Tech Support > Microsoft Windows > microsoft newsgroup response time
microsoft newsgroup response time
Posted by Louis Rost on March 10th, 2006


Microsoft newsgroup response has become extremely slow over the past
month or so. Response times while surfing the net or downloading
email are rather good. Seems to indicate a problem with Microsoft
news groups.

Are any of you experiencing the same phenomenon?

Thanks, Lou

Posted by Alias on March 10th, 2006


Louis Rost wrote:
No.

Alias

--
Use the "Reply to Sender" feature of your news reader program to email me.
Utiliza "Responder al Remitente" para enviarme un mail.

Posted by Mike Williams on March 10th, 2006


Louis Rost wrote:
No. Are you reading it directly from the Microsoft news server via a
newsreader like OE or Thunderbird, or second-hand or with a web interface?

Posted by Louis Rost on March 10th, 2006


On Fri, 10 Mar 2006 18:41:45 +0100, Mike Williams
<mikew@m-v-p-s.org.null> wrote:

Using Forte Agent.

Lou

Posted by Kerry Brown on March 10th, 2006


Louis Rost wrote:
Some ISPs are implementing QOS on their networks and giving newsgroup
packets (and other services) lesser priority so that they can offer good
VOIP service. In other words even if you are accessing msnews direct your
ISP may be slowing you down.

Kerry



Posted by antioch on March 10th, 2006


Not on a regular basis. Newsgroup access can be slow at times - the most
annoying thing is the dalay in posting, despite loading of messages and I.E.
working normal. 4 hours is my longest.
I blame my ISP.
Rgds
Antioch

"Louis Rost" <123fourATbishopDOTcom@> wrote in message
newsdd312d47b23u5t2iurmbvlf6rrl6dnqim@4ax.com...


Posted by NoStop on March 10th, 2006


On Friday 10 March 2006 09:25 am, Louis Rost had this to say in
microsoft.public.windowsxp.general:

Complain to your ISP. They are throttling down access speed to their news
server. ISP's don't like UseNet. It costs them money and few of their
subscribers even know it exists. Some have dropped UseNet altogether while
others are making access so unbearably slow, users are forced to go to paid
newsgroup services. COMPLAIN, COMPLAIN, COMPLAIN! And get other subscribers
to your ISP to do likewise. That's your only solution short of purchasing
access elsewhere.


--
From a Wintard helping another Wintard with his Windoze Problem:
"You might also want to try one of the numerous EXCELLENT
registry cleaners, and perhaps a ram washer."


Posted by Kerry Brown on March 10th, 2006


NoStop wrote:

With QOS they can prioritise packets based on the packet content. This can
slow down Usenet service even if you use a paid server. Most ISPs are
offering some form of VOIP and some are using QOS to give VOIP priority.
There is also some talk of ISPs using QOS to throttle back traffic to other
networks or service providors that don't pay them for priority.

Kerry




Posted by Louis Rost on March 10th, 2006


On Fri, 10 Mar 2006 09:49:09 -0800, "Kerry Brown"
<kerry@kdbNOSPAMsys-tems.c*a*m> wrote:

Kerry, thanks for reply. My ISP assures me QOS is not used to slow
down newsgroup traffic.

It may take 2+ minutes to retrieve 600 message headers from XP general
group. While that is occuring, I can retrieve email and surf the net
with good response times (cable connection).

I ran tracert to news.microsoft.com and got the following.

Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
(C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.

C:\Documents and Settings\Larry>tracert news.microsoft.com

Tracing route to msnews.microsoft.com [207.46.248.16]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 2 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.1.1
2 6 ms 6 ms 6 ms 209.223.146.1
3 26 ms 27 ms 47 ms s227831-1.uslsan3-bsn.savvis.net
[64.241.66.81]

4 44 ms 58 ms 52 ms bpr1-lay.cntx04.savvis.net
[209.223.166.149]
5 202 ms 76 ms 40 ms dcr1-ae0.LosAngeles.savvis.net
[208.172.44.5]
6 64 ms 35 ms 51 ms
dcr2-so-2-0-0.SanFranciscosfo.savvis.net [204.70
..192.90]
7 34 ms 35 ms 36 ms
dcr2-so-2-0-0.SanFranciscosfo.savvis.net [204.70
..192.90]
8 46 ms 51 ms 37 ms
dcr1-so-5-0-0.SanFranciscosfo.savvis.net [204.70
..192.149]
9 57 ms 52 ms 65 ms acr1-so-7-0-0.Seattle.savvis.net
[204.70.193.65]

10 55 ms 51 ms 51 ms
microsoft-hotmail-exodus.Seattle.savvis.net [208
..172.83.222]
11 60 ms 89 ms 64 ms pos3-0.iuskixcpxc1201.ntwk.msn.net
[207.46.36.15
0]
12 91 ms 65 ms 51 ms pos1-0.tke-12ix-1a.ntwk.msn.net
[207.46.155.1]
13 56 ms 50 ms * pos1-0.tke-12ix-1a.ntwk.msn.net
[207.46.155.1]
14 * * * Request timed out.
15 * * * Request timed out.

