Leythos wrote:

You seek out my posts.

"ROFL! Try not responding to me for a month and see how much I won't
miss you!" -
http://groups.google.com/group/micro...2f7b0dadfad086

Which you did, but you were the one that broke the silence.

"I rather enjoyed the silence! Oh well, 'All good things . . . .'" -
http://groups.google.com/group/micro...3ab536198fd24f

I can only show my reply to yours that broke the silence, as you are too
ashamed of your posts to let them be archived.

You are at times inhuman. That would be reason enough to consider you
to be alien.

No you weren't. The topic of this thread is the mistake I made, calling
2 out of 3 posts censored by MS, when only one of them was actually
censored, which I didn't really need to expose, since no one seemed to
notice it, but I felt honor-bound to expose myself, as I'm not afraid of
the truth, even if the truth is that I was wrong. You can't learn from
your mistake unless you are first willing to admit that you made a
mistake.

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity/index.php?showtopic=3
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"

Michael Stevens wrote:
Now you're feeding the troll.

Kerry

But Microsoft has the ability to refuse activition when they deem it
necessary. You or I cannot reach everyone to tell thm they have options. It
is pretty sad how MS marketing got their way by alowing the wording that
your version has been activated to many times was allowed with the revision
of XP SP 1 and 2. Maybe it couldn't be changed, but I doubt it.

--
Michael Stevens MS-MVP XP
xpnews@bogusmichaelstevenstech.com
http://www.michaelstevenstech.com
For a better newsgroup experience. Setup a newsreader.
http://www.michaelstevenstech.com/ou...snewreader.htm

"kurttrail" <dontemailme@anywhereintheknownuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:%23YjW4FsQGHA.3872@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...

Kerry Brown wrote:

ROFL! It's kinda like all arguments on the USENET end up with something
or someone getting compared to the Nazis. In the 21st Century, the
Nazis are the Bush Administration! ;-)

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity/index.php?showtopic=3
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"

kurttrail wrote:

I think you'll like this one Kurt:

http://carcino.gen.nz/images/index.p...9a680/463c5922



Steve N.

Well I would be proud to feed this troll, but kurt is not a troll. Get a
grip on what Kurt says and then tell me what he actually is wrong about. I
don't agree with all his statemeants, but I am curious what you find wrong
with his statements.

--
Michael Stevens MS-MVP XP
xpnews@bogusmichaelstevenstech.com
http://www.michaelstevenstech.com
For a better newsgroup experience. Setup a newsreader.
http://www.michaelstevenstech.com/ou...snewreader.htm

"Kerry Brown" <kerry@kdbNOSPAMsys-tems.c*a*m> wrote in message
news:eGj7N9sQGHA.5900@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...

Michael Stevens wrote:

In a way, he is right. My point was that words aren't offensive,
actions are. But the effect of the post generated discussion on another
topic entirely.


--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity/index.php?showtopic=3
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"

Leythos wrote:

Typical troll response. Throw away a whole post, to answer one
meaningless line.

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity/index.php?showtopic=3
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"

Steve N. wrote:

Oh sh*t! Too Funny!

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity/index.php?showtopic=3
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"

Michael Stevens wrote:
I'm not disagreeing with your sentiments. I actually agree with Kurt, it's a
tragedy for both sides. I'm saying in the context of this thread that was
troll post. It was off topic and calculated to generate responses.

Kerry

Yes, it did and for one I am passionate about. Bush is an idiot and a
crook, and because he is an idiot, I believe it will come out he stole the
election with help from his brother Jeb both years of his administration and
they will both be prosecuted and should serve time in prison. But neither
will probably get their just punishiment

--
Michael Stevens MS-MVP XP
xpnews@bogusmichaelstevenstech.com
http://www.michaelstevenstech.com
For a better newsgroup experience. Setup a newsreader.
http://www.michaelstevenstech.com/ou...snewreader.htm

"kurttrail" <dontemailme@anywhereintheknownuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:%23ye6iHtQGHA.6008@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...

ROTFL

Kerry

Leythos wrote:

You really are a dumb schmuck. He was expressing his opinion.

Just because someone expresses an opinion contrary to yours does not
make them a troll.

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity/index.php?showtopic=3
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"

Leythos wrote:

So anybody that posts anything you don't like is automatically a troll
now? Transparent _and_ pathetic.

Steve N.

kurttrail wrote:

If he keeps it up like this the only one he won't consider a troll is
himself.

Steve N.

Kerry Brown wrote:

Glad you enjoyed it.

)

Steve N.

kurttrail wrote:

I knew you'd like it.

Steve N.

Leythos wrote:

Including this of yours?

You certainly are intelligent enough to realize that if you go around
calling people trolls it is in effect trolling, aren't you?

You _know_ it will elicit response, and most likely confrontational.

Now I ask again (rhetorically), what is trolling again?

Oh wait! You were expressing your opinion. LOL!

(Does anyone want to start a poll on whether he'll ever get it or not?)

Steve N.

Leythos wrote:

Pot calling Kettle Black, come in Kettle, over...

I asked a rhetorical question. You snipped the rest, so OK, let's focus
on what you replied to...

What is a rhetorical question? One that requires nor desires an answer,
rather intended to elicit thought and relection on the subject, often in
an ironic manner. You chose to reply and once again called me a troll.
My intention is not to elicit a confrontational response from you,
rather an effort to get you to think.

I don't give much of a rip about some "official" definition of a troll,
I am concerned that you are here, calling people trolls, telling us your
definition of what a troll is, all the while giving us a fantastic
example of what one is one by your own definition.

I bet you'll once again snip all the salient points I make and re-define
what you call a "troll". Go ahead. It's no skin off my nose. I know who
and what I am no matter what you or anyone else thinks or says, and I
ain't no troll, Buckwheat.

I think you need to learn the difference between trolling and engaging
in a discussion. Sorry that you don't like what some folks' opinions are
here or that some folks are somewhat colorful and even rude (usually
intended in a humorous manner, as far as I've observerd), but that's
just the way it is in usenet. You know that. It does not constitute
"trolling".

That's my opinion. Don't like it? Too bad. I'm no troll and stop calling
me one. If you think I am a troll then you are a troll, too, by your own
definition.

:P~

Steve N.

That is very bad taste - I can see no decent reason for that picture being
put into this newsgroup.
"Steve N." <me@here.now> wrote in message
news:x1EPf.3990$6I.3744@newsread3.news.pas.earthli nk.net...