Forced to program without text , you mind will
go much faster , because you will learn the CPU's
methods and remember them as images , not long strings
of text characters .
This is fundamental .
..
You invent images./icons to "define" actions
and commands .

They can be general , and you can chain them .
and CPU will execute the code .

Text causes to much mind flooding , you must read
and translate too much from your left brain
to the right brain , and you will lose ,
in that translation .

You can program with a mouse and
20 "softkeys" much faster than with a
IBM-101 keyboard !


--------------

BTW SDRAM has lower refresh power , so it can
be battery backed . New name is PSRAM ..
It will obsolete SRAM and DRAM ..

On 18 Jan 2007 22:46:11 -0800, "werty" <werty@swissinfo.org> wrote:

I thought you were the best programmer in the world? I guess I am
better because I _can_ do it faster with an IBM-101 keyboard.

The Real Andy wrote:
He is indeed, but we are talking about a different world ...

Roberto Waltman

[ Please reply to the group,
return address is invalid ]

Werty, what is your native language? I mean the one you speak,
not the one you use to program.

Dimiter

werty wrote:

werty wrote:
but I don't understand why mankind is not smart enough to create it.
(or are the real smart guys afraid to loose their job ;-)
There are a few weak attempts, like LabView, SGI, Orange,
but I haven't found any real implementation yet.

cheers,
Stef Mientki

Didi wrote:
he has to listen to his/her own sounds ;-)

Stef Mientki

The Real Andy wrote:



Is there some "purse" or prize ?

I can show you why new creations are supressed .

It helps to be rich and retired as i am ..

When i was younger , i invested $$ and thus
i had to predict if a market or product would
succeed , because if it failed , it took my investment
along with it ...

I now predict the total colapse of all industry
in America .

Because the govt can only get $$ from non-crony
business , General Motors and Ford and MacDonalds
dont pay any tax at all , because they are owned
by the govt , no govt taxes itself .

All the potential "producers" have given up and
gone to Europe , where they get a sweatheart
deal from UK ....zero tax ....

We are at the end of a 2000 year cycle , where we
can live a good life , without any "new" technology
only improvements on CPU's .... no need for
a 10ghz P4 .....
We need NO nukes , no faster , higher economy
cars , we need no new cheaper method to fly
to the moon or launch sat's nor build space
stations to live in .

This will devastate governments ,
They exist , only if they can
regulate competition to their benefit

Wide spread competition , but govt regulated is
the red flag , because once govts slip a bit ,
it's a fire storm , govts fighting gov'ts to
regain control ( taxation) of markets .

In 3 years , people lose jobs , consumption must fall ,
ruining world trade , Asia titens its belt and sells
ARM966 for $1.39 PSRAM 16MB for $1.75
ALI video MP-2 for $1.25
flooding the market ....
,
This will make it easy for programmers to
write some free s/w and no one will use Linux .

We will take computers for granted !!

As i said , technology cost will hit bottom
at same time people will not be able
to buy it !! Only the rich .
Govts can get power by buying the poor vote ,
but with no more poor ?
Govt will lose power to get $$ to buy the votes .

USA lost power in 1930 and engineers
were less enslaved , thus built the DC-3 .

Ford crony would not build a good airplane
so when govt lost power ..Americans
produced ...
Similar in WW II , Boeing the worlds worst ,
built a B-17 , but our govt was short of $$ ,
had to pay General Dynamics ( ConVair)
to build the B-24 .

GD ( Convair ) refused to join the team to 2nd source
the b-17 , cause it was just a crony govt designed
airplane ... junk , death trap , a pig ..

The loss of govt power will slide fast ,
reducing the worlds pop in only one generation !

2010 unemployment
2018 USA dives bad ...

On Fri, 19 Jan 2007 19:19:17 +0100, Stef Mientki
<S.Mientki-nospam@mailbox.kun.nl> wrote:

RF amp, gain and Vswr, on an HP network analyzer about as quick as it
takes to wtite this. ( I also do C++ the hard way, typing)

On 18 Jan 2007 22:46:11 -0800, "werty" <werty@swissinfo.org> wrote:

Sounds brilliant. Show us some code.

John

On 19 Jan 2007 14:11:12 -0800, "werty" <werty@swissinfo.org> wrote:

There is indeed, i win the prize, cause I have just proved that I am
better than you.

sdeyoreo@hotmail.com wrote:
LabView, a program that takes more than 4 hours !! to install,
rewriting 10 lines of Delphi code,
changes into about 15 full computer screens !!
than I definitely call this bullshit,
certainly if you need real flexibility !!
I've compared about 10 packages the last few months,
and here you can see my preliminary conclusion
http://oase.uci.kun.nl/~mientki/pic/conclusion2.html
btw, I yesterday found another promising one Viper.

cheers,
Stef Mientki

"John Larkin" <jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote in message
news:up53r2pq8ujhi95oh5p628hvcm7haa4p7h@4ax.com...
Jack Peacock

In article <1169189171.761096.264830@m58g2000cwm.googlegroups .com>,
werty <werty@swissinfo.org> writes
Which is why many use UML and other graphical CASE tools.

Why is yours so much better and who supports it?




--
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
\/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills Staffs England /\/\/\/\/
/\/\/ chris@phaedsys.org www.phaedsys.org \/\/\
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/

"werty" <werty@swissinfo.org> writes:

U r 3733t, d00d! Respec!

Chris
--
Chris Eilbeck

In article <1169189171.761096.264830@m58g2000cwm.googlegroups .com>, "werty" <werty@swissinfo.org> wrote:
http://www.pioneernet.net/curtis/ima...le_e/wiley.gif