Is there really some performance increase to be had by having the swap
file on a separate hard disc?

TBH, I did not notice much difference when I tried that configuration
in the past, but them again, I tend not to hammer my physical memory
to zilch.

--
Cheers,

DrT

"If you want to find out what is wrong
with democracy, spend five minutes with
the average voter." - Winston Churchill

With contemporary hard disk technology I do not believe you will notice
any difference at all in performance or reliability.

---
Leonard Grey
Errare humanum est

DrTeeth wrote:

On Wed, 02 Apr 2008 16:12:40 -0400, Leonard Grey
<Leonard@Grey.invalid> wrote:

TBH, that is my gut feeling. It seems to be one of those oft given
pieces of advice, which though plausible, don't amount to much (like
clearing out the prefetch folder <rolls eyes>).

Thanks.

--
Cheers,

DrT

** Stress - the condition brought about by having to
** resist the temptation to beat the living daylights
** out of someone who richly deserves it.

At one time, years ago, that was probably good advice (for the
technically inclined.) We have to keep up with the times. ;-)

---
Leonard Grey
Errare humanum est

DrTeeth wrote:

On Wed, 02 Apr 2008 20:45:04 +0100, DrTeeth <no-email@tardis.com>
wrote:


Possibly, if it's on a separate *physical* disk. No, if it's on a
second partition on your only physical disk.

But if you have enough RAM so that the swap file is hardly ever used,
it makes very little difference where you put it.



--
Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience
Please Reply to the Newsgroup

Thanks Ken.

--
Cheers,

DrT

** Stress - the condition brought about by having to
** resist the temptation to beat the living daylights
** out of someone who richly deserves it.

On Thu, 03 Apr 2008 12:07:07 +0100, DrTeeth <no-email@tardis.com>
wrote:


You're welcome. Glad to help.

--
Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience
Please Reply to the Newsgroup