It seems the problem lies in the Microsoft network but I'm not at all
sure of that.

Do you have any more insight? If the problem does seem to be within
Microsoft network, how might I make that known to them?

Thanks for the help.

Lou

Posted by Kerry Brown on March 10th, 2006


Louis Rost wrote:
Mine won't admit it publicy either. I have talked to someone fairly high up
in their hierarchy who will only say "Yes, that's possible" and won't deny
that they are implementing QOS.

It's not unusual for trace route to die once it hits someone's internal
network. Run it several times during the day watching for changes. Run it
back to back several times as well. I don't experience the symptoms you
describe when accessing msnew.microsoft.com directly.

Kerry



Posted by Kerry Brown on March 10th, 2006


Forgot to mention in the last post that pathping is another useful utility
for doing connectivity troubleshooting.

Kerry


Posted by Doug on March 11th, 2006


NO everyting work good.
-
"Louis Rost" <123fourATbishopDOTcom@> wrote in message
newsdd312d47b23u5t2iurmbvlf6rrl6dnqim@4ax.com...

Posted by HeyBub on March 11th, 2006


Louis Rost wrote:
What happens when you use a genuine Microsoft product, such as Outlook,
instead of something vaguely French-sounding?



Posted by Breaker on March 11th, 2006


On Fri, 10 Mar 2006 11:18:50 -0800, Louis Rost
<123fourATbishopDOTcom@> wrote:


The only time I see this happen is if I dont delete the headers
currently downloaded before I download new headers. (This is in Agent)
If I delete the current headers showing in the list then download the
new headers they come down in seconds.

Posted by NoStop on March 11th, 2006


On Friday 10 March 2006 06:34 pm, HeyBub had this to say in
microsoft.public.windowsxp.general:

Why would you even suggest using such an inferior product as opposed to
Forte Agent? What would that have to do with access times on a news server?
Do you have a clue?


--
From a Wintard helping another Wintard with his Windoze Problem:
"You might also want to try one of the numerous EXCELLENT
registry cleaners, and perhaps a ram washer."


Posted by Bruce Chambers on March 11th, 2006


HeyBub wrote:

A. Microsoft Outlook has absolutely *NO* capability to read Usenet
newsgroups.

B. Forte Agent is a widely-known and well-respected news reader that
has been around for a lot longer than Outlook Express, Netscape, or
Thunderbird.

http://www.forteinc.com/main/who.php


--

Bruce Chambers

Help us help you:
http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. -Benjamin Franklin

Is life so dear or peace so sweet as to be purchased at the price of
chains and slavery? .... I know not what course others may take, but as
for me, give me liberty, or give me death! -Patrick Henry

Posted by Alias on March 11th, 2006


Bruce Chambers wrote:
Ah, but it does. It capably uses OE to read newsgroups.

I downloaded that once. Have the improved the interface yet?

Alias
--
Use the "Reply to Sender" feature of your news reader program to email me.
Utiliza "Responder al Remitente" para enviarme un mail.

Posted by Louis Rost on March 11th, 2006


On Fri, 10 Mar 2006 11:10:21 -0800, "Kerry Brown"
<kerry@kdbNOSPAMsys-tems.c*a*m> wrote:

Thanks Kerry and NoStop. After lengthy conversation with ISP, with
new found knowledge, I may have a solution. ISP insists it does not
throttle down usenet, however, have acknowledged they have a problem
with mis-configured DNS server. I was assured it will be fixed ASAP.

If the solution turns out to be anything other than the DNS, I will
post back to let you know the outcome FYI.

Lou

Posted by Kerry Brown on March 11th, 2006


Louis Rost wrote:
Sounds like plausible explanation. Let us know how it works out.

Kerry



Posted by Bruce Chambers on March 11th, 2006


Alias wrote:


That amusing part is that you don't even seem to realize that you've
just contradicted your self.


--

Bruce Chambers

Help us help you:
http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. -Benjamin Franklin

Is life so dear or peace so sweet as to be purchased at the price of
chains and slavery? .... I know not what course others may take, but as
for me, give me liberty, or give me death! -Patrick Henry


Similar Posts