Tech Support > Microsoft Windows > Creating exact bootable clone of my PC's System Drive
Creating exact bootable clone of my PC's System Drive
Posted by mfrank01 on March 7th, 2006


Hi,

I have a firewire 80 GB external drive split into 2 partitions. One
is ~50GB and the other is ~30 GB. My studio PC has 2 hard drives, C:
for the system and D: for audio. Both are 40GB drives. Since I've
only used 25GB of the 40GB of the system drive (C, is it possible
to create a bootable clone of C: onto the ~30 GB partition of the
external firewire drive? In other words, does the original and clone
drive need to be the same size?

I've recently experienced a system crash on my studio computer. I
managed to get it working again, but I fear my hard drive is failing.
Also, what is the best, most reliable, but more importantly, easiest
cloning software out there? I know someone who uses PCbeginner and
likes it, but I've seen others recommended on this forum.

Thanks for your help,

Frank

Posted by Kerry Brown on March 7th, 2006


mfrank01 wrote:
You shold create an image which can be used to create a bootable clone. You
can clone an internal drive to an external drive but it sometimes doesn't
make a bootable drive. With clones for the most part the target has to be
the same size or larger than the source. With images only the data is stored
and it can be compressed. An image is like instructions on how to create a
clone. Images are usually smaller than the original.

I use Acronis True Image. Norton Ghost is another very popular program.
There are many more. Bootitng is often mentioned on this newsgroup. I have
not used it persoanlly so can't recommend it.

http://www.acronis.com/homecomputing...cts/trueimage/

http://www.symantec.com/home_homeoff...t10/index.html

http://www.terabyteunlimited.com/bootitng.html

Kerry



Posted by ms on March 8th, 2006



"Kerry Brown" <kerry@kdbNOSPAMsys-tems.c*a*m> wrote in message
news:uWdZMOjQGHA.5116@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
Heard good things about Acronis, but I have only used Ghost version 9. Very
easy to use, will span DVDs, or backup to network drives or external
enclosures. Backup is performed from within Windows, so you can still use
your PC, and boot from install disk to restore image.

HTH



Posted by Mike Fields on March 8th, 2006



"Kerry Brown" <kerry@kdbNOSPAMsys-tems.c*a*m> wrote in message
news:uWdZMOjQGHA.5116@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
I gave up on Acronis True image -- I have both the latest (last)
release of version 8 as well as paying for the upgrade to version
9 a while back. Kept running into the same issues others were
reporting in their support forums. Gave up and switched to
BING (bootit NG ) from terabyte
http://www.terabyteunlimited.com/bootitng.html
They actually have 3 flavors BING which can save/restore
and do partitioning stuff, Image For Dos that you can create
a bootable CD to run from (so you don't have to have
any other support in place) and Image for Windows that
can be run from windows. All three generate image files
the other versions can read. It is a little geeky, but
very reasonably priced, good support and has consistently
performed as advertised for me. You can get all 3 of
their utilities for $49.54 at
http://www.terabyteinc.com/purchimgw.html They also
have trial versions you can try.

mikey


Posted by Anna on March 8th, 2006




"Kerry Brown" <kerry@kdbNOSPAMsys-tems.c*a*m> wrote in message
news:uWdZMOjQGHA.5116@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...

Frank:
In addition to Kerry's suggestions and those you've received from other
responders to your query, let me add mine...

While the Acronis True Image program is a fine disk imaging program, it does
not have the capability, insofar as I'm aware, of *directly* cloning the
contents of one's HD to an *individual* partition on another HD. It's an
"all-or-nothing" proposition in that while you can directly clone the
contents of your system drive to your Firewire EHD, the resultant clone
would end up as a single partition on that drive containing the cloned
contents of your system drive, however, your second partition on the
external drive including all its former contents would be gone. At least
that's what we've experienced with the ATI version 8 program. There is a
newer version 9 but we've no experience with that version. If that
capability now exists re directly cloning individual partitions, perhaps
Kerry will so indicate.

You may wish to consider the program we generally use for disk-to-disk
cloning operations - Symantec's Norton Ghost 2003 program. It's been
presumably superseded by the Norton Ghost v 9 and Ghost v 10 programs, but
we find the 2003 program a more simpler and straightforward program to use
for the *direct* cloning of one HD (or partition) to another HD (or
partition) than its successor programs. And we prefer to use the Ghost 2003
program with a Ghost bootable floppy disk (or Ghost bootable CD). This
program has the capability of cloning individual partitions. But please note
that your Firewire EHD will *not* be bootable even though it will contain
the cloned contents of your system drive, however, its contents can be
re:cloned to an internal HD for restoration purposes should that need arise.
And in that case the internal drive will be bootable. (I suppose I should
mention that there have been reports from some users that they have been
able to boot from an USB/Firewire EHD containing the cloned contents of the
XP OS but we've never been able to do so or confirm that it can be done).

There are, of course, a number of other disk imaging programs on the market
and you should be hearing about them from other responders to your query.

