This is an incredible tweak that has improved the performance of my
system by leaps and bounds.
There have been lots of articles and tweaks concerning the Page File.
I have tried them all, however... http://online-windows-xp.blogspot.com/

In earlier NT systems it was usual to have such a file on each hard
drive partition, if there were more than one partition, with the idea of
having the file as near as possible to the 'action' on the disk. In XP
the optimisation implied by this has been found not to justify the
overhead, and normally there is only a single page file in the first
instance.

Source: http://aumha.org/win5/a/xpvm.htm


--



Hope this helps.

Gerry
~~~~
FCA
Stourport, England
Enquire, plan and execute
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


456 wrote:

"Gerry" <gerry@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:%23xgvC98VIHA.4972@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

If you have enough RAM...
then I doubt if the page file size or placement comes into play anyway

In article <y_KdnWqPn-0azRDanZ2dnUVZ_ualnZ2d@athenet.net>,
philo <philo@privacy.net> wrote:


Size and placement isn't the issue, it's reads and writes per second.

This is roughly related to "Page Faults" and "PF Delta" in
taskmanager, which can be selected in View/Select Columns

"philo" <philo@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:y_KdnWqPn-0azRDanZ2dnUVZ_ualnZ2d@athenet.net...
started running pretty slowly. The total memory usage almost never got over
0.5GB...so I just completely disabled the pagefile. After that the system
became much snappier.

Boris