Obviously, the fact that SCO is a bunch of fraudsters, in the pay of
Microsoft who is obviously intent on stamping out free speech in the
name of their corporate profits, makes them unable to comprehend that
others may have other motivations. SCO is just projecting their own
behavoir on others.

Pamela Jones has clearly refuted the claims by SCO that she is somehow
in the pay of IBM:
http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1107-51704...eader.newsfeed

Clearly, SCO is just upset that a not-for profit entity like groklaw is
able to organize and network individuals in an effort that, thankfully,
has shed light on the FRAUD SCO is now commiting.

The best they can come up with is a smear campaign? What liars.

Erich Friesen

grok@grokkrog wrote: