Tech Support > Computer Hardware > Modems > Charter hijacks browser
Charter hijacks browser
Posted by CSharpner on April 28th, 2007


This may have negative ramifications for Charter as news of this
unethical activity gets out:

As of yesterday (as best I can determine), Charter.net cable internet
services is now hijacking bad DNS queries. In other words, if you
mistype a domain name and end up typing one that doesn't exist,
normally you'd get an error message. Your own browser has settings
where you can choose to be redirected to a search page of your choice,
or none at all, if that is your choice.

Charter took that choice away. Now, all bad queries go to here:

http://ww11.charter.net/search

It doesn't matter what your browser settings are. This is because
your browser depends on an error code coming back from the Domain Name
Servers (DNS), at which point your browser would either display an
error message or redirect you to your chosen search page. Now, since
Charter's DNS servers never return errors and instead respond with
Charter's search page, your browser never receives the proper error
code and therefore has no trigger to take you to your chosen search
page.

This presents further problems as many software applications (off the
shelf and custom, and enterprise software) depend on the internet
working the same everywhere. Many applications depend on this error
code. They will all fail to work as designed because Charter wants to
make advertising revenue.

This unethical activity was attempted by Verisign back in 2003 (but in
their case, it effected the ENTIRE internet, not just customers of a
single ISP). You can get more information on the Verisign fiasco here
for context:

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...ijacks+browser

Posted by $Bill on April 28th, 2007


CSharpner wrote:

Have you tried using another open DNS server ? Does that solve the problem ?


Posted by CSharpner on April 28th, 2007


On Apr 27, 11:31 pm, "$Bill" <n...@SPAMOLAtodbe.com> wrote:
Yes, and it does.

Primary 4.2.2.2
Secondary 4.2.2.3


Posted by JHG on April 28th, 2007


Did read the "about this page" page? You can Opt-Out and get the expected
error code. i.e. 404

"CSharpner" <csharpner@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1177740745.359944.266150@y5g2000hsa.googlegro ups.com...


Posted by Warren H on April 28th, 2007


JHG wrote:

Yes, but that requires a cookie. Browsers use cookies, but not all
software that depend on DNS use cookies.

It should work according to expected standards by default. Other ways of
things working should be opt-in, not opt-out, especially if the opt-out
doesn't do the job it's supposed to.



Posted by Agent_C on April 28th, 2007


On 27 Apr 2007 20:01:00 -0700, CSharpner <csharpner@gmail.com> wrote:


This isn't exactly a grievous crime. There's a simple opt-out:

http://ww11.charter.net/options

Posted by CSharpner on April 28th, 2007


On Apr 28, 7:47 am, Agent_C <Agent-C-hates-s...@nyc.rr.com> wrote:
Their opt out is a farce on many levels and is NOT simple:

1. It's temporary (60 or 90 days, then you're forced back in).
2. It installs a cookie for your browser (I shouldn't have to install
something to NOT get a service).
3. You must install the stupid cookie on every browser you use (I
currently use both IE and FireFox).
4. You must install it on each browser on each computer (I have two
computers, two browsers each, so I'd have to "opt-out" 4 times.
5. I'd have to opt out a minimum of 16 times a year (if it expires
after 90 days) up to 24 times a year (if it expires in 60 days).
6. Additionally, I'd have to "opt-out" again for each virtual machine
I use (I use many, because I'm a software developer).
7. Each time I use the snapshot feature in my VMs, I'd have to opt-
out again for each browser in my VM.
8. Any time I have to reinstall Windows, I'd have to re-"opt-out" on
both browsers.
9. Any time settngs get messed up, I'd have to re-opt-out.
10. A common security practice is to delete your cookies, which I do
often in IE, which requires yet another op-out.
11. In FireFox, one of my favorite and most used features is to
accept cookies only for the current session, at which point they'll be
deleted when the session ends. Can't do that anymore or I'd have to
opt-out every time I browse... not feasible.
12. They never asked me if I wanted to "opt-in".
13. They never informed me that they were doing this.
14. Other internet enabled software (All other software that is NOT a
browser) that doesn't use cookies, cannot "opt-out".
15. They should NOT be changing the default behavior of the Internet.

There is a simple solution to this: They should just stop hijacking.
IE7 and FireFox both have the ability to set a default search page.
IF WE WANTED CHARTER AS OUR DEFAULT, WE'D SET IT OURSELVES!!!! What
they've done is overridden what we've ALREADY CHOSEN! If I wrote
software that did this to your machine, without asking, you'd call it
"browser hijacking", "adware", and "malware". If I got caught, I'd
likely go to jail. Why should it be any different for Charter??

As you can see, it's a lot more complicated and a lot more cumbersome
than a "simple opt-out".


Posted by Warren H on April 28th, 2007


CSharpner wrote:
I'd bet good money (as opposed to that stuff I normally use) that the
terms of service are worded in a way that allows them to do this. But
just because they can, doesn't mean they should.

As you've said, not all software that requires DNS resolution uses
cookies. Getting a webpage that wasn't requested instead of the correct
information or an error essentially breaks that software.

Ideally, if they really have their hearts set on doing this, it should
be an opt-in, not an opt-out. But if they just don't have enough respect
for their customers to make it opt-in, then they should have an opt-out
process that is both permanent, and works for all Internet-enabled
software, not just cookie-enabled browsers.

