Tech Support > Microsoft Windows > Performance/Maintainence > Re: Faulting application services.exe... faulting module esent.dll
Re: Faulting application services.exe... faulting module esent.dll
Posted by Bosmm on October 12th, 2005


I am soo glad I found this post!!!!

I too am having the exact same problem. I had users that were disjoined from
the Domain when we opened up an outstation. After all my searching for a
problem I was convinced it had to be something specific with the "other"
network they are now on. I am going to start wading through your fixes and
see where I get.

There was definately a business reason for removing the computers from the
Domain and I would DEFINATELY call this a BUG...

Thanks again!

"Jeff Vandervoort" wrote:

> That didn't happen on my test system, but I don't like that workaround
> anyway...too many side-effects. So I've only done it on one system, just to
> confirm PSS's results.
>
> My suggestion is to create a Startup Script that adds the Restricted Groups
> to the local SAM instead of using the AD Restricted Groups feature.
>
> Also, an update for all lurkers...make sure to append your "me too" message
> to this thread and keep it alive. I just received a call from MS PSS and
> they are evaluating the cost-effectiveness of fixing this issue. The guy I
> spoke to was skeptical that it affected many people...his reasoning was,
> "How many people disjoin a computer from a domain?". My client has a good
> reason to do so...how about you? I've given the Google Search URL for this
> thread to them and have reason to believe it's being monitored. I'm going to
> forward it again to the PSS contact who's preparing the business case for
> fixing it. So keep posting, folks!
>
> --
> Jeff Vandervoort
> JRVsystems
> "DSipp" <DSipp@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:25CAB71F-2D03-404E-84A2-8FCB2DD9BBB0@microsoft.com...
> > How do I move those files? The system says they are locked and in safe
> > mode
> > they are gone?
> >
> > "Jeff Vandervoort" wrote:
> >
> >> We're seeing the same thing here; I can confirm the results. And since
> >> Tomas
> >> posted a reply here, I thought I should too!
> >>
> >> Tomas' workaround worked for me, too, but while it fixes the ESENT.DLL
> >> crash, it has side effects you need to be aware of. If there are other
> >> security policies in GPO, they will not be removed when the computer is
> >> removed from the domain. The SceCli and Userenv errors will continue
> >> (although the SceCli one will change a bit).
> >>
> >> The only complete solution I know of is not to use Restricted Groups that
> >> have domain accounts among their members in a GPO that is in scope for a
> >> computer that will be removed from a domain. Fortunately, that was an
> >> option
> >> for us in this case, with only modest hardship. I haven't done this, yet,
> >> but will likely substitute a startup script that adds the group for me
> >> and
> >> the hardship will disappear; I don't care if the group doesn't get
> >> removed
> >> when the machine is removed from the domain.
> >>
> >> On a related note, I opened a Microsoft PSS incident for this. They have
> >> reproduced the behavior in their lab. PSS carefully avoided giving me any
> >> information about whether they intended to develop a fix; hopefully they
> >> will. This strikes me as a significant bug.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Jeff Vandervoort
> >> JRVsystems
> >> "T0MAS" <T0MAS.1q1k2c@> wrote in message
> >> news:fPKdndBzirQPjz3fRVn_vg@giganews.com...
> >> >
> >> > I have solved same problem with crashing services.exe.
> >> >
> >> > User on bussiness trip removed his notebook from domain.
> >> > He reports problem with error message :
> >> > Title of window : Services and Controller app
> >> > in error message: Error signature szAppName: Services.exe .....
> >> > in event log was event 1000 Faulting application services.exe, version
> >> > 5.1.2600.2180, faulting module esent.dll, version 5.1.2600.2180, fault
> >> > address 0x0002334c.
> >> > After clicking on Close button apears automatic shutdown counter and in
> >> > 30 seconds system was restarted.
> >> > This same behaviour repeated several times.
> >> > In evet log I found misc. events with probably related with this
> >> > problem:
> >> >
> >> > The Group Policy client-side extension Security failed to execute
> >> > (event 1085)
> >> > Faulting application services.exe
> >> > Security policies were propagated with warning. 0x428 (event 1202)
> >> >
> >> > in winlogon.log (I have enabled debug for that purpose) I found:
> >> > ----Configure Group Membership...
> >> > Configure Administrators.
> >> > Error 1332: No mapping between account names and security IDs was
> >> > done.
> >> > Error occurred during lookup of all accounts.
> >> >
> >> > It was seems that some domain policy that contains Restricted group
> >> > feature remains on notebook and periodically in moment when policy was
> >> > refreshed caused error with services.exe. I knew that when notebook was
> >> > removed from domain then domain policy cannot applied to non-member
> >> > computer.
> >> > I made several actions : I again joined notebook to domain(then
> >> > restart) and again I removed it and problem occured again and again. I
> >> > disabled background policy refresh, I set refresh interval to max value
> >> > 45 days and nothing helps. When automatic shutdown apears I stoped it
> >> > every time by command shutdown /a.
> >> > Every time I found in winlogon.log that some policy tryed manage
> >> > membership in groups and ends with error because probably did not have
> >> > access to domain (notebook was removed from domain).
> >> >
> >> > I have tryed to check consistency od secedit.sdb by esentutl /g
> >> > %windir%\Security\Database\Secedit.sdb and all was OK.
> >> > Excuse my english.
> >> > After that i crossed my mind that it may not caused by deffective
> >> > remained domain policy but it may caused by local group policy which
> >> > contain domain accounts (SIDs). Thats my deduction.
> >> > After that I moved c:\WINDOWS\security\Database\secedit.sdb and
> >> > c:\WINDOWS\security\*edb* and c:\WINDOWS\security\*.log to backup
> >> > folder and after restart local group policy was reseted and after that
> >> > user confirmed that error never apears and all works fine.
> >> >
> >> > In my case (case of one of my users) problem with crashing services.exe
> >> > and periodical restarts was solved by reseting local group policy (by
> >> > removing database and related files).
> >> >
> >> > When I begin solving of this problem I spent to much time with
> >> > searching similar problem on Internet but I din't found equal. This
> >> > page was not usefull exactly in my cause but everytime when I searching
> >> > on Inet by using misc. search engines I everytime get this page
> >> > therefore I decided to write my solution here.
> >> > I have writed in this my article too much informations because each
> >> > user searching this problem on Internet with miscelaneous with keywords
> >> > and therefore I writed so much (for search engines too).
> >> >
> >> > I hope that same case may happen to someone and my story may helps
> >> > him.
> >> >
> >> > Admin from Slovak Republic (Slovakia not Slovenia)
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > T0MASPosted from http://www.pcreview.co.uk/ newsgroup access
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>

