In article <3f19cd6b$1@shknews01>, Azure¢« <no@no.com> wrote:

First of all, wouldn't that .0 address be a network address and not a
host (or router) address?

Second, since you've just told the router that all 172.16.1.x traffic
uses ATM0.1, why would it allow you to give ATM0.2 an address that is
part of the ATM0.1 network?

--
Bubba Dave Pooser

A computer lets you make more mistakes faster than any invention in
human history with the possible exceptions of handguns and tequila.

Oh..... thx.
u woke me up....



"Dave Pooser" <bubbadv@NOcyberrampSPAMDOTnet.invalid> ¦b¶l¥ó
news:190720031917007709%bubbadv@NOcyberrampSPAMDOT net.invalid ¤¤¼¶¼g...