Milo T. wrote:

Well, I quite obviously can. Don't you agree, asshole?
--
You're not my type. For that matter, you're not even my species

On Sun, 02 Nov 2003 08:40:57 +0100, Peter Köhlmann wrote:

No, idiot.

Milo T. wrote:

Fine, does not make it true, though.
Found not yet another dead relative os a poster to make fun of, asshole?
--
Support bacteria -- it's the only culture some people have!

On Sun, 02 Nov 2003 11:00:05 +0100, Peter Köhlmann wrote:


Learn the language if you're going to try to use it, idiot.

Milo T. wrote:

Gute Idee, Schmalspur-Denker. Nun wirst du sicherlich antworten können, da
du ja so toll die Sprache beherrscht.
Soll ich das nächste Posting in Französisch machen? Du bist ja so
sprachbegabt, Simone

Schwachkopf
--
Howe's Law: Everyone has a scheme that will not work.

On Sun, 02 Nov 2003 11:33:51 +0100, Peter Köhlmann wrote:

Peter, I don't care how good your german is. Nor how good your french is.
If you're going to try insulting me in English, you'd better get it right.

Another clue: the word "of" is spelled "o" "f", not "o" "s".

Now go back to calling people idiots, you idiot.

Milo T. wrote:

Have you ever heard the word "typo", idiot?
And no, I don't think that you are a match to me language wise.
So just keep on calling me "idiot" for typos or sentences just not perfectly
right, and everyone else will see that you have no arguments left. Which
youz haven't
You are much better in searching for dead brothers of posters to make fun of
In short, you might resemble a human being when you really work at it
--
Microsoft's Guide To System Design:
Flakey and built to stay that way.

On Sun, 02 Nov 2003 23:10:31 +0100, Peter Köhlmann wrote:
I apologized for that, Peter. Not that you'll care, and not that in the
scheme of things it makes any difference, but I did.

I don't really care whether you drop it or not, but when it comes down to
it, it's not really anything I care about coming from *you*.

From some other people here - say, Jim Richardson, or GreyCloud - I might
take it to heart. From you? You're a joke, man.

Milo T. wrote:

You "sort of" apologized for it. And invalidated that apology within the
very same post by your ususal "he started it" routine.
Nope, Simone, you did *not* apologize. Not in a way anybody else (except
you) would recognize as an apology. If you had conveied that you really
were sorry, I might feel different. You did not
--
Support bacteria -- it's the only culture some people have!

Milo T. spilled his alphabet soup on the floor,
and the letters spelled:

Certainly nobody can claim that this thread is going off-topic.

--
***** Matthew Powell *******************************
****** http://www.franoculator.com *****************
******* Visit us on #cola on irc.oftc.net **********

On Sun, 02 Nov 2003 23:50:16 +0100, Peter Köhlmann wrote:

I didn't know that you read other people's emails, Peter. So assuming that
you don't, how would you know whether I apologized or not?

Milo T. spilled his alphabet soup on the floor,
and the letters spelled:
You did? I don't seem to remember that. Msg ID please? I had almost
forgotton about that, until now. I suddenly remember just what a
lowlife you are.

And you're a troll, man.

--
***** Matthew Powell *******************************
****** http://www.franoculator.com *****************
******* Visit us on #cola on irc.oftc.net **********

Milo T. wrote:

I read what you write here. What you write as email to other people is of
absolutely no consequence, since your making fun of a dead brother was not
by email, but on this very group. So you can apologize all you want, if you
don't do it openly, it is non-existant for this group.
See how simply it is, you swine?
--
Howe's Law: Everyone has a scheme that will not work.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sun, 02 Nov 2003 23:03:24 GMT,
Franoculator <matt@morpheus.franoculator.com> wrote:
it was a lowpoint, that's for sure, but Simon did apologize IIRC.



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/pZUsd90bcYOAWPYRAueAAKDQKUSw81cE4RRQLXXdHXmGdKbD4w CguHoS
MALDqgVpUbmJSL1Ls0BcY10=
=BJw+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
Jim Richardson http://www.eskimo.com/~warlock
Yesterday it worked.
Today it is not working.
Windows is like that.

On Mon, 03 Nov 2003 00:05:44 +0100, Peter Köhlmann wrote:

Funny, it wasn't your brother I was making comments about - nor was I
"making fun" of him - so I don't see how it's any of your business,
regardless of the forum.

On Sun, 02 Nov 2003 23:03:24 GMT, Franoculator wrote:

If Alan decides that it's ok for me to post that message here, I will.
However, I'm not going to publish a private apology here without his
consent.

Milo T. spilled his alphabet soup on the floor,
and the letters spelled:
Yeah. I am sure he'd love to let you do that. And that's beside the
point. We are discussing a stupid, lowlife post that you made several
months back in this arena. Private email correspondence between two
parties is of little value to this newsgroup.

--
***** Matthew Powell *******************************
****** http://www.franoculator.com *****************
******* Visit us on #cola on irc.oftc.net **********

On Mon, 03 Nov 2003 04:32:35 GMT, Franoculator wrote:

Yes, and the person I apologized to is the one who's brother's memory I
disrespected. If that private apology is of little value to this newsgroup,
so is people still going on about the original post.

As I said; if he decides it's ok for me to post that apology here, then
that's fine. As far as I'm concerned, I apologized to him personally, and
that's the end of it. He's the only person I wronged with my comments, and
he's the only one I have any kind of responsibility to regarding them.

Or are you seriously claiming that you were wronged by those comments,
Matthew?

Simon

Milo T. spilled his alphabet soup on the floor,
and the letters spelled:


Wronged? Of course not. Offended? In a round-about way. I felt for
the person you offended. I lost a considerable amount of respect for
you following that post. You were in my bozo file for quite some time
afterwards, as a matter of fact.

Now, out of respect, I'd like to see this discussion end. I have no
desire to read your apology. If you say you sent one, fine. It still
doesn't change the fact that you cannot draw the line. If you have to
bring up a suicide to forward your anti-linux agenda, I don't have one
single iota of respect for you, neither as a fellow citizen of the
Internet, or as a human being for that matter; and will always regard
you as a sickness that is plaguing the community.

--
***** Matthew Powell *******************************
****** http://www.franoculator.com *****************
******* Visit us on #cola on irc.oftc.net **********

Franoculator blubbered effusively on Mon, 03 Nov 2003 at 05:08 GMT:

For the record, it wasn't suicide. He died of cancer. One of the worst,
no less. Whether or not Simon misunderstaood that as well, I don't know
and am not inclined to attempt finding out.

Beyond that I'm staying completely away from this discussion as I
already made all of the comments I plan to make previously.

--
Windows XP - From the people that brought you EDLIN.