Tech Support > Computers & Technology > Networking > Dedicated Server or not?
Dedicated Server or not?
Posted by Mattrixx on February 24th, 2004


Hi,

My wifes church is ready to replace their ancient hand me down computers
(four, I think), with five (5) new state of the art desktops, and one (1)
laptop.
The question has come up whether or not the church would necessarily need a
*dedicated server*, in addition to the computers already mentioned.

The church is planning on utilizing the hardwire ethernet network (NO
Wireless) they already have in place, to all six "new" computers by
expanding physical connections.
They are also adding SBC DSL for Internet Access. At present, they have just
one computer connected online through a dial-up account and it is NOT
networked with the other
three networked computers.

Looking at some Dell computers, I find that they first of all....recommend
WinXP Pro for each of the computers to be networked (+$60 extra each), and
second, advise a dedicated server (extra $2200) as part of a "total
networking package".

I would really appreciate some opinions on this scenario from people who
dont have any vested interest in the matter.

Thanks in advance

Matt






Posted by Rob on February 24th, 2004



I went with XP Pro on my networked Dell systems and I'm glad I did. The
Simple File Sharing Only feature on XP Home would not have worked properly.

"Mattrixx" <someone@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:cHz_b.16898$PY.11075@newssvr26.news.prodigy.c om...


Posted by dg on February 28th, 2004


Why would they need a server? Until there is an answer for that question,
there is no need for a server. For the DSL to be used by all the computers,
a simple netgear router will do that trick.

--Dan


"Mattrixx" <someone@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:cHz_b.16898$PY.11075@newssvr26.news.prodigy.c om...



Similar Posts