- attaching a second router down the line...
- Posted by Gordon J. Rattray on February 19th, 2006
Hi there,
I have my main Linksys router going to the public internet side, gateway
192.168.1.1, and leading from that router internally is another SMC router
with 192.168.2.1 as it's gateway. On my Windows XP machine which is directly
attached to the Linksys router, how can I enable my machine to ping the SMC
192.168.2.1 router?
Thanks,
Gordon
- Posted by Richard G. Harper on February 19th, 2006
Turn off the routing functions of the second router - make it a switch only.
--
Richard G. Harper [MVP Shell/User] rgharper@gmail.com
* PLEASE post all messages and replies in the newsgroups
* for the benefit of all. Private mail is usually not replied to.
* My website, such as it is ... http://rgharper.mvps.org/
* HELP us help YOU ... http://www.dts-l.org/goodpost.htm
"Gordon J. Rattray" <gords@shaw.ca> wrote in message
news:Ou7OfVZNGHA.2628@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
- Posted by Kurt on February 20th, 2006
You can do this:
Internet
|
Public IP
ROUTER 1
192.168.1.1
|
192.168.1.2
ROUTER 2
192.168.2.1
|
COMPUTER : 192.168.2.2
255.255.255.0
192.168.2.1
You should be able to ping anything in the path.
You can NOT do this:
Internet
|
Public IP
ROUTER 1
192.168.1.1
|
COMPUTER : 192.168.1.2
255.255.255.0
192.168.1.1
|
192.168.2.1 (LAN Side Connected to your network)
ROUTER 2
Because router 2 is on a different subnet. Even if you connect the WAN side
to your network, you cannot ping backwards through the NAT.
....kurt
"Gordon J. Rattray" <gords@shaw.ca> wrote in message
news:Ou7OfVZNGHA.2628@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
- Posted by Ace Fekay [MVP] on February 20th, 2006
In news:11vijccepquvqf5@corp.supernews.com,
Kurt <lorentzenkurt@nospam.hotmail.com> stated, which I commented on below:
You could if you put in a static route on Router 1 describing how to get to
192.168.2.0/24 as long as Router 2 is set to route and is not a NAT.
--
Ace
This posting is provided "AS-IS" with no warranties or guarantees and
confers no rights.
Having difficulty reading or finding responses to your post?
Instead of the website you're using, I suggest to use OEx (Outlook Express
or any other newsreader), and configure a news account, pointing to
news.microsoft.com. This is a direct link to the Microsoft Public
Newsgroups. It is FREE and requires NO ISP's Usenet account. OEx allows you
to easily find, track threads, cross-post, sort by date, poster's name,
watched threads or subject.
Not sure how? It's easy:
How to Configure OEx for Internet News
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=171164
Ace Fekay, MCSE 2003 & 2000, MCSA 2003 & 2000, MCSE+I, MCT, MVP
Microsoft MVP - Windows Server Directory Services
Microsoft Certified Trainer
Assimilation Imminent. Resistance is Futile.
Infinite Diversities in Infinite Combinations.
The only thing in life is change. Anything more is a blackhole consuming
unnecessary energy.
===========================
- Posted by Kurt on February 20th, 2006
Yes, Ace makes a good point. I am assuming garden variety SOHO routers, most
of which cannot be straight (non-NAT) routers. Assuming is always a mistake,
of course. In the case pointed out by Ace, the Interface on the near side of
Router 2 would be in the same subnet as the computer and the Router 1, and
the 192.168.2 network would be on the far side. You would need routes
between networks at the appropriate places depending on how your network is
set up.
.....kurt
"Ace Fekay [MVP]"
<PleaseSubstituteMyActualFirstName&LastNameHere@ho tmail.com> wrote in
message news:OrQCbOeNGHA.3988@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
- Posted by Ace Fekay [MVP] on February 20th, 2006
In news:11vjnc4bue9jbdd@corp.supernews.com,
Kurt <lorentzenkurt@nospam.hotmail.com> stated, which I commented on below:
Thanks for the plug Kurt. I think it would be cleaner that way. :-)
Gordon, for a visual of what this should look like, or just to get an idea
of what it should look like with the routing entries, check out my routing
example:
http://fekay.com/SupportBlogs/StaticRouteExample.htm
Ace