8MHz
this is really annoying, Atmel datasheet doesnt say that 8MHz
operation is
not working at all for Atmega-8L !
and whats worse depending on the firmware it MAY work, until firmware
change
that makes it failing fully
Antti