As implemented, it very squarely falls into the category of things they
can do, but shouldn't do.

--
Warren H.

==========
Disclaimer: My views reflect those of myself, and not my
employer, my friends, nor (as she often tells me) my wife.
Any resemblance to the views of anybody living or dead is
coincidental. No animals were hurt in the writing of this
response -- unless you count my dog who desperately wants
to go outside now.

Maintain your landscape with Black & Decker:
http://www.holzemville.com/mall/blackanddecker




Posted by CSharpner on May 4th, 2007


On Apr 28, 4:40 pm, "Warren H" <whol...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Yep. Correct on all points (though, I haven't checked the agreement,
but I'm sure it probably states something like that). Since I've
posted that, a new high speed internet company has come to town which
will be providing fiber to the door. I'll be able to get 15mb/s (as
opposed to Charter's 3mb... well, OK, charter JUST NOW upped to 4mb)
for the same price (or less) than I'm paying charter. I'll also be
able to dump Charter for my cable TV as well as this company will be
offering HDTV as well. Unbelievably good timing!! I'll be sure to
let charter know why I'm dumping them. Up until now, I haven't had a
choice.


Posted by Agent_C on May 4th, 2007


On 4 May 2007 09:46:52 -0700, CSharpner <csharpner@gmail.com> wrote:

I sure hope FIOS is the panacea everybody seems to think it is/will
be.

Fiber to the home may have dramatically greater bandwidth, but it
doesn't make Verizon immune from service outages, connectivity
problems, network latency and sub par support.

I recall what a complete disaster DSL was when they first started to
roll it out; and to this day, their network slows down at peak hours
in ways my Roadrunner connection never has.

I'm staying tuned...

A_C

Posted by $Bill on May 5th, 2007


CSharpner wrote:
What outfit is that so I can check their website out and see where
else they're going ?

Posted by clifto on May 5th, 2007


CSharpner wrote:
Must be nice. Where are you?

--
Postulate a God who's so smart He designed things we won't discover for the
next ten years, but who's so incredibly stupid He couldn't think up the
theory of evolution. Duhhhhhhhh. "Damn, Darwin, what a great idea!"

Posted by CSharpner on May 6th, 2007


On May 4, 9:21 pm, "$Bill" <n...@SPAMOLAtodbe.com> wrote:
It's TDS.
www.TdsTelecom.com

They haven't rolled the fiber in my neighborhood yet. If anyone else
gets this service, let us know:

1. Does it live up to the download speed claims of 15mb/s?
2. Does it live up to the upload speed claims of 2mb/s?
3. Do they do the unethical browser hijacking too??
4. Reliability?
5. Hardware -- What do you get? Do you have to pay monthly for the
HW? How much?
6. Do you use any VOIP phone service (like Lingo.com or Vonage.com)?
Does it work?
7. Did you get the TV combo? Is the video quality any good? Are all
channels digital?
8. If you got the TV combo, what about hardware? What'd you get and
how much do you pay monthly for the hardware (not counting the service
price itself).

For the record, their phone service (which is VOIP, as I understand
it) is way more expensive than either Lingo.com or Vonage.com. I'll
be sticking with Lingo.com and ditch TDS's phone service.

If I'm the first one here to get this, I'll report back on all of
these. I just don't know when they'll be rolling out fiber in my
neighborhood. I'll be their first customer when they do (assuming no
one here has really bad stuff to report about them).


Posted by CSharpner on May 6th, 2007


On May 5, 2:10 pm, clifto <cli...@gmail.com> wrote:
Knoxville, TN.


Posted by $Bill on May 7th, 2007


CSharpner wrote:
Not here yet. Looks like a DSL and Satellite setup. Couldn't find any
reference to fiber on their site.

From their FAQ:

What Speed Packages are available with TDS Wireless?

TDS currently provides Wireless to both residential and business customers
in 1 and 2 year contracts ranging from 384k to 4MB.
For Pricing and Package information, Please contact our Sales Department at
1-877-METROCOM or 1-877-638-7626. You can also get more information at
www.tdsmetro.net

4MB would normally be 4 MegaBytes, but I doubt that was their intent.
I assume they meant 4 Mb - 4 Megabits. Let us know if you can find any
reference to fiber for these guys.

They show a 3 Mb service for $20/mo for 6 mo. Looks like it goes to $50
after the trial period.


Posted by $Bill on May 7th, 2007


$Bill wrote:
OK, found a couple of other links on the subject:

http://wistechnology.com/article.php?id=2542

TDS Metrocom has launched a pilot program for one Fitchburg neighborhood,
offering broadband Internet speeds of as high as 10 megabits per second—
several times higher than the fastest cable and DSL packages currently
available—in order to gauge customer usage and potential applications of
an emerging technology. ...

The service is being offered to about 1,100 homes in the McKee Road area,
offering download speeds of one, four and 10 mbps at $20, $30, and $45 per
month, respectively. The service is also being offered with phone service
over the same fiber cable for an additional $44. ...



Basic wiring setup for TDS fiber to home:
http://www.primespots.com/butler1_pd...ers_wiring.pdf


Similar Posts