>
>
>

Posted by Jeff Vandervoort on October 18th, 2005


Well, my "grass roots" campaign has failed. Only 1 "me too". Whether that
had anything to do with the outcome or not, I don't know, but the response I
just received from Microsoft is that they have no current plans to fix this
bug. It has been submitted as a change request for future consideration.

Folks, it's official: We're on our own. Good luck!

--
Jeff Vandervoort
JRVsystems

"Bosmm" <Bosmm@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:19D71B2A-80BA-4117-AD65-493841DB511F@microsoft.com...
>I am soo glad I found this post!!!!
>
> I too am having the exact same problem. I had users that were disjoined
> from
> the Domain when we opened up an outstation. After all my searching for a
> problem I was convinced it had to be something specific with the "other"
> network they are now on. I am going to start wading through your fixes and
> see where I get.
>
> There was definately a business reason for removing the computers from the
> Domain and I would DEFINATELY call this a BUG...
>
> Thanks again!
>
> "Jeff Vandervoort" wrote:
>
>> That didn't happen on my test system, but I don't like that workaround
>> anyway...too many side-effects. So I've only done it on one system, just
>> to
>> confirm PSS's results.
>>
>> My suggestion is to create a Startup Script that adds the Restricted
>> Groups
>> to the local SAM instead of using the AD Restricted Groups feature.
>>
>> Also, an update for all lurkers...make sure to append your "me too"
>> message
>> to this thread and keep it alive. I just received a call from MS PSS and
>> they are evaluating the cost-effectiveness of fixing this issue. The guy
>> I
>> spoke to was skeptical that it affected many people...his reasoning was,
>> "How many people disjoin a computer from a domain?". My client has a good
>> reason to do so...how about you? I've given the Google Search URL for
>> this
>> thread to them and have reason to believe it's being monitored. I'm going
>> to
>> forward it again to the PSS contact who's preparing the business case for
>> fixing it. So keep posting, folks!
>>
>> --
>> Jeff Vandervoort
>> JRVsystems
>> "DSipp" <DSipp@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> news:25CAB71F-2D03-404E-84A2-8FCB2DD9BBB0@microsoft.com...
>> > How do I move those files? The system says they are locked and in safe
>> > mode
>> > they are gone?
>> >
>> > "Jeff Vandervoort" wrote:
>> >
>> >> We're seeing the same thing here; I can confirm the results. And since
>> >> Tomas
>> >> posted a reply here, I thought I should too!
>> >>
>> >> Tomas' workaround worked for me, too, but while it fixes the ESENT.DLL
>> >> crash, it has side effects you need to be aware of. If there are other
>> >> security policies in GPO, they will not be removed when the computer
>> >> is
>> >> removed from the domain. The SceCli and Userenv errors will continue
>> >> (although the SceCli one will change a bit).
>> >>
>> >> The only complete solution I know of is not to use Restricted Groups
>> >> that
>> >> have domain accounts among their members in a GPO that is in scope for
>> >> a
>> >> computer that will be removed from a domain. Fortunately, that was an
>> >> option
>> >> for us in this case, with only modest hardship. I haven't done this,
>> >> yet,
>> >> but will likely substitute a startup script that adds the group for me
>> >> and
>> >> the hardship will disappear; I don't care if the group doesn't get
>> >> removed
>> >> when the machine is removed from the domain.
>> >>
>> >> On a related note, I opened a Microsoft PSS incident for this. They
>> >> have
>> >> reproduced the behavior in their lab. PSS carefully avoided giving me
>> >> any
>> >> information about whether they intended to develop a fix; hopefully
>> >> they
>> >> will. This strikes me as a significant bug.
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Jeff Vandervoort
>> >> JRVsystems
>> >> "T0MAS" <T0MAS.1q1k2c@> wrote in message
>> >> news:fPKdndBzirQPjz3fRVn_vg@giganews.com...
>> >> >
>> >> > I have solved same problem with crashing services.exe.
>> >> >
>> >> > User on bussiness trip removed his notebook from domain.
>> >> > He reports problem with error message :
>> >> > Title of window : Services and Controller app
>> >> > in error message: Error signature szAppName: Services.exe .....
>> >> > in event log was event 1000 Faulting application services.exe,
>> >> > version
>> >> > 5.1.2600.2180, faulting module esent.dll, version 5.1.2600.2180,
>> >> > fault
>> >> > address 0x0002334c.
>> >> > After clicking on Close button apears automatic shutdown counter and
>> >> > in
>> >> > 30 seconds system was restarted.
>> >> > This same behaviour repeated several times.
>> >> > In evet log I found misc. events with probably related with this
>> >> > problem:
>> >> >
>> >> > The Group Policy client-side extension Security failed to execute
>> >> > (event 1085)
>> >> > Faulting application services.exe
>> >> > Security policies were propagated with warning. 0x428 (event 1202)
>> >> >
>> >> > in winlogon.log (I have enabled debug for that purpose) I found:
>> >> > ----Configure Group Membership...
>> >> > Configure Administrators.
>> >> > Error 1332: No mapping between account names and security IDs was
>> >> > done.
>> >> > Error occurred during lookup of all accounts.
>> >> >
>> >> > It was seems that some domain policy that contains Restricted group
>> >> > feature remains on notebook and periodically in moment when policy
>> >> > was
>> >> > refreshed caused error with services.exe. I knew that when notebook
>> >> > was
>> >> > removed from domain then domain policy cannot applied to non-member
>> >> > computer.
>> >> > I made several actions : I again joined notebook to domain(then
>> >> > restart) and again I removed it and problem occured again and again.
>> >> > I
>> >> > disabled background policy refresh, I set refresh interval to max
>> >> > value
>> >> > 45 days and nothing helps. When automatic shutdown apears I stoped
>> >> > it
>> >> > every time by command shutdown /a.
>> >> > Every time I found in winlogon.log that some policy tryed manage
>> >> > membership in groups and ends with error because probably did not
>> >> > have
>> >> > access to domain (notebook was removed from domain).
>> >> >
>> >> > I have tryed to check consistency od secedit.sdb by esentutl /g
>> >> > %windir%\Security\Database\Secedit.sdb and all was OK.
>> >> > Excuse my english.
>> >> > After that i crossed my mind that it may not caused by deffective
>> >> > remained domain policy but it may caused by local group policy which
>> >> > contain domain accounts (SIDs). Thats my deduction.
>> >> > After that I moved c:\WINDOWS\security\Database\secedit.sdb and
>> >> > c:\WINDOWS\security\*edb* and c:\WINDOWS\security\*.log to backup
>> >> > folder and after restart local group policy was reseted and after
>> >> > that
>> >> > user confirmed that error never apears and all works fine.
>> >> >
>> >> > In my case (case of one of my users) problem with crashing
>> >> > services.exe
>> >> > and periodical restarts was solved by reseting local group policy
>> >> > (by
>> >> > removing database and related files).
>> >> >
>> >> > When I begin solving of this problem I spent to much time with
>> >> > searching similar problem on Internet but I din't found equal. This
>> >> > page was not usefull exactly in my cause but everytime when I
>> >> > searching
>> >> > on Inet by using misc. search engines I everytime get this page
>> >> > therefore I decided to write my solution here.
>> >> > I have writed in this my article too much informations because each
>> >> > user searching this problem on Internet with miscelaneous with
>> >> > keywords
>> >> > and therefore I writed so much (for search engines too).
>> >> >
>> >> > I hope that same case may happen to someone and my story may helps
>> >> > him.
>> >> >
>> >> > Admin from Slovak Republic (Slovakia not Slovenia)
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > T0MASPosted from http://www.pcreview.co.uk/ newsgroup access
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>

