Tech Support > Microsoft Windows > Network vs standalone licenses
Network vs standalone licenses
Posted by thalia132@yahoo.com on October 18th, 2005


Hi all,

I know the subject's been covered numerous times on this but I still
can't find my answer...

Are 10 Microsoft Network Licenses cheaper, more expensive, or the same
as 10 regular Microsoft licenses?

Posted by Danny Sanders on October 18th, 2005


> Are 10 Microsoft Network Licenses cheaper, more expensive, or the same
> as 10 regular Microsoft licenses?


What do you mean by "network licenses"?

What do you mean by regular licenses?


DDS
<thalia132@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1129669515.915491.324720@o13g2000cwo.googlegr oups.com...
> Hi all,
>
> I know the subject's been covered numerous times on this but I still
> can't find my answer...
>
> Are 10 Microsoft Network Licenses cheaper, more expensive, or the same
> as 10 regular Microsoft licenses?
>



Posted by Bruce Chambers on October 19th, 2005


thalia132@yahoo.com wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I know the subject's been covered numerous times on this but I still
> can't find my answer...
>
> Are 10 Microsoft Network Licenses cheaper, more expensive, or the same
> as 10 regular Microsoft licenses?
>



I'm afraid that the terms "Network Licenses" and "Regular Licenses" are
meaningless. Microsoft has no licensing scheme that uses these terms.
Perhaps you'll find an answer here:

Microsoft Licensing
http://www.microsoft.com/licensing/default.mspx


--

Bruce Chambers

Help us help you:
http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

You can have peace. Or you can have freedom. Don't ever count on having
both at once. - RAH

Posted by Peter Foldes on October 19th, 2005


Maybe you meant to say

Single License vs Volume License

--
Peter

Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.

<thalia132@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1129669515.915491.324720@o13g2000cwo.googlegr oups.com...
> Hi all,
>
> I know the subject's been covered numerous times on this but I still
> can't find my answer...
>
> Are 10 Microsoft Network Licenses cheaper, more expensive, or the same
> as 10 regular Microsoft licenses?
>

Posted by Yves Leclerc on October 19th, 2005


This original post appears to have been posted in the wrong newsgroup.
Microsoft does not have a networing license for XP.

"Bruce Chambers" <bchambers@cable0ne.n3t> wrote in message
news:%23F3cosE1FHA.560@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> thalia132@yahoo.com wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I know the subject's been covered numerous times on this but I still
>> can't find my answer...
>>
>> Are 10 Microsoft Network Licenses cheaper, more expensive, or the same
>> as 10 regular Microsoft licenses?
>>

>
>
> I'm afraid that the terms "Network Licenses" and "Regular Licenses" are
> meaningless. Microsoft has no licensing scheme that uses these terms.
> Perhaps you'll find an answer here:
>
> Microsoft Licensing
> http://www.microsoft.com/licensing/default.mspx
>
>
> --
>
> Bruce Chambers
>
> Help us help you:
> http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm
> http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
>
> You can have peace. Or you can have freedom. Don't ever count on having
> both at once. - RAH