If you (or others) are interested in the possibility of using the Ghost 2003
program, please so indicate and I'll provide further details re the program
together with step-by-step instructions for using it.
Anna






Posted by Kerry Brown on March 8th, 2006


Anna wrote:
I'm using TI 8 and it does work as you say. I prefer images for backups and
only use the clone tool when replacing a drive. Images take up far less room
and you can store more images. I have tried Ghost and it is the same in that
images take up less room. Both have advantages and disadvantages. I prefer
TI simply because I have more experience with it and know it better.

Kerry




Posted by Timothy Daniels on March 8th, 2006


"mfrank01" wrote:

No.



The easiest for *cloning* (and cloning only) that I've
found is Casper XP by Future Systems Solutions. It
will clone a single partition to unallocated space or to
another single existing partition. It will also clone an
entire hard drive to another. The MBR will be copied
automatically, and the destination partition for a single
partition clone will be marked "active" for you. You can
download a trial copy from
www.FSSdev.com/products/casperxp/ .

Although you can transfer a clone to an external USB
hard drive, you won't be able to boot from it unless you
have one of the still rare BIOSes that can boot from a
USB drive. The clone will probably be of use only as
an archive copy - in effect an uncompressed image.

If you have yet to buy the external drive, consider putting
a SATA drive in an external box and using it as if it were
an internal SATA drive. Kingwin and Athena are makers
of such boxes:
http://www.kingwin.com/pdut_Cat.asp?CateID=52
http://www.athenapower.com , product nos. MR-899SATA
and MR-899SATAB. These external boxes have their
own cooling fan and a wall wart power supply, so the HDs
think that they're inside a PC case, and they can boot
just like an internal drive because they're connected to
a normal IDE controller inside the case.

As with all clones, when booting it for the 1st time,
don't let is see its "parent" OS. Leave the drive with the
"parent" disconnected until after that 1st boot. Thereafter,
the clone can see its "parent" OS when it boots up with
no problem.

*TimDaniels*


Posted by Anna on March 8th, 2006



"Kerry Brown" <kerry@kdbNOSPAMsys-tems.c*a*m> wrote in message
news:O0A$F9mQGHA.4900@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...

Kerry:
I agree that the Acronis True Image program (at least the one we've worked
with - version 8) is a fine program based on our limited experience with
that program. We use these disk imaging programs (primarily the Ghost 2003
program as I've previously mentioned) virtually exclusively for a single
task - cloning the contents of one HD to another HD. In our case we are
uninterested in creating compressed images that can be stored on removable
media, i.e., DVDs or on a HD. Our sole interest is basic disk-to-disk
cloning to establish & maintain a comprehensive backup system that users
find reasonably simple to employ on a routine basis, not terribly
time-consuming to undertake, and most important of all, a process that is
truly effective as a day-in day-out backup system.

A note to Frank, the OP, if he's still with us...
You raised the question as to whether the source partition and the
destination partition must be the same size for the cloning operation to
succeed. The answer is "no". In your case your source drive is 40 GB, but
contains only 25 GB of data. So you could clone the contents of that drive
to your 30 GB partition on your external HD. The only requirement is that
the destination partition be sufficiently large enough to receive the cloned
contents of the source drive (partition). Again, I'm referring here to the
Ghost 2003 program. Other disk imaging (cloning) programs might treat this
differently.
Anna



Posted by Kerry Brown on March 8th, 2006


Anna wrote:
Anna

You have system that works for you. I prefer a different system. With images
you can create different backups for different days and thus have multiple
copies of backups. With TI you can mount an image and copy files from the
image. This allows you to do partial restores much like copying files from a
cloned drive. I have seen situations where you sometimes have to go back in
time until you find a backup that doesn't have corrupted files. For example
you may have an accounting program where the data became corrupted while
doing the last payroll (2 weeks ago) but no one noticed until entering the
current payroll. If you only have last night's backup that doesn't help
much. I usually store a weeks worth of backups (images) and then pick one
day a week to keep the last month's worth of backups. The structure would
look like this. Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, Friday1,
Friday2, Friday3. This would allow you to go back a month if needed. Once a
week backups are also burned to CD/DVD and stored offsite so if you really
have to you could go back as far as needed. This can all be automated except
the once a week to CD/DVD. I set this up for Monday morning. Someone is
delegated to burn Friday's image. I have not found a way to do this with
clones instead of images without having multiple partitions to hold each
clone.

Kerry



Posted by Anna on March 8th, 2006





Yes, I have no problem with your system if that's the one that works for
you. In our own case, we found over the years with our customers (small to
medium size businesses and home users) that the most effective backup system
they could employ was creating disk-to-disk clones. The simplicity &
effectiveness of that process was quite appealing and we found it was a
process that generally would be adhered to in a routine & systematic way.
Unlike other backup programs that we tried and discarded. And that included
creating disk images on removable media, incremental backups, and the like.
For a variety of reasons, they just didn't work (at least for our customers)
over the long haul.

To that end, we've encouraged many of our customers to equip their desktop
computers with removable hard drives. By so doing they would have at hand as
many hard drives as necessary to maintain multiple generations of backups in
accordance with their needs. Over the years (about six) virtually all our
customers have expressed satisfaction with this process.
Anna




Similar Posts