>>
>>
>>



Posted by Jeff Vandervoort on October 18th, 2005


And, at this writing at least, the bug still does not appear to be
documented on Microsoft's Knowledge Base. I've requested that it be
added...for whatever that's worth.

--
Jeff Vandervoort
JRVsystems
"Bosmm" <Bosmm@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:19D71B2A-80BA-4117-AD65-493841DB511F@microsoft.com...
>I am soo glad I found this post!!!!
>
> I too am having the exact same problem. I had users that were disjoined
> from
> the Domain when we opened up an outstation. After all my searching for a
> problem I was convinced it had to be something specific with the "other"
> network they are now on. I am going to start wading through your fixes and
> see where I get.
>
> There was definately a business reason for removing the computers from the
> Domain and I would DEFINATELY call this a BUG...
>
> Thanks again!
>
> "Jeff Vandervoort" wrote:
>
>> That didn't happen on my test system, but I don't like that workaround
>> anyway...too many side-effects. So I've only done it on one system, just
>> to
>> confirm PSS's results.
>>
>> My suggestion is to create a Startup Script that adds the Restricted
>> Groups
>> to the local SAM instead of using the AD Restricted Groups feature.
>>
>> Also, an update for all lurkers...make sure to append your "me too"
>> message
>> to this thread and keep it alive. I just received a call from MS PSS and
>> they are evaluating the cost-effectiveness of fixing this issue. The guy
>> I
>> spoke to was skeptical that it affected many people...his reasoning was,
>> "How many people disjoin a computer from a domain?". My client has a good
>> reason to do so...how about you? I've given the Google Search URL for
>> this
>> thread to them and have reason to believe it's being monitored. I'm going
>> to
>> forward it again to the PSS contact who's preparing the business case for
>> fixing it. So keep posting, folks!
>>
>> --
>> Jeff Vandervoort
>> JRVsystems
>> "DSipp" <DSipp@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> news:25CAB71F-2D03-404E-84A2-8FCB2DD9BBB0@microsoft.com...
>> > How do I move those files? The system says they are locked and in safe
>> > mode
>> > they are gone?
>> >
>> > "Jeff Vandervoort" wrote:
>> >
>> >> We're seeing the same thing here; I can confirm the results. And since
>> >> Tomas
>> >> posted a reply here, I thought I should too!
>> >>
>> >> Tomas' workaround worked for me, too, but while it fixes the ESENT.DLL
>> >> crash, it has side effects you need to be aware of. If there are other
>> >> security policies in GPO, they will not be removed when the computer
>> >> is
>> >> removed from the domain. The SceCli and Userenv errors will continue
>> >> (although the SceCli one will change a bit).
>> >>
>> >> The only complete solution I know of is not to use Restricted Groups
>> >> that
>> >> have domain accounts among their members in a GPO that is in scope for
>> >> a
>> >> computer that will be removed from a domain. Fortunately, that was an
>> >> option
>> >> for us in this case, with only modest hardship. I haven't done this,
>> >> yet,
>> >> but will likely substitute a startup script that adds the group for me
>> >> and
>> >> the hardship will disappear; I don't care if the group doesn't get
>> >> removed
>> >> when the machine is removed from the domain.
>> >>
>> >> On a related note, I opened a Microsoft PSS incident for this. They
>> >> have
>> >> reproduced the behavior in their lab. PSS carefully avoided giving me
>> >> any
>> >> information about whether they intended to develop a fix; hopefully
>> >> they
>> >> will. This strikes me as a significant bug.
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Jeff Vandervoort
>> >> JRVsystems
>> >> "T0MAS" <T0MAS.1q1k2c@> wrote in message
>> >> news:fPKdndBzirQPjz3fRVn_vg@giganews.com...
>> >> >
>> >> > I have solved same problem with crashing services.exe.
>> >> >
>> >> > User on bussiness trip removed his notebook from domain.
>> >> > He reports problem with error message :
>> >> > Title of window : Services and Controller app
>> >> > in error message: Error signature szAppName: Services.exe .....
>> >> > in event log was event 1000 Faulting application services.exe,
>> >> > version
>> >> > 5.1.2600.2180, faulting module esent.dll, version 5.1.2600.2180,
>> >> > fault
>> >> > address 0x0002334c.
>> >> > After clicking on Close button apears automatic shutdown counter and
>> >> > in
>> >> > 30 seconds system was restarted.
>> >> > This same behaviour repeated several times.
>> >> > In evet log I found misc. events with probably related with this
>> >> > problem:
>> >> >
>> >> > The Group Policy client-side extension Security failed to execute
>> >> > (event 1085)
>> >> > Faulting application services.exe
>> >> > Security policies were propagated with warning. 0x428 (event 1202)
>> >> >
>> >> > in winlogon.log (I have enabled debug for that purpose) I found:
>> >> > ----Configure Group Membership...
>> >> > Configure Administrators.
>> >> > Error 1332: No mapping between account names and security IDs was
>> >> > done.
>> >> > Error occurred during lookup of all accounts.
>> >> >
>> >> > It was seems that some domain policy that contains Restricted group
>> >> > feature remains on notebook and periodically in moment when policy
>> >> > was
>> >> > refreshed caused error with services.exe. I knew that when notebook
>> >> > was
>> >> > removed from domain then domain policy cannot applied to non-member
>> >> > computer.
>> >> > I made several actions : I again joined notebook to domain(then
>> >> > restart) and again I removed it and problem occured again and again.
>> >> > I
>> >> > disabled background policy refresh, I set refresh interval to max
>> >> > value
>> >> > 45 days and nothing helps. When automatic shutdown apears I stoped
>> >> > it
>> >> > every time by command shutdown /a.
>> >> > Every time I found in winlogon.log that some policy tryed manage
>> >> > membership in groups and ends with error because probably did not
>> >> > have
>> >> > access to domain (notebook was removed from domain).
>> >> >
>> >> > I have tryed to check consistency od secedit.sdb by esentutl /g
>> >> > %windir%\Security\Database\Secedit.sdb and all was OK.
>> >> > Excuse my english.
>> >> > After that i crossed my mind that it may not caused by deffective
>> >> > remained domain policy but it may caused by local group policy which
>> >> > contain domain accounts (SIDs). Thats my deduction.
>> >> > After that I moved c:\WINDOWS\security\Database\secedit.sdb and
>> >> > c:\WINDOWS\security\*edb* and c:\WINDOWS\security\*.log to backup
>> >> > folder and after restart local group policy was reseted and after
>> >> > that
>> >> > user confirmed that error never apears and all works fine.
>> >> >
>> >> > In my case (case of one of my users) problem with crashing
>> >> > services.exe
>> >> > and periodical restarts was solved by reseting local group policy
>> >> > (by
>> >> > removing database and related files).
>> >> >
>> >> > When I begin solving of this problem I spent to much time with
>> >> > searching similar problem on Internet but I din't found equal. This
>> >> > page was not usefull exactly in my cause but everytime when I
>> >> > searching
>> >> > on Inet by using misc. search engines I everytime get this page
>> >> > therefore I decided to write my solution here.
>> >> > I have writed in this my article too much informations because each
>> >> > user searching this problem on Internet with miscelaneous with
>> >> > keywords
>> >> > and therefore I writed so much (for search engines too).
>> >> >
>> >> > I hope that same case may happen to someone and my story may helps
>> >> > him.
>> >> >
>> >> > Admin from Slovak Republic (Slovakia not Slovenia)
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > T0MASPosted from http://www.pcreview.co.uk/ newsgroup access
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>

