Web-S-Sense Pty. Ltd.
PO Box 110
Surrey Downs, South Australia 5126
Australia
610408827991

cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker -
cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker -
cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker -
cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker -
cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker -
cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker -
cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker -
cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker -
cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker -
cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker -
cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker -
cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker -
cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker -
cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker -
cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker -
cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker -
cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker -
cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker -
cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker -
cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker -
cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker -
cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker -
cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker -
cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker -
cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker -
cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker -
cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker -
cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker -
cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker -
cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker -
cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker - cock sucker

Try owning your own fucking NNTP server you faggot. Stop fucking leaching

Anger problem?



Cunning Linguist <topchop@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<2un912-cmr.ln1@nymshifter.com>...

no_spam_here wrote:
Or just shear stupity?

Notan

"Notan" <notan@ddress.com> wrote in message
news:41431A7E.69031227@ddress.com...
"shear stupity"...hilarious!

nospam wrote:
A mear slip of the fingers. <g>

Notan

obviously an owner of an AMD system


"no_spam_here" <nospamhereno@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:86933b8e.0409110241.6abc297a@posting.google.c om...

Notan wrote:
<G>

I must admit to getting a bit annoyed myself at some of the posts showing up
through that portal though. The one good thing about usenet is that
*generally* most complete n00bs don't know about it. This makes the quality
of the advice given in a loy of the comp groups quite good. Since that
portal has been running I've seen some plainly stupid advice from obvious
know-nothing kiddies in some of my favourite NGs.

It's akin to spam IMO.
--
~misfit~

"~misfit~" <misfit61nz@hayoo.co.nz> wrote in
news:iwL0d.1419$JQ4.85869@news.xtra.co.nz:

....cut...

read this and see link

"The visitors of your website won't notice that your web-forum is in
fact a newsgroup."

From http://florian-amrhein.de/newsportal

sad sad sad lies lies lies

samuel wrote:
That sucks! This "Howtofixcomputers" seems to be getting quite popular, at
least I'm seeing quite a few posts from there. I haven't checked the site
but this guy could be getting advertising revenue from basically leeching
froman established resource. I mean, if it didn't impose on the quality of
my newsgroup experience I'd probably applaud the guy. As it is it is
adversely affecting *my* newsgroups.
--
~misfit~

~misfit~ wrote:
"Your" newsgroups? hehe

I think that I was the only person on the planet that still to not like AMD
systems.
I´m happy to not be the only one.

"JAD" <Kapasitor@coldmail.com> escreveu na mensagem
news:10k70mih8k84b21@corp.supernews.com...

David Maynard wrote:
<g>, Ok, *our* newsgroups. ;-)
--
~misfit~

~misfit~ wrote:

Btw, since everyone was talking about the site, but apparently didn't go
look at it, I went there.

It says right up front "Forum messages are synchronized with Usenet" and
each 'forum' lists which usenet newsgroup it's associated with. While I
can't say as I like the idea of web surfers posting into usenet, for the
reasons already stated, I also can't say they're being 'deceptive' about it.

Btw, you're listed as the last poster in their 'hardware' forum, that's
synced with alt.comp.hardware, and in 'webcams' (alt.comp.periphs.webcam) hehe

..

I cannot grasp this response, as google has had a web based newsgroups
access for quite a while, and I believe there are a few others. This is old
news, so why would it seem to be significant in recent developments? What am
i missing?
TIA.

dj

"~misfit~" <misfit61nz@hayoo.co.nz> wrote in message
news:iwL0d.1419$JQ4.85869@news.xtra.co.nz...

Dr. Cajones wrote:
Google's NG experience isn't as user-friendly as this one and isn't quite so
easy to find. Google groups tend to be used by people already familiar with
NGs whereas this set-up has more of a board/chat look to it, more appealing
for n00bs.
--
~misfit~

I had a barber once who just couldn't get my hair at all close to the way I
told him to cut it. I chalked that up to "shear stupidity".


--

Herb Kauhry wrote:
Very nice! <g>

Notan

"Charles Bronson" <charlesbronson@deathwish.zzn.com> wrote in message
news:2qhlh9Fvmiu2U1@uni-berlin.de...
Both you & JAD.
What's wrong with you AMD Hating people, did you know that AMD came out with
64 Bit tech before intel?
Did you know AMD chips have some features that Intel could only dream about?
Intel's 775 Pin LGA may have 64 Bit Tech, but your not going to find a copy
of WinXp that will use it.
By "X-Mas" I think Microsoft will release a copy of WinXp 64 for Intel.
This means that you can run an AMD 64 With WinXp 64 + Did you know that the
true (FSB)
To some of the 64 Bit chips is 400 MHz Hm? So, that's another 200 MHz
over Intel.
Should I keep explaining?

Also, I typed this on a P4, but I also have a 2200+
Both these two systems have things I'm finding can do better on the other
one.
Truth is I cant say anything bad about either system.
Denny. ;-) :-)

ahhhh another stock holder.............. down a 1/4 again?

"Dennis E Strausser Jr" <dstrausser33@comcast.net> wrote in message
newsp6dndsRB4YkPNXcRVn-gg@giganews.com...