On Mon, 27 Oct 2003 08:44:29 +0100, Johan Lindquist wrote:

Yes, and when admonishing someone for the whole "he started it", it's
usually the paternal role - if performed correctly - to beat the snot out
of the kid who actually did start it, Johan.

Plenty enough to care about what's said about me.

What fake personalities? And have you not been here for the past month or
two? Or are you just being deliberately obtuse? There's a damn good reason
I don't post under my own name and email address any more - and it's partly
because of people like Mart.

Comedy and contrast. Compare wrt. his post about me.

Funny, Johan... I don't go to other places on the net and bitch about you,
do I? Then why are you so accepting that Mart can quite happily do this, as
well as bitch all he likes about me, without me taking him on?

Yet another example of the Johan Lindquist hypocrisy we've come to know and
love on this newsgroup. If he's pro Linux, then anything goes. If a
pro-Linux guy does something to someone regarded as a troll -- whether that
person is/was/or not -- then no matter what it is, any retaliation means
that the troll gets the Lindquist "Stern Talking To".

God you're pathetic.

On Mon, 27 Oct 2003 07:56:15 GMT, Daniel Rudy wrote:

According to Mart van de Wege, you do want to hear about it. He's the one
starting threads about me here. I'm just providing the same in return.

Milo T. wrote:

<snip>

I'm giving serious consideration to creating a web site documenting your
'thoughts' with hotlinks to your other hobby.

Milo T. threw some tea leaves on the floor
and this is what they wrote:


Yes you *really* are that childish.

Anyway I thought you said you were leaving Cola ?


--
Kind Regards from Terry
My Desktop is powered by GNU/LinuX, Gentoo-1.4_rc2
New Homepage: http://milkstone.d2.net.au/
** Linux Registration Number: 103931, http://counter.li.org **

On 2003-10-27, gazing longingly at the horizon,
Milo T. <fantastical@malaprop.net>
felt a deep, passionate desire to let the following be known:
So you're saying I should reward you for your whining? I'm sure you're
going to raise some very well adjusted and completely self-sufficient
kids one day, Simon, er, Milo. Simon? Milo? I'm confused now, who
am I replying to?

Who are you again, Milo, er, Simon? Or should I ask, who are you
claiming to be this month? Have you taken up the habit of shifting
your alias so as to avoid those pesky people pointing out your
misbehaviour?

The one (this, incidentally) that you were using to post things in
retaliation for some hurt feelings of yours, for one. Since, as you
probably have realised, I've not been visiting this group for some
time, until a couple of weeks ago, I don't know how long you've been
using this alias. The first I saw of it was the trollish articles you
posted, so what do you expect me to think?

Oh of course. Everyone's out to get you, I'm sure. You have a point,
of course, if you were using your real name, some pathetic loser might
try to start rumors about you posting to some site devoted to sodomy.
That'd /surely/ hurt your feelings, wouldn't it? To which level would
you have to escalate the retaliation if that happened, I wonder?

That's pretty much what I was doing when I came to the conclusion that
you're a pathetic loser. You know, the spreading lies thing compared
to the social commentary thing? Neither might be a good idea, but one
is a far cry from the other when it comes to impropriety.

Thanks, I aim to entertain.

I don't know, I haven't been checking up on you. Do you?

You didn't "take him on", you resorted to trying, ever so vainly, to
discredit him by making things up. He, on the other hand asked people
to check for themselves what you were about. What part of your posting
history are you so ashamed of that you react in this childish manner?
Could it be.. your childish manner?

I so love that word. Hypocrisy. It's one of those words you can just
throw around, since it's pretty much a subjective thing who you think
is a hypocrite or not, and in which context you put someone's actions.

Please, feel free to go into detail about /my/ history. If nothing
else, it might entertain you somewhat. Or me, who knows.

If you had any idea what you were talking about here, you'd know that
I'm not very particular about allegience when I decide to dole out one
of those, as you so nicely put it, stern talkings to.

Taking the lord's good name in vain now? He'll surely smite you for
that, won't he now.

--
Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a banana. Perth ---> *
22:03:14 up 22 days, 7:05, 7 users, load average: 2.01, 2.05, 2.01
$ cat /dev/bollocks Registered Linux user #261729
drive e-business portals

Peter Köhlmann <Peter.Koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote in message news:<bnjafv$d3h$06$1@news.t-online.com>...
Before? What? Are you trying to speak English again, my dear little sociopath?

On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 08:03:18 +1100, Terry wrote:
I thought you already did leave, Terry.

"Milo T." <fantastical@malaprop.net> writes:

(for the understanding of the uninitiated: Milo T. is an alias used by
Simon Cooke).