>>
>>
>>



Posted by rfrendreiss on December 5th, 2005



Thanks for all of your responses. I am getting this error too on a
laptop that was removed from the domain. There is a need to be able to
remove yourself from one domain and add to another, especially if you
travel to different companies and do consulting work. I have to change
my domain constantly. Perhaps Microsoft could change their app to allow
multiple domain connection configuration.... Oh well. Anyway thanks
for the fix ideas. I have tried them and am waiting to see if I still
get this message. Hopefully Microsoft will decide to put a fix out
there for this.
Jeff Vandervoort Wrote:
> And, at this writing at least, the bug still does not appear to be
> documented on Microsoft's Knowledge Base. I've requested that it be
> added...for whatever that's worth.
>
> --
> Jeff Vandervoort
> JRVsystems
> "Bosmm" Bosmm@discussions.microsoft.com wrote in message
> news:19D71B2A-80BA-4117-AD65-493841DB511F@microsoft.com...
> I am soo glad I found this post!!!!
>
> I too am having the exact same problem. I had users that were
> disjoined
> from
> the Domain when we opened up an outstation. After all my searching for
> a
> problem I was convinced it had to be something specific with the
> "other"
> network they are now on. I am going to start wading through your fixes
> and
> see where I get.
>
> There was definately a business reason for removing the computers from
> the
> Domain and I would DEFINATELY call this a BUG...
>
> Thanks again!
>
> "Jeff Vandervoort" wrote:
>
> That didn't happen on my test system, but I don't like that
> workaround
> anyway...too many side-effects. So I've only done it on one system,
> just
> to
> confirm PSS's results.
>
> My suggestion is to create a Startup Script that adds the Restricted
> Groups
> to the local SAM instead of using the AD Restricted Groups feature.
>
> Also, an update for all lurkers...make sure to append your "me too"
> message
> to this thread and keep it alive. I just received a call from MS PSS
> and
> they are evaluating the cost-effectiveness of fixing this issue. The
> guy
> I
> spoke to was skeptical that it affected many people...his reasoning
> was,
> "How many people disjoin a computer from a domain?". My client has a
> good
> reason to do so...how about you? I've given the Google Search URL for
> this
> thread to them and have reason to believe it's being monitored. I'm
> going
> to
> forward it again to the PSS contact who's preparing the business case
> for
> fixing it. So keep posting, folks!
>
> --
> Jeff Vandervoort
> JRVsystems
> "DSipp" DSipp@discussions.microsoft.com wrote in message
> news:25CAB71F-2D03-404E-84A2-8FCB2DD9BBB0@microsoft.com...
> How do I move those files? The system says they are locked and in
> safe
> mode
> they are gone?
>
> "Jeff Vandervoort" wrote:
>
> We're seeing the same thing here; I can confirm the results. And
> since
> Tomas
> posted a reply here, I thought I should too!
>
> Tomas' workaround worked for me, too, but while it fixes the
> ESENT.DLL
> crash, it has side effects you need to be aware of. If there are
> other
> security policies in GPO, they will not be removed when the computer
> is
> removed from the domain. The SceCli and Userenv errors will continue
> (although the SceCli one will change a bit).
>
> The only complete solution I know of is not to use Restricted Groups
> that
> have domain accounts among their members in a GPO that is in scope
> for
> a
> computer that will be removed from a domain. Fortunately, that was
> an
> option
> for us in this case, with only modest hardship. I haven't done this,
> yet,
> but will likely substitute a startup script that adds the group for
> me
> and
> the hardship will disappear; I don't care if the group doesn't get
> removed
> when the machine is removed from the domain.
>
> On a related note, I opened a Microsoft PSS incident for this. They
> have
> reproduced the behavior in their lab. PSS carefully avoided giving
> me
> any
> information about whether they intended to develop a fix; hopefully
> they
> will. This strikes me as a significant bug.
>
> --
> Jeff Vandervoort
> JRVsystems
> "T0MAS" T0MAS.1q1k2c@ wrote in message
> news:fPKdndBzirQPjz3fRVn_vg@giganews.com...
>
> I have solved same problem with crashing services.exe.
>
> User on bussiness trip removed his notebook from domain.
> He reports problem with error message :
> Title of window : Services and Controller app
> in error message: Error signature szAppName: Services.exe .....
> in event log was event 1000 Faulting application services.exe,
> version
> 5.1.2600.2180, faulting module esent.dll, version 5.1.2600.2180,
> fault
> address 0x0002334c.
> After clicking on Close button apears automatic shutdown counter
> and
> in
> 30 seconds system was restarted.
> This same behaviour repeated several times.
> In evet log I found misc. events with probably related with this
> problem:
>
> The Group Policy client-side extension Security failed to execute
> (event 1085)
> Faulting application services.exe
> Security policies were propagated with warning. 0x428 (event 1202)
>
> in winlogon.log (I have enabled debug for that purpose) I found:
> ----Configure Group Membership...
> Configure Administrators.
> Error 1332: No mapping between account names and security IDs was
> done.
> Error occurred during lookup of all accounts.
>
> It was seems that some domain policy that contains Restricted group
> feature remains on notebook and periodically in moment when policy
> was
> refreshed caused error with services.exe. I knew that when notebook
> was
> removed from domain then domain policy cannot applied to non-member
> computer.
> I made several actions : I again joined notebook to domain(then
> restart) and again I removed it and problem occured again and
> again.
> I
> disabled background policy refresh, I set refresh interval to max
> value
> 45 days and nothing helps. When automatic shutdown apears I stoped
> it
> every time by command shutdown /a.
> Every time I found in winlogon.log that some policy tryed manage
> membership in groups and ends with error because probably did not
> have
> access to domain (notebook was removed from domain).
>
> I have tryed to check consistency od secedit.sdb by esentutl /g
> %windir%\Security\Database\Secedit.sdb and all was OK.
> Excuse my english.
> After that i crossed my mind that it may not caused by deffective
> remained domain policy but it may caused by local group policy
> which
> contain domain accounts (SIDs). Thats my deduction.
> After that I moved c:\WINDOWS\security\Database\secedit.sdb and
> c:\WINDOWS\security\*edb* and c:\WINDOWS\security\*.log to backup
> folder and after restart local group policy was reseted and after
> that
> user confirmed that error never apears and all works fine.
>
> In my case (case of one of my users) problem with crashing
> services.exe
> and periodical restarts was solved by reseting local group policy
> (by
> removing database and related files).
>
> When I begin solving of this problem I spent to much time with
> searching similar problem on Internet but I din't found equal. This
> page was not usefull exactly in my cause but everytime when I
> searching
> on Inet by using misc. search engines I everytime get this page
> therefore I decided to write my solution here.
> I have writed in this my article too much informations because each
> user searching this problem on Internet with miscelaneous with
> keywords
> and therefore I writed so much (for search engines too).
>
> I hope that same case may happen to someone and my story may helps
> him.
>
> Admin from Slovak Republic (Slovakia not Slovenia)
>
>
> --
> T0MASPosted from http://www.pcreview.co.uk/ newsgroup access
>
>
>
>
>
>
>



