My S530 is kaput and I'm looking at the 3000. I've had trouble finding
reviews, and the one I found on Cnet I belive, wasn't that great?
Does anyone have one and if so, how is it? I just do general light printing
and the occasional photo. 4 tanks is fine...I don't need more.

Thanks
Wilma

Wilma Flintstone wrote:

Any reviews on dpreview.com?

--
Ben Thomas
Opinions, conclusions, and other information in this message that do not
relate to the official business of my firm shall be understood as neither
given nor endorsed by it.

"BenOne©" <nosp@m.thanks.mate> wrote in message
news:kkvdnc.9o6.ln@192.168.11.2...
A search for Pixma came up empty!

Wilma Flintstone wrote:

I think you can browse the reviews alphabetically, and you should also try
searching by a model number such as ip3000. I can't try it because I've only got
UseNet access at the moment (no WWW).

--
Ben Thomas
Opinions, conclusions, and other information in this message that do not
relate to the official business of my firm shall be understood as neither
given nor endorsed by it.

On 2004-11-17, BenOne© <nosp@m.thanks.mate> wrote:
printer reviews for photo printing; might find the ip4000 instead of ip3000 tho;
north america version without the cd printing.

"Bill" <bill@c.a> wrote in message news:Tu2dncEUJ7MpuQbcRVn-2Q@golden.net...
Thanks Bill What a great idea!!
BTW have YOU tried that search? How many WORTHWHILE hits did you get ?
My request was for people with ownership experience, not re hashing the info
on Canon's site.
I'm going to pick one up today so if anyone else is interested....just ask!

On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 17:22:22 GMT, "Wilma Flintstone"
<nowhere@nothing.com> wrote:

If you post your comments in the newsgroup, everyone benefits.
Thanks,
Don
--

"Bill" <bill@c.a> wrote in message news:b42dnX0-DbHKIwbcRVn-oA@golden.net...
Googled Reviews aside for now , I would have to agree that the quality of
the
plastic used in the top and front covers is disappointing given they're the
parts that
would receive the most abuse. The thing that impressed me about my recently
departed
S530D was the quality of the case. It was built like a battleship! That
would be a concern
for me if I had a couple of teenagers in the house . Once everything is in
postion though,
it doesn't really matter. I wouldn't agree that the PRINTER is flimsy, in
fact it's quite heavy, but
those 2 panels are a disappointment.

I do like the option for using the top feed or bottom tray. My shelving is a
little tight on the top and
while it was fine for the 530, I had to bend the paper to load it into the
3000. Not to worry, I now use the
bottom tray and it isn't an issue .I will probably use the top for envelopes
and it will be a pleasant change not to have
to remove the paper to do it.

I haven't printed too much yet, but the print quality seems very good and
the printer is very quiet, even without
the Quiet Mode. I'm disappointed that they chose to include the PictBridge
connection rather than memory card
slots as other manufacturers have in this price range .

Basically I would say most Canon fans would like this printer and the
advanced paper handling capabilities
would appeal to heavy users who enjoy the cost savings associated with these
printers

"Bill" <bill@c.a> wrote in message news:b42dnX0-DbHKIwbcRVn-oA@golden.net...
I wonder if we are picking up the same Canon 'iP' Series printers.
My iP 4000 and the others I have seen are all built quite well and just as
solid as my BJC3000, S520 and i560. In fact I think it is a step up in that
it has less flimsy paper trays than in the past.

What a shame. Especially since you are using data from a newsgroup where 99%
of the posters are those having a difficulty with a product. Hardly a way
to guage the fact that against units sold printhead failures are actually
not an issue, but instead an unfortunate rarity.

So if a city of millions has a few citizens that rob banks, does that city
have a history of harboring bank robbers?


That also have been known to fail. And when it does, guess who pays for the
replacement? You do.
IF my Canon printheads fail (which I have not had a problem with), it is
covered by the warranty.

Oh what a novel idea that Canon has been using on several of there models
for almost 2 years.
Not knocking HP (they make some good stuff to), but Canon hardly has the
issues you believe just because they would not replace your 4 month out of
warranty printhead.

I have the iP4000 and did not find these that much of an issue due to the
change of case design.

Definitely like the dual paper paths myself. Plain paper below and photo on
top for me.
The duplexing unit is definitely a plus as I print many large documents and
it is nice to print front/back without having to manually turn them over
anymore.

I think this was the trade off to get the duplexer, dual paper paths and
still keep it at the current price point.

I do, and yes I am a Canon fan.