- WINXP, wireless Netgear. Internet access ok, mail does not work.
- Posted by Karolus des Reyches197 on January 30th, 2004
I have the above configuration. A desktop with WINXP and a Laptop with
WINXP. Both home editions.
I use cable by Comcast in MD.
On the desktop all works fine, Internet and mail. Using IE and OE6.x.
On the laptop I use the same, the exact same settings and can access the
web, but cannot get mail.
The router is also Netgear MR314.
When I try to send or receive mail on the laptop it immediately comes up
with:
Your server has unexpectedly terminated, possible network problems, long
inactivity etc etc. None of that is true and I can at this very same time or
thereafter access the mail OE on the despot.
I have checked the settings and they are the same for Mail in laptop and
desktop.
Any other ideas that may help to fix this? Both computers are in the same
room. Signal strength is 5 bars, the highest.
- Posted by Karolus des Reyches197 on January 30th, 2004
I finally succeeded!!!!
I searched again my laptop and somewhere there was still Norton System Works
2002 installed. I had DISABLED it all the time, but apparently that was not
enough.
I did now a total un-install of it and now Internet (which did work before)
and now also E-mail work.
Thanks for all the advice and time of various people
Regards
Karel
"Karolus des Reyches197" <Ritter197@Comcast.net> wrote in message
news:M--dnSveLdSe9ofdRVn-jQ@comcast.com...
- Posted by Noozer on January 30th, 2004
"Karolus des Reyches197" <Ritter197@Comcast.net> wrote in message
news:zLidnfkpB4QNIIfdRVn-gQ@comcast.com...
You really should make sure that you have at least the Antivirus installed.
When using a router, you have to make sure that you are using the correct
subdomain.
Easiest way to find it is to connect one PC directly to cable modem, go to a
DOS window and do an "IPCONFIG /renew" to get your IP information from your
ISP, then do an "IPCONFIG /all" and look for "primary dns suffix", if it's
blank try looking for "connection specific suffix".... This should go into
the DOMAIN setting of your router (or if it isn't there, into the domain
settings in your TCP/IP properties on your computer)
- Posted by Karolus des Reyches197 on January 31st, 2004
I rejoiced too soon!
You just won't believe it (or maybe you will).
But after I was able to get Mail and surf the WEB with the Laptop, I shut it
down, to go to a social meeting. A few hours later when I came back, the
laptop would NOT connect again. Also, the throughput, which was always
10Mbps, dropped to 2Mbps. Why?
But now I am really at a loss.
So would problem has overcome me now?
Regards
Karel
"Noozer" <postmaster@127.0.0.1> wrote in message
news:%bzSb.340815$X%5.21788@pd7tw2no...
- Posted by Noozer on January 31st, 2004
"Karolus des Reyches197" <Ritter197@Comcast.net> wrote in message
news:aaudnXz7tqQhi4HdRVn-gQ@comcast.com...
Because you are using Wireless and it still really isn't good enough to rely
on.
I still think 802.11a is the way to go.
- Posted by Karolus des Reyches197 on January 31st, 2004
"a" ? Is that not from the ancient past?
I am using "b", not "g".
"Noozer" <postmaster@127.0.0.1> wrote in message
news:GPUSb.351162$X%5.172180@pd7tw2no...
- Posted by Karolus des Reyches197 on January 31st, 2004
"Noozer" <postmaster@127.0.0.1> wrote in message
news:GPUSb.351162$X%5.172180@pd7tw2no...
- Posted by kony on January 31st, 2004
On Sat, 31 Jan 2004 16:14:17 -0500, "Karolus des Reyches197"
<Ritter197@Comcast.net> wrote:
It just depends on the environment, and the specific equipment. My
wireless 802.11b gear, mostly D-Link parts, works fine, is reliable
with exception of one very cheap no-name generic card that must stay
relatively nearby the router to work, though i'd already wired all key
locations with CAT-5E so my main disappointment is that I'm suddenly
reminded it's wireless when i try to do something over the lan, like
steaming higher bitrate video.
If your laptop card is a cheap generic, you might try a name brand
card... buy from someplace with a good return policy, and if it
doesn't help the range or speed just return it and pay the restocking
fee.
- Posted by Karolus des Reyches197 on February 1st, 2004
My equipment is all NETGEAR. MR 314 router and MA 401 Card.
"kony" <spam@spam.com> wrote in message
news:u5fo101611tvo7ikkreojpu0chhf74ibd6@4ax.com...
- Posted by Michael on February 1st, 2004
"Karolus des Reyches197" <Ritter197@Comcast.net> wrote in message
news:HIqdncyif7QBh4HdRVn-jw@comcast.com...
Not at all. 802.11a is a newer, faster standard. 802.11b and g both run in
the 2.4Ghz spectrum, while 802.11a runs in the 5Ghz spectrum. 802.11b
maximum speed is 11Mbps, 802.11g maximum is 22Mbps and 802.11a maximum speed
is 54Mbps. 802.11a is also less susceptible to outside interference as the
5 Ghz band is relatively unpopulated at present, while all sorts of noise
generating electronic equipment runs in the 2.4 Ghz band (cell phones,
microwave ovens for instance). 802.11a does have a shorter range, but in a
typical home setting it works just fine. I can't quite get out all the way
to the back of my property using 802.11a (about 150 feet and 2 walls away
from the router location), but it works just fine on the patio.
mike
--
__________________________________________________ ________
"La Longue Carabine"
|"...no elector should ever submit himself
| so implicitly to party as to support a man
| whose private acts prove him to be unfit
| for a public trust. The basis of the rep-
| resentative system is character, and without
| character, no man should be confided in."
-James Fenimore Cooper
- Posted by daytripper on February 1st, 2004
On Sun, 1 Feb 2004 11:55:03 -0500, "Michael" <nojunkmike@charterxxmi.pop>
wrote:
G is "newer" than A. If that matters.
A *can* be the fastest. But
G has a peak throughput very close to A at *its* peak.
Hmm..."GAG"...Wonder if that means anything? ;-)
I have been using a Netgear 802.11a WAP with a pair of laptop cards for two
years come May. In my installation, in my environment, it works great.
Otoh, the Linksys A gear I tried first, failed miserably. Hence the Netgear...
/daytripper (YMMV - more than usual, I suspect)