--
rfrendreiss

Posted by Thomas Wendell on December 6th, 2005


You could try NetSwitcher?
http://www.netswitcher.com/


--
************************************************** ****
Most learned on these newsgroups
Tumppi, Helsinki, FINLAND
(translations from/to FI not always accurate)
************************************************** ****




"rfrendreiss" <rfrendreiss.1zl0lz@pcbanter.net> kirjoitti
viestissä:rfrendreiss.1zl0lz@pcbanter.net...
>
> Thanks for all of your responses. I am getting this error too on a
> laptop that was removed from the domain. There is a need to be able to
> remove yourself from one domain and add to another, especially if you
> travel to different companies and do consulting work. I have to change
> my domain constantly. Perhaps Microsoft could change their app to allow
> multiple domain connection configuration.... Oh well. Anyway thanks
> for the fix ideas. I have tried them and am waiting to see if I still
> get this message. Hopefully Microsoft will decide to put a fix out
> there for this.
> Jeff Vandervoort Wrote:
>> And, at this writing at least, the bug still does not appear to be
>> documented on Microsoft's Knowledge Base. I've requested that it be
>> added...for whatever that's worth.
>>
>> --
>> Jeff Vandervoort
>> JRVsystems
>> "Bosmm" Bosmm@discussions.microsoft.com wrote in message
>> news:19D71B2A-80BA-4117-AD65-493841DB511F@microsoft.com...
>> I am soo glad I found this post!!!!
>>
>> I too am having the exact same problem. I had users that were
>> disjoined
>> from
>> the Domain when we opened up an outstation. After all my searching for
>> a
>> problem I was convinced it had to be something specific with the
>> "other"
>> network they are now on. I am going to start wading through your fixes
>> and
>> see where I get.
>>
>> There was definately a business reason for removing the computers from
>> the
>> Domain and I would DEFINATELY call this a BUG...
>>
>> Thanks again!
>>
>> "Jeff Vandervoort" wrote:
>>
>> That didn't happen on my test system, but I don't like that
>> workaround
>> anyway...too many side-effects. So I've only done it on one system,
>> just
>> to
>> confirm PSS's results.
>>
>> My suggestion is to create a Startup Script that adds the Restricted
>> Groups
>> to the local SAM instead of using the AD Restricted Groups feature.
>>
>> Also, an update for all lurkers...make sure to append your "me too"
>> message
>> to this thread and keep it alive. I just received a call from MS PSS
>> and
>> they are evaluating the cost-effectiveness of fixing this issue. The
>> guy
>> I
>> spoke to was skeptical that it affected many people...his reasoning
>> was,
>> "How many people disjoin a computer from a domain?". My client has a
>> good
>> reason to do so...how about you? I've given the Google Search URL for
>> this
>> thread to them and have reason to believe it's being monitored. I'm
>> going
>> to
>> forward it again to the PSS contact who's preparing the business case
>> for
>> fixing it. So keep posting, folks!
>>
>> --
>> Jeff Vandervoort
>> JRVsystems
>> "DSipp" DSipp@discussions.microsoft.com wrote in message
>> news:25CAB71F-2D03-404E-84A2-8FCB2DD9BBB0@microsoft.com...
>> How do I move those files? The system says they are locked and in
>> safe
>> mode
>> they are gone?
>>
>> "Jeff Vandervoort" wrote:
>>
>> We're seeing the same thing here; I can confirm the results. And
>> since
>> Tomas
>> posted a reply here, I thought I should too!
>>
>> Tomas' workaround worked for me, too, but while it fixes the
>> ESENT.DLL
>> crash, it has side effects you need to be aware of. If there are
>> other
>> security policies in GPO, they will not be removed when the computer
>> is
>> removed from the domain. The SceCli and Userenv errors will continue
>> (although the SceCli one will change a bit).
>>
>> The only complete solution I know of is not to use Restricted Groups
>> that
>> have domain accounts among their members in a GPO that is in scope
>> for
>> a
>> computer that will be removed from a domain. Fortunately, that was
>> an
>> option
>> for us in this case, with only modest hardship. I haven't done this,
>> yet,
>> but will likely substitute a startup script that adds the group for
