Tech Support > Computers & Technology > Networking > Managed gigabit switches (dgs-1024D) and aggregate/trunking of 2lines into one?
Managed gigabit switches (dgs-1024D) and aggregate/trunking of 2lines into one?
Posted by markm75 on March 6th, 2008


I'm not sure what the terminology is here.. but what do they call
taking say 2, gigabit lines from a server and combining that bandwidth
into one bigger pipe of 2GB?

Is this trunking? Doesnt this require trunking ability on both the
server nic side and the switch?

We have the dlink switch, but i dont see how this could be done via
the interface.. we have intel pro 1000 desktop adapters built into
several servers *dual nics*.. was trying to find out the technical
details on how to combine a dual nic card into one on 2003 server..

Anyone have any info on this?

Thanks

Posted by Yousuf Khan on March 20th, 2008


markm75 wrote:
Yes, it's called trunking.

Network Trunking for PM/Ethernet Administrator's Guide
http://www.pccluster.org/faq/en/refe...-trunking.html

You don't really need to have any support for this within the ethernet
switcher, but hopefully the switcher won't interfere with it; I'll
explain that later. How the trunking software works is that it creates a
virtual ethernet MAC address, which then assigns to all of the physical
ethernet ports involved in the trunking. Those ports then broadcast and
receive using the virtual MAC rather than their own physical MACs. To
all intents and purposes, it looks like there is another ethernet card
on the network.

Where the ethernet switch may interfere with this process is if it gets
confused by seeing the same MAC address coming over multiple ports. The
etherswitch maintains its own ARP cache where it caches the MAC
addresses connected to each port. If a MAC address appears in the ARP
cache on multiple ports, the etherswitch would ideally direct network
packets to all of these relevant ports in a round-robin fashion.
However, if the etherswitch is too dumb (or perhaps, too smart) it will
only direct all of this traffic to only one of the ports and ignore all
of the other ports. That would just nullify all of the advantages of
trunking because all traffic would be directed to one port, and one port
only.

Yousuf Khan