Kadaitcha Man wrote:
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

Violation of an RFC? Do you even know what the fuck is an RFC??

Somebody help that poor fuck. He violated a "request for comment".

--
Kadaitcha Man: Kicking fuckwits in the head on Usenet since 1989
http://kadaitcha.kicks-ass.org:83/
Linux makes you stupid

Kadaitcha Man <nospam@rainx.cjb.net> wrote:
Wrong.

--
Some Big Cunt

Kadaitcha Man wrote:
What was that you wrote earlier about seriousness? Ah, here it is...

"It's just some newsgroup bullshit and you can admit it's fun watching
people get all worked up over some usenet posting. The more they take this
shit seriously, the more fun it is bending their minds, m8."

Foot > mouth.

--
Bluster lessons given free

On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 23:30:53 +0000, Kadaitcha Man wrote:

I'm responding to this thread only because I do not want to be in
violation of the RFC.

David Crick wrote:

Where's your sig? You may be in violation!

Kadaitcha Man wrote:
....or, AOL.

--
Diogenes Laertius

"David Crick" <crick@crick.crick> wrote in message
newsan.2003.11.19.02.39.57.235371@crick.crick...
London to a bucket of pig snot says you use linux.

--
Bluster lessons given free

Kadaitcha Man wrote:
Begging for snacks on usenet is a new low for you.

--
Bluster lessons given free

"Kadaitcha Man" <nospam@rainx.cjb.net> wrote in message
news:e7Bub.12321$MB4.8323@lakeread02...
So, you've never been to London then.

--
Bluster lessons given free

"Kadaitcha Man" <nospam@rainx.cjb.net> wrote:
1143 The Q Method of Implementing TELNET Option Negotiation. D.J.
Bernstein. Feb-01-1990. (Format: TXT=23331 bytes) (Status:
EXPERIMENTAL)

If I decide to use the M method of implementing TELNET, will I be in violation
of RFC 1143? Will I go to jail?

Will Windows make me stupid?

--
Bluster lessons given free