>> me
>> and
>> the hardship will disappear; I don't care if the group doesn't get
>> removed
>> when the machine is removed from the domain.
>>
>> On a related note, I opened a Microsoft PSS incident for this. They
>> have
>> reproduced the behavior in their lab. PSS carefully avoided giving
>> me
>> any
>> information about whether they intended to develop a fix; hopefully
>> they
>> will. This strikes me as a significant bug.
>>
>> --
>> Jeff Vandervoort
>> JRVsystems
>> "T0MAS" T0MAS.1q1k2c@ wrote in message
>> news:fPKdndBzirQPjz3fRVn_vg@giganews.com...
>>
>> I have solved same problem with crashing services.exe.
>>
>> User on bussiness trip removed his notebook from domain.
>> He reports problem with error message :
>> Title of window : Services and Controller app
>> in error message: Error signature szAppName: Services.exe .....
>> in event log was event 1000 Faulting application services.exe,
>> version
>> 5.1.2600.2180, faulting module esent.dll, version 5.1.2600.2180,
>> fault
>> address 0x0002334c.
>> After clicking on Close button apears automatic shutdown counter
>> and
>> in
>> 30 seconds system was restarted.
>> This same behaviour repeated several times.
>> In evet log I found misc. events with probably related with this
>> problem:
>>
>> The Group Policy client-side extension Security failed to execute
>> (event 1085)
>> Faulting application services.exe
>> Security policies were propagated with warning. 0x428 (event 1202)
>>
>> in winlogon.log (I have enabled debug for that purpose) I found:
>> ----Configure Group Membership...
>> Configure Administrators.
>> Error 1332: No mapping between account names and security IDs was
>> done.
>> Error occurred during lookup of all accounts.
>>
>> It was seems that some domain policy that contains Restricted group
>> feature remains on notebook and periodically in moment when policy
>> was
>> refreshed caused error with services.exe. I knew that when notebook
>> was
>> removed from domain then domain policy cannot applied to non-member
>> computer.
>> I made several actions : I again joined notebook to domain(then
>> restart) and again I removed it and problem occured again and
>> again.
>> I
>> disabled background policy refresh, I set refresh interval to max
>> value
>> 45 days and nothing helps. When automatic shutdown apears I stoped
>> it
>> every time by command shutdown /a.
>> Every time I found in winlogon.log that some policy tryed manage
>> membership in groups and ends with error because probably did not
>> have
>> access to domain (notebook was removed from domain).
>>
>> I have tryed to check consistency od secedit.sdb by esentutl /g
>> %windir%\Security\Database\Secedit.sdb and all was OK.
>> Excuse my english.
>> After that i crossed my mind that it may not caused by deffective
>> remained domain policy but it may caused by local group policy
>> which
>> contain domain accounts (SIDs). Thats my deduction.
>> After that I moved c:\WINDOWS\security\Database\secedit.sdb and
>> c:\WINDOWS\security\*edb* and c:\WINDOWS\security\*.log to backup
>> folder and after restart local group policy was reseted and after
>> that
>> user confirmed that error never apears and all works fine.
>>
>> In my case (case of one of my users) problem with crashing
>> services.exe
>> and periodical restarts was solved by reseting local group policy
>> (by
>> removing database and related files).
>>
>> When I begin solving of this problem I spent to much time with
>> searching similar problem on Internet but I din't found equal. This
>> page was not usefull exactly in my cause but everytime when I
>> searching
>> on Inet by using misc. search engines I everytime get this page
>> therefore I decided to write my solution here.
>> I have writed in this my article too much informations because each
>> user searching this problem on Internet with miscelaneous with
>> keywords
>> and therefore I writed so much (for search engines too).
>>
>> I hope that same case may happen to someone and my story may helps
>> him.
>>
>> Admin from Slovak Republic (Slovakia not Slovenia)
>>
>>
>> --
>> T0MASPosted from http://www.pcreview.co.uk/ newsgroup access
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>