1. I point out that you may have a prior bias against someone who posts
anti-MS sentiments on WWW bulletin boards; you suggest I frequent
sites of a less-savoury persuasion.

2. You start a dick size war over our respective Slashdot UIDs.

3. You play AC sock puppets against me in a Slashdot discussion to
reinforce your importance.

4. You call someone else a kook; you yourself fly off on impotent
rages in every online discussion forum you've visited.

stop digging.

BTW, who's following who around? I *have* been posting to Slashdot
since 2001. It was inevitable that we would run into each other there
as well, especially considering that you do appear to be a prolific
poster there.

As I said, I merely posted the reference to COLA because that AC reply
you posted to that thread so nicely reinforced the impression you are
making here by posting as Milo T. *long* after you said you'd leave
(and *way* before this minor incident. That has been pointed out to
you, and Google Groups shows your defence to be the lie that it is).

And for the record: if you want to play 'he started it!' games, let me
point out that I did not post the link to COLA *before* you started
sock-puppeteering on Slashdot.

I don't need to know anything about Lewis Mettler to know a lot about
you Simon. Actually, I think he'd be hard pressed to be half the
nutcase you are.

Mart

--
'The pipe is a sturdy and stalwart companion, ever dependable, ever
friendly, and each posessing of its own personality for us to learn to
understand, to nurture, to befriend. In the post-modern world, how
many things can claim such wonderful attributes?' (G.L. Pease)

poster->Mart van de Wege <mvdwege.usenet@wanadoo.nl>



2 Liter Pepsi just 99p at Mart van de Wege!

Mart van de Wege savings 24 x 7 !!!

Shop at a Mart van de Wege near you....

Somewhere around the time of 10/27/2003 01:12, the world stopped and
listened as Milo T. contributed this to humanity:

Other people might, but I don't. Quite frankly I'm just glad that you
were gone.

--
Daniel Rudy

Remove nospam, invalid, and 0123456789 to reply.

On 30 Oct 2003 15:17:53 +0100, Mart van de Wege wrote:
The funny thing, Mart, is that you don't really know anything about me.

begin <1i20srvc7jun8.r2ek7fhixi82$@fanatastical.malaprop .net>,
"Milo T." <fantastical@malaprop.net> writes:
Anyone that has read your posts on COLA knows a lot about the low life
you are Simon COoke. Whatever abilities you have you are dearly
lacking in character. Your ethical values are also sadly lacking. To
sum it up you are a poor excuse of a human being.

Now begone as you have promised several times before to do.

Milo T. wrote:
That's not the funny part; the funny part is that you apparently felt
the need to communicate this...

--
the Entity Formerly Known As Jazz

You know, I almost put a .sig down here.

On Sat, 1 Nov 2003 11:17:30 +0100, Roy Culley wrote:

And anyone who has met me knows differently, Roy.

Milo T. wrote:

Yeah, those probably don't even regard you as "human being"
--
Try to be the best of whatever you are, even if what you are is
no good.

On Sat, 01 Nov 2003 20:00:55 +0100, Peter Köhlmann wrote:

You know, you'd be a lot less boring and a lot more amiable if you stopped
with the broken-record routine, Peter.

Try lightening up a bit. Or at the very least, get a clue.

Milo T. wrote:

Seems I got at you, Simone Kook.
And thanks, I have a clue. Several of them. I have more to spare than you
will ever get
--
Only two things are infinite,
the Universe and Stupidity.
And I'm not quite sure about the former.
- Albert Einstein

begin <1x3u2dz6wkpaq$.1o6r3ifzf9bv4@fanatastical.malapro p.net>,
"Milo T." <fantastical@malaprop.net> writes:
That has nothing to do with the way you portray yourself on COLA. I'm
more likely to call a fool a fool on COLA then in real life but other
than that I'm the same guy all the time. I would hope that you do
behave more responsibly to people you associate with in real
life. Begs the question as to why you need to be such an obnoxious
arsehole here.

On Sat, 01 Nov 2003 22:46:35 +0100, Peter Köhlmann wrote:
I think you'll find that the phrase is "got *TO* you", and no, you haven't.

How could someone who's total rhetoric on usenet consists of insults, and
who is the Linux equivalent of Kadaitcha Man "get" to me?

On 2003-11-02, gazing longingly at the horizon,
Milo T. <fantastical@malaprop.net>
felt a deep, passionate desire to let the following be known:

I'm guessing the answer to that is "you're really easy to wind up".

--
Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a banana. Perth ---> *
04:17:04 up 27 days, 13:20, 5 users, load average: 2.10, 2.13, 2.09
$ cat /dev/bollocks Registered Linux user #261729
orchestrate open-source metrics