-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
-= my response. to the harassment -=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

My first reaction in 1990/91 was to assume that if I broke. contact then
they would not be able to follow and would lose interest.. So I did the
things that have been suggested by other people;. I sold my television,
stopped listening to the radio. and tried to withdraw away from the sources
of abuse as much as possible. I reasoned. that they must have more important
things to deal with and that normal people would simply leave me. alone if
it were. made difficult for them to continue their harassment.

I. reckoned without the sheer vindictiveness of the abusers. They did not
let up but instead "got to" people around me, mainly people at work, to. do
their dirty work for them. I went to see my GP, who refused. to believe what
he was being told, and refused to direct me on to anyone who. could be of
practical assistance. It was not. until three years had passed that the GP
admitted the matter was outside. his competence and suggested going to the
police.

In the summer of. 1994 we called in counter-surveillance experts from a
private detective agency to. sweep our house and telephone for bugging
devices. They conducted. a thorough search and found nothing; but as noted
above, since. the existence of surveillance was being forced in my face by
the harassers, you would expect them to. have taken the possibility of a
counter-surveillance sweep into account when planning. the type of devices
to. be employed.

In Easter 1995 I made a complaint to my local. Police station in London, but
the police. have not expressed any intention to do anything about the
continuing harassment ("we're not saying it's happening. and we're not
saying it isn't happening" were the words used). I. think the officer I
spoke to at Easter wasn't aware. of it happening, although other members of
the police force obviously. do know.

From April 1995 until the present time the. matter has been discussed in a
lot of detail on the. Usenet (Internet) "uk.misc" newsgroup. That discussion
has given birth to the article. which you are now reading. My hopes in
posting to Usenet. were that wider publicizing would discourage the security
services from continuing their. harassment, and "draw people out" into
concurring with the truth of what was being said.. Neither of those have
followed, but the discussion. has served a purpose in allowing this
structured report to. be created.

8488

give us.

643. Isaiah 51. The Red Sea an image of the Redemption. Ut sciatis quod
filius hominis habet potestatem remittendi peccata... tibi dico: Surge.116
God, wishing to show that He could form a people holy with an invisible
holiness, and fill them with an eternal glory, made visible things. As
nature is an image of grace, He has done in the bounties of nature what He
would do in those of grace, in order that we might judge that He could make
the invisible, since He made the visible excellently.

Therefore He saved this people from the deluge; He has raised them up from
Abraham, redeemed them from their enemies, and set them at rest.

The object of God was not to save them from the deluge, and raise up a whole
people from Abraham, only in order to bring them into a rich land.

And even grace is only the type of glory, for it is not the ultimate end. It
has been symbolised by the law, and itself symbolises glory. But it is the
type of it, and the origin or cause.

The ordinary life of men is like that of the saints. They all seek their
satisfaction and differ only in the object in which they place it; they call
those their enemies who hinder them, etc. Go