>
>
> --
> rfrendreiss



Posted by rfrendreiss on December 6th, 2005



Hmm, well that's just too simple. Thanks, I think I will try that!

Thomas Wendell Wrote:
> You could try NetSwitcher?
> http://www.netswitcher.com/
>
>
> --
> ************************************************** ****
> Most learned on these newsgroups
> Tumppi, Helsinki, FINLAND
> (translations from/to FI not always accurate)
> ************************************************** ****
>
>
>
>
> "rfrendreiss" rfrendreiss.1zl0lz@pcbanter.net kirjoitti
> viestissä:rfrendreiss.1zl0lz@pcbanter.net...
>
> Thanks for all of your responses. I am getting this error too on a
> laptop that was removed from the domain. There is a need to be able
> to
> remove yourself from one domain and add to another, especially if you
> travel to different companies and do consulting work. I have to
> change
> my domain constantly. Perhaps Microsoft could change their app to
> allow
> multiple domain connection configuration.... Oh well. Anyway thanks
> for the fix ideas. I have tried them and am waiting to see if I still
> get this message. Hopefully Microsoft will decide to put a fix out
> there for this.
> Jeff Vandervoort Wrote:
> And, at this writing at least, the bug still does not appear to be
> documented on Microsoft's Knowledge Base. I've requested that it be
> added...for whatever that's worth.
>
> --
> Jeff Vandervoort
> JRVsystems
> "Bosmm" Bosmm@discussions.microsoft.com wrote in message
> news:19D71B2A-80BA-4117-AD65-493841DB511F@microsoft.com...
> I am soo glad I found this post!!!!
>
> I too am having the exact same problem. I had users that were
> disjoined
> from
> the Domain when we opened up an outstation. After all my searching
> for
> a
> problem I was convinced it had to be something specific with the
> "other"
> network they are now on. I am going to start wading through your
> fixes
> and
> see where I get.
>
> There was definately a business reason for removing the computers
> from
> the
> Domain and I would DEFINATELY call this a BUG...
>
> Thanks again!
>
> "Jeff Vandervoort" wrote:
>
> That didn't happen on my test system, but I don't like that
> workaround
> anyway...too many side-effects. So I've only done it on one system,
> just
> to
> confirm PSS's results.
>
> My suggestion is to create a Startup Script that adds the Restricted
> Groups
> to the local SAM instead of using the AD Restricted Groups feature.
>
> Also, an update for all lurkers...make sure to append your "me too"
> message
> to this thread and keep it alive. I just received a call from MS PSS
> and
> they are evaluating the cost-effectiveness of fixing this issue. The
> guy
> I
> spoke to was skeptical that it affected many people...his reasoning
> was,
> "How many people disjoin a computer from a domain?". My client has a
> good
> reason to do so...how about you? I've given the Google Search URL for
> this
> thread to them and have reason to believe it's being monitored. I'm
> going
> to
> forward it again to the PSS contact who's preparing the business case
> for
> fixing it. So keep posting, folks!
>
> --
> Jeff Vandervoort
> JRVsystems
> "DSipp" DSipp@discussions.microsoft.com wrote in message
> news:25CAB71F-2D03-404E-84A2-8FCB2DD9BBB0@microsoft.com...
> How do I move those files? The system says they are locked and in
> safe
> mode
> they are gone?
>
> "Jeff Vandervoort" wrote:
>
> We're seeing the same thing here; I can confirm the results. And
> since
> Tomas
> posted a reply here, I thought I should too!
>
> Tomas' workaround worked for me, too, but while it fixes the
> ESENT.DLL
> crash, it has side effects you need to be aware of. If there are
> other
> security policies in GPO, they will not be removed when the computer
> is
> removed from the domain. The SceCli and Userenv errors will continue
> (although the SceCli one will change a bit).
>
> The only complete solution I know of is not to use Restricted Groups
> that
> have domain accounts among their members in a GPO that is in scope
> for
> a
> computer that will be removed from a domain. Fortunately, that was
> an
> option
> for us in this case, with only modest hardship. I haven't done this,
> yet,
> but will likely substitute a startup script that adds the group for
> me
> and
> the hardship will disappear; I don't care if the group doesn't get
> removed
> when the machine is removed from the domain.
>
> On a related note, I opened a Microsoft PSS incident for this. They
> have
> reproduced the behavior in their lab. PSS carefully avoided giving
> me
> any
> information about whether they intended to develop a fix; hopefully
> they
> will. This strikes me as a significant bug.
>
> --
> Jeff Vandervoort
> JRVsystems
> "T0MAS" T0MAS.1q1k2c@ wrote in message
> news:fPKdndBzirQPjz3fRVn_vg@giganews.com...
>
> I have solved same problem with crashing services.exe.
>
> User on bussiness trip removed his notebook from domain.
> He reports problem with error message :
> Title of window : Services and Controller app
> in error message: Error signature szAppName: Services.exe .....
> in event log was event 1000 Faulting application services.exe,
> version
> 5.1.2600.2180, faulting module esent.dll, version 5.1.2600.2180,
> fault
> address 0x0002334c.
> After clicking on Close button apears automatic shutdown counter
> and
> in
> 30 seconds system was restarted.
> This same behaviour repeated several times.
> In evet log I found misc. events with probably related with this
> problem:
>
> The Group Policy client-side extension Security failed to execute
> (event 1085)
> Faulting application services.exe
> Security policies were propagated with warning. 0x428 (event 1202)
>
> in winlogon.log (I have enabled debug for that purpose) I found:
> ----Configure Group Membership...
> Configure Administrators.
> Error 1332: No mapping between account names and security IDs was
> done.
> Error occurred during lookup of all accounts.
>
> It was seems that some domain policy that contains Restricted group
> feature remains on notebook and periodically in moment when policy
> was
> refreshed caused error with services.exe. I knew that when notebook
> was
> removed from domain then domain policy cannot applied to non-member
> computer.
> I made several actions : I again joined notebook to domain(then
> restart) and again I removed it and problem occured again and
> again.
> I
> disabled background policy refresh, I set refresh interval to max
> value
> 45 days and nothing helps. When automatic shutdown apears I stoped
> it
> every time by command shutdown /a.
> Every time I found in winlogon.log that some policy tryed manage
> membership in groups and ends with error because probably did not
> have
> access to domain (notebook was removed from domain).
>
> I have tryed to check consistency od secedit.sdb by esentutl /g
> %windir%\Security\Database\Secedit.sdb and all was OK.
> Excuse my english.
> After that i crossed my mind that it may not caused by deffective
> remained domain policy but it may caused by local group policy
> which
> contain domain accounts (SIDs). Thats my deduction.
> After that I moved c:\WINDOWS\security\Database\secedit.sdb and
> c:\WINDOWS\security\*edb* and c:\WINDOWS\security\*.log to backup
> folder and after restart local group policy was reseted and after
> that
> user confirmed that error never apears and all works fine.
>
> In my case (case of one of my users) problem with crashing
> services.exe
> and periodical restarts was solved by reseting local group policy
> (by
> removing database and related files).
>
> When I begin solving of this problem I spent to much time with
> searching similar problem on Internet but I din't found equal. This
> page was not usefull exactly in my cause but everytime when I
> searching
> on Inet by using misc. search engines I everytime get this page
> therefore I decided to write my solution here.
> I have writed in this my article too much informations because each
> user searching this problem on Internet with miscelaneous with
> keywords
> and therefore I writed so much (for search engines too).
>
> I hope that same case may happen to someone and my story may helps
> him.
>
> Admin from Slovak Republic (Slovakia not Slovenia)
>
>
> --
> T0MASPosted from http://www.pcreview.co.uk/ newsgroup access
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> rfrendreiss



--
rfrendreiss


Similar Posts